ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02718
INDEX CODE: 111.01, 111.05,
131.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he again requests the
Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 25 April 1996
through 24 April 1997, be declared void and replaced with a reaccomplished
report; his Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) for the CY98B Central
Colonel Selection Board be replaced with a substitute PRF; his Officer
Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected to reflect HAF instead of HAFF; and he
be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special
Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 1998B Central Lieutenant
Colonel Selection Board and all subsequent boards.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
At the time the applicant submitted his application he was serving on
extended active duty in the grade of major.
Applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to the grade of
lieutenant colonel by the CY98B, CY99A, CY99B, CY00A, and CY01B central
lieutenant colonel selection boards.
Applicant’s Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) from 1991 through 2001
reflect meets standards on all performance factors.
On 31 December 2002, the applicant was relieved from active duty and
retired in the grade of major, effective 1 January 2003. He had served 20
years, 6 months and 17 days of active duty.
On 20 August 2002, the applicant submitted an application with same request
as stated above. On 19 March 2003, the Board considered and denied the
applicant’s request. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is at
Exhibit H.
On 15 July 2006, the applicant submitted a memorandum again with the same
requests. In support of his request, he provided eight character
references and a copy of his January 1999 Officer Preselect Brief (Exhibit
I).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing the previous
documentation and noting the additional documentation submitted, we again
are not persuaded that approval of the corrections to the selection record
the applicant seeks is warranted. As previously stated, we are not
convinced by any of the statements provided that the information contained
in the reports were inaccurate assessments of the applicant’s performance
and promotion potential at the time they were prepared. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we again find no basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 30 April 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit H. Record of Proceedings, dated 21 July 2003,
with Exhibits.
Exhibit I. Applicant’s Memorandum, dated 15 July 2006,
with attachments.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02718
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPEB states that in reference to the applicant’s assertion that the senior rater signed the PRF based on an incorrect officer performance report and without knowledge of several major career achievements, the senior rater could have included the accomplishments in the applicant’s original PRF without it being documented in the record of performance. The most significant documents provided for our review...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02883
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02883 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Professional Military Education (PME) recommendations on his Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), closing 19 Mar 94 and 25 Nov 94, be changed from Intermediate Service School (ISS) to Senior Service School (SSS). The...
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement, a letter from his commander, dated 21 August 2001, Promotion Recommendation Forms (PRFs), for the CY99A and CY99B Board, Officer Selection Brief, prepared 16 November 1999, Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), closing 4 March 1998 and 4 March 1999, the citation to accompany the award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), and other documentation. The Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPB indicates that the...
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. 2 AFBCMR 98-00545 APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 March 1998 for review and comment within 30 days. Essentially, applicant contends that as a result of errors in his records, the Calendar Year 1997 (CY97) Central Lieutenant Colonel Board was given an inaccurate impression of his record; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we are...
In 1996 and 1997, she was awarded a Definitely Promote (DP) recommendation in both of her below-the-zone (BPZ) considerations for promotion to lieutenant colonel. In support of her appeal, her senior rater states that "her PRF omitted selection for Senior Service School and command. It only reflects job performance for the final 5 months of consolidation and deactivation from August 1997 to February 98.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02673
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02673 INDEX CODES: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 2006C (CY06C) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) be declared void and removed from her records, and the attached PRF be...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00189
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00189 (CASE 2) INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1994A (CY94A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. On 1 Nov 01, the Board...
In this respect, the Board majority notes that the Evaluation Report Appeal Board ( E M ) corrected the contested OPR by changing the additional rater's PME recommendation from ISS to SSS. Therefore, a majority of the Board recommends his corrected record be considered by Special Selection Board for the CY97C board. In the applicant’s case, the information regarding the award was available based upon the announcement date of 24 Feb 97; however, there is no requirement in AFI 36-2402 that...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-03546
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03546 INDEX CODE: 112.00, 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Management Level Evaluation Board (MLEB) president has provided a letter requesting the contested Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be declared void and removed from the applicant’s records and...
In support of his request, applicant submits a personal statement, a copy of the contested OPR and reaccomplished OPR, a copy of the contested PRF and revised PRF, statements of support from his rating chain and Management Level Review (MLR) President, the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) decision and additional documents associated with the issues cited in his contentions (Exhibit A). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...