RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02705
INDEX CODE: 108.07
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 FEBRUARY 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His service-connected medical condition, Intervertebral Disc Syndrome, be
assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The circumstances which led to his injury were hostile conditions in a
combat zone. Jumping from a helicopter with equipment landing and then
having to run in a crouched position to avoid enemy fire are what caused
his spine injury. The actions taken to avoid fire and the resultant disc
condition have probably been more life altering than being wounded.
In support of his request, applicant provides a personal statement and a
copy of his CRSC application with associated documents. His complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 31 July 1991, the applicant retired from the Air Force in the grade of
lieutenant colonel, after serving 24 years, 1 month, and 13 days on active
duty.
On 19 August 2004, the applicant’s original request for CRSC for his back
condition was disapproved. He appealed the decision, along with requesting
CRSC for other conditions associated with exposure to Agent Orange. His
appeal was partially approved on 17 August 2005; however, his back
condition was again disapproved.
Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a VA Rating
Decision, dated 19 February 1992, compensable rating of 10% for his
unfitting condition.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD advises that available evidence in his
service record does not substantiate the applicant’s description of the
events leading up to his injury. Additionally, there is medical evidence
that indicates his back condition began prior to September 1967, which was
well before his tour in Vietnam. DPPD advises that without some evidence
from the period of service which corroborates his claims, DPPD is unable to
justify approval of CRSC.
The DPPD complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant states he knows that his back injury was a result of lifting a
heavy generator from a helicopter in a “hot landing zone” and running for
cover while carrying it in a crouched position. If he had been in non-
hostile, non-life threatening lifting conditions, utilizing proper body
mechanics, the injury would not have happened. Applicant states that the
September 1967 medical entry was done while he was in pilot training. He
was flying the T-37 trainer and had a parachute strapped to his back. This
type of complaint was a common occurrence with student pilots and to
alleviate the problem, inflatable kidney packs were readily available. If
this had been a “chronic condition,” there would have been additional
evidence of this in his medical history over the next three and one half
yeas prior to the Vietnam injury. The applicant’s complete letter, is at
Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available
evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical
condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred as the
direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the
performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an
instrumentality of war, and therefore, does not qualify for compensation
under the CRSC Act. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-02705
in Executive Session on 16 January 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2004-
02705 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Aug 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 2 Oct 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Oct 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 27 Oct 06.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01275
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01275 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 OCT 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine and left knee condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02648
His CRSC application was disapproved on 6 May 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be combat- related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states his injuries, while not sustained by a bullet in a firefight, were incurred while in the same locations and ensuring helicopters were ready to perform their mission. We agree...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02768
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His condition is the result of many years of hazardous parachute duties in both the Army and Air Force Special Operations Forces as light infantryman on extreme training operations and exercises; and, from over 100 parachute jumps, many of which are described as "multiple hard landings." There are no records of treatment for injuries to either foot incurred as a result of parachute jumps and service...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02604
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02604 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Feb 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her service-connected medical condition, spinal disc condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02461
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02461 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 Jan 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, intervertegral disc syndrome, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC)...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03342
The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Dec 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00131
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00131 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 JUL 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, degenerative arthritis of the spine, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01153
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01153 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 DEC 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, spinal disc condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04306
A review of his medical records reveals no record of such injuries, although while stationed at Kadena AB, he injured his back lifting furniture. The Medical Consultant states he asserts his back was injured during a rocket attack in Vietnam either by falling off a helicopter or when a comrade fell on his back seeking shelter. He also asserts his back and knee conditions were caused by his duties during aerial flight.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02048
DPPD states the applicant believes his back condition is directly related to performing aircrew duties. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify...