Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-00229
Original file (BC-2004-00229.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-00229
            INDEX CODE:  108.07

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests  reconsideration
of his application for combat related compensation under the Combat  Related
Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant was released  from  active  duty  on  30  November  1992,  and
retired for satisfactory years of service  on  1  December  1992  under  the
provision of  AFM  35-7,  Title  10  United  States  Code  (USC).   Military
personnel records reflect he completed 20  years  and  3  months  on  active
duty.

On 7 January 2004, the applicant submitted  an  application  requesting  his
service-connected  medical  conditions,  spinal  disc  condition  and   back
strain, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify  for  compensation
under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.  On 6 April  2005,
the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request.   A  complete  copy
of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit E.

On 11 October 2005, the applicant submitted a letter appealing  the  Board’s
decision with additional  documentation.   On  21 October  2005,  the  Board
reconsidered the application and found that it did  not  meet  the  criteria
for reconsideration (Exhibit F).

The applicant submitted a letter dated 13 September 2006,  again  requesting
combat related compensation under the Combat  Related  Special  Compensation
(CRSC) Act.  In support  of  his  request,  he  provided  a  letter  from  a
physician stating that he (the physician) believes that  his  back  problems
certainly may have originated from the work he did while  in  the  military.
His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit G.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence  of  an  error  or  injustice.   After  thoroughly  reviewing  the
available evidence of record and the additional  documentation  provided  by
applicant,  we  remain  unpersuaded  that  his   service-connected   medical
conditions, i.e.,  Spinal  Disc  Condition  and  Back  Strain,  are  combat-
related.  The statement from the applicant’s civilian  physician  is  noted;
however, it does not substantiate that these  conditions  were  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war.  In the absence of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the  application
was denied without a personal appearance;  and  that  the  application  will
only be reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant
evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 9 February 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                       Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
                       Mr. James W. Russell III, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit E.  Record of Proceedings, dated 13 May 05,
                w/exhibits.
      Exhibit F.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 21 Oct 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit G.  Applicant’s Letter, dated 13 Sep 06, w/atch.


                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02998

    Original file (BC-2004-02998.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    As noted in the medical opinions provided by the high qualified medical experts, it is not probable that his back injury was not caused by changing a tire, but it is highly probable his back injury was a direct result of flying duties. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states three very qualified doctors have offered their opinion that the back...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01017

    Original file (BC-2005-01017.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Jul 05 for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01153

    Original file (BC-2005-01153.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01153 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 DEC 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, spinal disc condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00302

    Original file (BC-2005-00302.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 23 Feb 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his spinal disc condition is not combat related. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03824

    Original file (BC-2003-03824.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states his injuries occurred during training operations and according to CRSC criteria he is eligible for compensation since the injuries were incurred during an ORI and while deployed to Egypt to participate in Operation Accurate Test. The Medical Consultant states the fact that a member incurred a disability during a period of war or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03611

    Original file (BC-2005-03611.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03611 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 May 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Regarding his request for CRSC compensation, after a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00663

    Original file (BC-2004-00663.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 Dec 66, he underwent a laminectomy to repair a herniated disc, which he suffered while engaged in hazardous duty as a KC-135 Navigator on a mission from Andrews AFB to Seattle WA. He served 21 years, 6 months, and 27 days on active duty Available documentation reflects a DVA combined compensable rating of 70% for his unfitting conditions. His records reveal no record of any particular injury that could account for the onset of his back pain.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00229

    Original file (BC-2004-00229.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00229 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO XXXXXXX MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, spinal disc condition and back strain, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00763

    Original file (BC-2004-00763.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and documents extracted from his medical records. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant was appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force on 14 Jun 54. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00025

    Original file (BC-2005-00025.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00025 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, spinal disc condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...