Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00966
Original file (BC-2011-00966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00966 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. He be entitled to the Air Force Longevity Service Award 
(AFLSA). (Administratively Corrected). 

 

2. He be entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry 
Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign 
Medal (RVCM). (Administratively Corrected). 

 

3. He be entitled to the award of the Presidential Unit 
Citation (PUC). 

 

4. He be credited with boots on the ground in the Republic of 
Vietnam. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was told that he should have been awarded the PUC for his 
service in Thailand from Dec 65 to Dec 66. 

 

His record should indicate that he had “boots on ground” in 
Vietnam because he was at Da Nang Air Base in Dec 65 and Dec 66. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement; copies of his DD-214, Report of Transfer or 
Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 7 Dec 66 separation, 
and other documentation associated with his service in the 
United States Navy. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

Based on the available record, the applicant was released from 
active duty, effective 7 Dec 66. He was credited with 5 years, 
4 months, and 4 days of active service, including 1 year and 
20 days of foreign service. 


 

The applicant’s record was administratively corrected to reflect 
his entitlement to the RVNGC w/P, the RVCM, the Vietnam Service 
Medal with three bronze service stars (VSM w/3BSS and the Air 
Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V). 

 

On 21 July 2011, DPSIDR advised the applicant that his unit (432 
Supply Squadron) was not awarded the PUC during his tour of duty 
therefore he is not eligible. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request for 
boots on ground in Vietnam. They note that based on the 
provided information and the master personnel record, they did 
not find any information that reflects the applicant served in 
Vietnam. 

 

They were able to verify boots on ground in Thailand based on 
the applicant’s service from 15 Nov 65 to 15 Nov 66. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 9 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting 
corrective action in regard to the applicant’s entitlement to 
the PUC and boots on the ground in Vietnam. We took notice of 


the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the 
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief beyond 
that already granted administratively is not warranted. In 
addition, we note that the applicant was advised by letter, 
dated 21 Jul 11, that his organization did not receive the PUC 
during the time he was assigned, therefore, we did not find any 
evidence that the applicant was entitled to the requested award. 
In view of the above, we find no basis to favorably consider 
this portion of his application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-00966 in Executive Session on 7 February 2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Mar 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 16 Jun 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Dec11. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04289

    Original file (BC-2011-04289.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VSM is awarded to service members of the Armed Forces who served at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, their contiguous waters, or the airspaces there over, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Although the applicant received the VSM and RVCM, the award of these decorations did not require his actual presence in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00951

    Original file (BC 2014 00951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00951 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect military service in Vietnam. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he had boots-on-the-ground in the Republic of Vietnam. The following documentary evidence was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00408

    Original file (BC 2014 00408.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He served for a little less than four years because of hazardous missions flown in SEA. While the applicant has not provided conclusive evidence that he completed a TDY to Vietnam, it is our opinion the APR for the period ending 27 Sep 68 coupled with AFPS’s database appear to weigh more in favor of amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01486

    Original file (BC-2011-01486.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded to AFPC/DPAPP’s request for additional information and provided a statement from a former member stating he performed duties in Vietnam with the applicant. Based on a statement from a former service member and Temporary Duty Orders produced by the applicant, we believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00589

    Original file (BC-2012-00589.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00589 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. f. Any unit awards for time served in Vietnam. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05724

    Original file (BC 2013 05724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05724 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for his foreign service in Thailand and Guam (Administratively corrected), and Okinawa. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03452

    Original file (BC-2012-03452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03452 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we do not find the evidence presented by the applicant is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01435

    Original file (BC-2011-01435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01435 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Oct 11 for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03747

    Original file (BC-2011-03747.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03747 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: a. Award of the Bronze Star Medal with Valor (BSM w/V), the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), and the Philippine Defense Medal...