AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 04124
On 27 March 2002, the applicant was discharged with a BCD. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 04124 2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit H. In a letter to the Board dated 15 June 2012, the applicant, via his representative, requests reconsideration and provides additional evidence. The bad conduct discharge is too severe a punishment because at that time he did not have the medical evidence showing he has Attention Deficit...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 04126
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-04126 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. On 16 March 2010, the Board staff requested the applicant provide documentation pertaining to his post-service activities, within 30 days (Exhibit E). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 04130
A review of the applicants military record indicates he completed 19 years, 3 months, and 24 days of honorable federal service as of his discharge from the Air Force Reserve; however, only 11 years, 1 month, and 24 days of this time was satisfactory service creditable toward Reserve retired pay eligibility. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 04132
Records indicate he appeared, with counsel, before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 25 Feb 97. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and the BCMR Medical Consultant and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
The Board determined that the military records should be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff United States Air Force. Copy of Directive cc: DFAS-DE AFBCMR BC-2006-03564 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
The Board determined that the military records should be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff United States Air Force. Copy of Directive cc: DFAS-DE AFBCMR BC-2006-03970 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-06-03239
The discharge case was reviewed by the base legal office and found to be legally sufficient to support discharge and recommended his request for discharge in lieu of trial by court- martial be approved and he be discharged with an UOTHC discharge without probation and rehabilitation (P&R). The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, nor did he provide any facts warranting a change to his UOTHC discharge. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-06-03438
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFC recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Dec 06, for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1985-00820
He received the Air Force Commendation Medal and he was selected for junior officer of the month three times while stationed at the Air University. DPPRS further states that the applicant has not provided any new evidence or identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. The DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1987-02223-2
________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: The applicant submitted a similar request dated 14 May 87. b) He admitted to smoking marijuana on at least 12 occasions during 1966 and 1967. c) In Nov 66, he sold marijuana to another airman on different occasions receiving $12 from the other airman for each sale. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1987-03586
On 24 August 1984, applicant was discharged. In June 1987, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his bad conduct discharge (Exhibit B). According to the record, the discharge board’s recommendation for discharge was made following a proceeding during which applicant was represented by counsel and his substantive and procedural rights were satisfied.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1988-01116A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 1988-01116 COUNSEL: NONE xxxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 DECEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that his dishonorable discharge be remitted to allow for his retirement. The applicant’s complete submission, with...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1988-01539-2
By letter dated, 9 Dec 76, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) notified the applicant that his discharge was upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). However, in view of the AFDRB’s earlier decision, and the contents of the FBI Report, we are unpersuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge to fully honorable, his RE code of 2, or his reason for separation is warranted. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 5 Dec 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1990-00461-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1990-00461 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1992-00641-2
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings (ROP), with attachments, is at Exhibit E. In an application to the Board dated 13 September 2006, the applicant requests reconsideration. He states he was honorably discharged under medical conditions diagnosed with a personality disorder with over 16 years of service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1992-02612-4
If the Board is concerned with the number of days of supervision, then he requests it be changed to 30 days.” In addition, any information documented on the OPR can be included on the Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), since the PRF can include the member’s performance for his last 30 days. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting his consideration for promotion by a Special Selection Board (SSB) beginning with the CY87...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1993-00932-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1993-00932 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 June 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Validation of promotion and federal recognition to the rank of colonel and such other relief that may be just and proper. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1994-03030
He be promoted to the grade of major as of the date he was restored to active duty in 1994; and, that he be promoted to the grade lieutenant colonel with the date of rank and effective date of promotion he would have had had he been selected with his contemporaries. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JA recommended that the Board determine that the failure of the applicant to be given an opportunity to be promoted to major with...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1995-03805-3
It was the decision of the USAFE MLEB that his records go to the aggregate board to compete for a “DP” recommendation. In letters of 13 January and 2 December 2005, the applicant and his counsel request direct promotion to the grade of colonel, or in the alternative, SSB consideration for the CY 94 Col Board with a “DP” PRF, contending that applicant never received a “P” recommendation from the aggregate board and that based on his record of performance, would have received a...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1996-02696-2
We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of his appeal, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1998-03113-2
AFBCMR BC-1998-03113 INDEX CODE: 137.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: xxxxxxxxx Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1999-01621
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1999-01621 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Dec 12, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2000-00012-3
The Second Addendum to the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit W. In his most recent request for reconsideration, applicant contends he should not have been assigned to the Non-participating Ready Reserve Section (NNRPS) in January 1998. At the time he was assigned to NNRPS, he was and still is not qualified for worldwide duty in accordance with ARPC/SGPA memorandum dated 21 May 97. After careful consideration of the applicant's submission it is our opinion that the Air Force Reserve...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2000-00132-3
The Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is at Exhibit P. _________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel requests the AFBCMR recognize the errors by the Air Force, decline to render a further finding due to lack of jurisdiction, return the military record file for proper correction and a complete physical examination by the Air Force, and report its actions to the USCFC. Counsel states the Air Force has conceded that...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2000-03359-4
FOURTH ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2000-03359 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the grade of captain effective 1 February 1945, rather than 1 July 1945. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2001-01712-2
