SECOND ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01823-3
INDEX CODE: 135.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Form 126A, Record of
Commanders Review Action, dated 16 April 2001, be changed to reflect “BE
CONSIDERED FOR REINSTATEMENT IN THIS COURSE AT A LATER DATE.”
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 20 May 2003, the applicant's original request was considered and denied
by the Board. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding
the applicant’s request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the
Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F.
On 4 September 2004, he requested reconsideration based on new evidence.
On 22 April 2005, the Board considered and again denied his request. For
an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s
request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the
Record of Proceedings at Exhibit J.
On 7 May 2006, the applicant again requested reconsideration of his appeal
and provided a copy of a similar case considered by the AFBCMR wherein the
applicant had been granted similar relief to what he was asking for and
several letters of support.
Applicant’s submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit K.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing the evidence of record to include a letter from his
SUPT deputy commander recommending he have the opportunity to be reinstated
to SUPT, a majority of the Board is of the opinion sufficient relevant
evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an
injustice warranting a change to the applicant’s AETC 126A. While we
considered his request to be reinstated directly into SUPT training; we
believe that because of the period of time since his elimination from
training and the rigorous nature of military flight training programs, it
would be in the best interest of the Air Force and the applicant that he
should be provided another opportunity to compete, and if accepted, be
granted an age and total active service federal commissioned service
waiver. Therefore, a majority of the Board recommends his record be
corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to applicant be corrected to show that:
a. AETC Form 126A, Record of Commanders Review Action, Section III,
reflects “BE CONSIDERED FOR REINSTATEMENT IN THIS COURSE AT A LATER DATE.”
b. If accepted by a sponsoring flying unit and selected for JSUPT, he
be granted age and total active federal commissioned service waiver.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 11 December 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair
Mr. Kenneth Dumm, Member
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
By a majority vote, the Board voted to partially grant the request. Ms.
Boockholdt voted to deny the request but does not wish to submit a minority
report. The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 25 June 03,
w/atchs.
Exhibit J. Addendum Record of Proceedings, dated 15 May 05,
w/atchs.
Exhibit K. Letter, Applicant, dated 7 May 06, w/atchs.
KATHY L. BOOCKHOLDT
Panel Chair
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
[pic]
Office Of The Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2002-01823-3
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. AETC Form 126A, Record of Commanders Review Action,
Section III, reflects “BE CONSIDERED FOR REINSTATEMENT IN THIS COURSE AT A
LATER DATE.”
b. If accepted by a sponsoring flying unit and selected for
JSUPT, he be granted an age and a total active federal commissioned service
waiver.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2002-01823-3
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01823-3 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Form 126A, Record of Commanders Review Action, dated 16 April 2001, be changed to reflect “BE CONSIDERED FOR REINSTATEMENT IN THIS COURSE AT A LATER...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02568A
On 4 April, AETC/DOF approved an additional 3.0 hours flying time. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of the appeal, the majority of the Board remains unpersuaded that the applicant’s recommendation on the AETC Form 126A, dated 3 May 2002, Section III, Block 3, be changed from “should not be considered for reinstatement in this course at a later date” to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03830
After reviewing his training records, as required by AETCI 36-2205, the 47 Operations Group Commander recommended to the 47 TFW/CC that the applicant be eliminated from SUPT due to Manifestations of Apprehension (MOA) on 2 November 2000. AETC/SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AETC/DOF recommends the applicant not be reinstated into any flying training course. AETC/DOF complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. A complete copy of the HQ AETC/DOF evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response, the applicant indicated that he would agree that JSUNT and JSUPT have significant differences.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01979
On 7 May 2006, he applied for reconsideration a second time and provided a letter from his former Deputy Commander at JSUPT recommending the applicant be given a chance to compete for JSUPT. On 10 January 2007, the Board considered the new evidence presented by the applicant and a Board majority granted his request to change his AETC Form 126A to reflect “BE CONSIDERED FOR REINSTATEMENT IN THIS COURSE AT A LATER DATE.” The Board majority did not reinstate him to JSUPT but made it possible...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01823
DPFP’s evaluation, along with attached correspondence from the -- ANG Chief of Staff and an e-mail trail between DPFP and the ANG Advisor to the Commander for 19th Air Force, is at Exhibit B. HQ AETC/DOF recommends the applicant not be reinstated into SUPT. DOF’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant notes that the National Guard Bureau (NGB) has...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02211
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02211 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Form 126A, Record of Commanders Review Action, be amended to include the remarks of the Eliminating Authority recommending him for consideration for reinstatement into Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) at...
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Several errors occurred in his training and elimination from the Joint Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (JSUPT), T-44 program, with the Navy, which resulted in unfair treatment. Unlike the Air Force flying training elimination processes, the Navy’s elimination process considers a student’s performance from previous phases of training. Therefore, the applicant’s T-37 training records were...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01805
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/XOOT recommends the applicant, provided he now meets the minimum flying hour requirements for award of the pilot rating, first secure a helicopter pilot operational flying position and then submit an application to appear before an Aeronautical Review Board in accordance with AFI 11-402, paragraph 2.11. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AETC/DOF recommends that the applicant not be reinstated...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00556
Reason for his elimination from training shown on the AF Form 475, and AETC Forms 126A, and 240-5 Summary of Record of Training is Drop-on- Request (DOR). AETC/A3F complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPEP recommends approval to correct the 12 December 2002 training report if the AETC Form 126A and AETC 240-5 forms are corrected as recommended by AETC/A3F. NOVEL Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-00556 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the...