Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00904
Original file (BC-2011-00904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00904 


 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to show he is entitled to the Vietnam 
Service Medal (VSM). ADMINISTRATIVELY CORRECTED 

 

He be awarded the Air Medal (AM). ADMINISTRATIVELY CORRECTED 

 

He be awarded any additional Air Medals. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He is entitled to wear the above listed awards because he served 
in the Air Force and flew on missions to Vietnam. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his 
DD Form 214 Report of Separation from Active Duty, his AF Form 7 Airman Military Record, an Air Medal citation dated 29 May 1974, 
copies of air performance reports and an undated historical 
excerpt on the C-133 exercises/mission. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
exhibit A. 

 

_________________ ______________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 6 January 
1949. He was progressively promoted to the grade of Master 
sergeant, E-7. He retired on 31 January 1975 and was credited 
with serving 26 years, and 25 days of active duty service. 

 

The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not reflect award of either a 
VSM or AM. 

 

By letter, dated 31 October 2011, AFPC/DPAPP, advised the 
applicant they had verified and confirmed his foreign service at 
Pleiku, Republic of Vietnam, but were unable to determine the 


exact amount of time served at this location. DPAPP requested 
that the applicant provide, within 30 days, any documentation 
available that gives proof of the amount of time he spent at the 
location. 

 

By letter, dated 2 December 2011, AFPC/DPSIDR, advised the 
applicant they had verified his entitlement to the VSM with 
1 Bronze Service Star (BSS) and the AM. The applicant’s record 
will be updated to reflect these awards and decorations. 
Unfortunately, they are unable to verify his entitlement to an 
additional AM. 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR states after a complete 
review of the applicant’s military personnel record (MPR) they 
must recommend denial of the applicant’s claim for award of any 
additional AMs. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 16 December 2011 for review and comment within 30 
days. As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief beyond 
that already granted administratively is not warranted. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
BC-2011-00904 in Executive Session on 24 January 2012, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 February 2011, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 2 December 2011. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 December 2011. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00021

    Original file (BC 2009 00021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s available military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibit C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the AM, CRM, and VSM. The CRM is awarded to U.S. Air Force, U.S. Air Force Reserve service members, and service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01861

    Original file (BC-2011-01861.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01861 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of flight records, personal flight log records and documents extracted from his military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03224

    Original file (BC-2011-03224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03224 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: 1. His service in Vietnam. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04125

    Original file (BC-2011-04125.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VSM is awarded to all members of the U.S. Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in Vietnam, its contiguous waters, or the airspace there-over, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam. While the applicant’s record indicates that he provided in-flight services to passengers/troops and he was credited foreign service for at least two extensive TDYs, and noting that he has provided two witnesses statements attesting to his service, after considering the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03271

    Original file (BC-2010-03271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03271 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, stating, in part, after a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03807

    Original file (BC-2010-03807.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03807 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His records be corrected to reflect the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), with one Bronze Service Star (1BSS). However, with regard to his request to reflect his service in Vietnam, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01548

    Original file (BC-2010-01548.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The DPSIDR complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 29 Oct 10 for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00071

    Original file (BC-2011-00071.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant was sent a letter requesting additional documentation to confirm his Vietnam Service; however, the documentation he provided did not verify that he served on a TDY assignment for more than 30 days. After reviewing the documentation submitted, we believe, the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to support award of the VSM.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01582

    Original file (BC-2010-01582.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states that neither the evidence of record nor the applicant’s military personnel record (MPR) substantiates that he served in Vietnam. Should the applicant provide sufficient evidence in the form of eyewitness statements, travel vouchers, or letters of evaluation to substantiate his eligibility for award of the VSM, we would be willing to reconsider his request. Exhibit B.