A summary of the evidence considered by the Board and the rationale for its decision is set forth in the Record of Proceedings, including exhibits, is attached at Exhibit H. In his request for reconsideration, applicant now requests his UOTHC discharge be changed to a disability separation. No treatment was given for MS while he was on active duty. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2001-01784-3
His complete submission, with attachments is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing the evidence of record, the applicant’s prior submissions, and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, we are not persuaded the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart medal. _________________________________________________________________ The following members...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2002-00480A
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s requests and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with Exhibits, at Exhibit G. On 2 Mar 02, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting her general discharge be upgraded. AFPC/JA states the applicant is requesting the Board review the proceedings of the AFDRB. Even if the focus was on the incident that resulted in...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2002-01823-3
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01823-3 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Form 126A, Record of Commanders Review Action, dated 16 April 2001, be changed to reflect “BE CONSIDERED FOR REINSTATEMENT IN THIS COURSE AT A LATER...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2002-02718
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02718 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 111.05, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he again requests the Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 25 April 1996 through 24 April 1997, be declared void and replaced with a...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2003-01216-2
On 1 November 2005, the Court remanded the case to the Board for reconsideration with instructions to review the Air Force records of investigation of applicant’s claim of ineffective counsel (Exhibit K) and the Discharge Review Board’s alleged findings that “an error and injustice” had occurred with regard to the applicant (Exhibit L). On 10 April 2001, an Investigating Officer (IO) was appointed by the Air Force Legal Services Agency (AFLSA) commander to examine the allegation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2003-01247
Members of the Board, Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Mr. Gregory A. Parker, and Mr. James L. Sommer, considered this application on 26 April 2007. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Ltr, AFPC/DPPPWB, dtd 21 Mar 07, w/atch BC-2003-01247 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2003-03851
INDEX CODE: 137.04 AFBCMR BC-2003-03851 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-00229
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit E. On 11 October 2005, the applicant submitted a letter appealing the Board’s decision with additional documentation. After thoroughly reviewing the available evidence of record and the additional documentation provided by applicant, we remain unpersuaded that his service-connected medical conditions, i.e., Spinal Disc Condition and Back Strain, are combat- related. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-00666A
In his rebuttal to the Air Force evaluation at Exhibit I, the applicant requests that if his debt is not cancelled, it be placed on hold until he has the opportunity to send his DD Form 214 in to show that he has completed two full years of active duty service. He states that HQ AFROTC denied his request for debt cancellation although he has served three years in the Army National Guard (ANG). In that regard, we agree with the determination of the Air Force office of primary responsibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-00761-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00761 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, traumatic arthritis, be assessed as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-00944-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H. On 8 September 2006, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration (Exhibit I), as the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit had provided a decision in the aforementioned case (Exhibit J). JAA provided an advisory on 19 September 2006 that recommended denial of the applicant’s reconsideration...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-00986
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G. In this most recent submission, applicant contends that due to combat fatigue his back was injured after falling while exiting a combat aircraft. The complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing the evidence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-01009A
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 17 Nov 04, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request as stated above (Exhibit E). In a DD Form 149, dated 5 Aug 06, the applicant again requests his RE code be changed to one that will allow him to reenlist in the Navy (Exhibit F). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the BCMR Medical Consultant evaluated the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-01183-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01183-2 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her now deceased husband’s record be changed to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Program (RCSBP). For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-01344
INDEX CODE: 137.04 AFBCMR BC-2004-01344-3 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-01344A
Ms. Looney voted to grant the applicant’s requests and submitted a minority report at Exhibit P. The following additional documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit G. Record of Proceeding, w/atchs, dated 17 Aug 04. Exhibit P. Minority Report RITA S. LOONEY Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of XXXXXXX, BC-2004-01344 The Board majority has accepted the recommendation of AFLSA/JAJM to...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-02068
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02068 (Case 3) INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His decoration citations and a copy of his American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) diploma be placed in his Officer Selection Record (OSR). During the board, his OSR was reviewed by five board members. As...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-02705
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02705 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 FEBRUARY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, Intervertebral Disc Syndrome, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-03117-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03117 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 April 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for the P0601A Colonel Board be removed from his records and replaced with the reaccomplished PRF reflecting an overall “Definitely...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-03796-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01679 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: EUGENE FIDELL HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation be declared void, he be retroactively reinstated to active duty, he be promoted to the grade of lieutenant colonel, and allowed to remain on active duty until he became eligible for...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-03796-6
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 2 March 2005, the Board considered applicant’s request for the SS and found no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief requested. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Addendum to Record of Proceedings at Exhibit I. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member Mr. Patrick C....
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-00650-3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the earlier decision, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit D. In a letter, dated 15 August 2007, the applicant requested reconsideration of his application and provided a statement from his former Bataan First Sergeant in support of his request. To the contrary, the former First Sergeant indicates that he was aware the commander was going to recommend the applicant for the SS and that it is his firm belief that had the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-01103-2
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS On 21 February 2006, the Board considered and denied his request but because of ongoing litigation (Doe v. Rumsfeld) surrounding the Anthrax Vaccination Program (AVIP) the Board provided a caveat that should the plaintiffs in the aforementioned case prevail against the Secretary of Defense, the Board would reconsider the applicant’s request. After careful and deliberate review of the HQ USAF/JAA advisory...