Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00905
Original file (BC-2011-00905.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00905 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His 11 Oct 2011 “Unsatisfactory” Fitness Assessment (FA) score 
be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

On 11 Oct 2011, he received an unsatisfactory FA score for 
failing the cardio component due to the winds. AFI 36-2905, Air 
Force Fitness Program, para 16a states the wind must be at or 
below 15 miles per hour (mph) with less than 20 mph gusts. On 
the morning of his test the wind was well above standards as 
noted by base weather. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of a 
memorandum and email communiqué from base weather verifying the 
wind speed on the date in question, and an extract from AFI 36-
2905. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of senior airman (SrA, E-4). 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records are contained in 
the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force 
at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states that on 23 Apr 
2012, a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting 
additional documentation, specifically, a signed memorandum from 
the local base weather office stating that the temperature that 


day was less than 20 degrees Fahrenheit. The applicant did not 
provide the requested documentation. 

 

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 16 Jul 2012 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit C). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. DPSIM invited the 
applicant to provide additional documentation; specifically a 
signed memorandum from the local base weather office stating the 
temperature on the day in question was less than 20 degrees 
Fahrenheit. However, the applicant did not respond. Per AFI 
36-2905, paragraph 16a, Cold Stress: air temperature must be 
less than 20 degrees Fahrenheit with winds more than 15 mph 
sustained or 20 mph gusting. Although the applicant provided 
documentation reflecting the average winds on the day in 
question were between 19 mph and gusting to 28 mph, it did not 
include the temperature. Consequently, the conditions for cold 
stress as indicated above were not met. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 13 Sep 2012, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-00905: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jan 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIM, 27 Jun 2012, w/atch. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Jul 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 of Military Records 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05001

    Original file (BC-2012-05001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This guidance supersedes guidelines established in AFI 36-2905 (dated 1 Jul 10), paragraph A8.2.14.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the FA was conducted IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 2.1, which was applicable at the time of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02394

    Original file (BC-2012-02394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    They recommend denial of the request to have the fitness assessment dated 29 December 2011, removed from AFFMS. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 August 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03234

    Original file (BC-2011-03234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The temperature at the time of the test was below 20 degrees Fahrenheit and as required by AFI 36-2905, Air Force Fitness Program, the test should not have been administered. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 12.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02873

    Original file (BC-2012-02873.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated 12 July 2012, AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant provide additional supporting documentation to substantiate his claim; specifically, copies of his signed fitness questionnaire and a signed memorandum from the NCOIC or OIC of the bioenvironmental engineering office stating the weather conditions for the day in question (Exhibit B). The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 04354

    Original file (BC 2012 04354.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04354 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 2 April 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 April 2013.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01407

    Original file (BC 2013 01407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Standard FM 600, Record of Medical Care, dated 1 Nov 2012, indicates the applicant visited the Medical Treatment Facility, “for chest pain and shortness of breath.” His medical provider diagnosed him with “Acute Bronchospasm, secondary to overexertion in a cold environment with a documented sinus infection.” In accordance with AFI 36-2905, dated 26 June 12, paragraph 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00021

    Original file (BC-2012-00021.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D, E, and G. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove his 19 Feb 2010 FA from the AFFMS. DPSIM states the applicant is requesting his FA dated 19 Feb 2010 be removed from the AFFMS. The complete DPSID evaluation, with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01536

    Original file (BC-2012-01536.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01536 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness assessment (FA) failure dated 10 Aug 11 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The following is a summary of the applicant’s sit-up...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05600

    Original file (BC 2012 05600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 14 October 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 16 October 2012, the applicant’s commander indicated he was aware that the applicant did not complete the FA and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04864

    Original file (BC-2012-04864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was unjustly given an unsatisfactory FA score for being a “No Show” at the 15 Apr 12 testing, even though she had a medical condition which should have prevented her from taking the abdominal circumference (AC) portion. On 19 Jun 12, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling from her Deputy Group Commander for receiving an unsatisfactory FA score on 15 Apr 12 and for “fitness testing integrity...