ADDENDUM
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1996-02696
INDEX CODE: 100.03
COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Separation Program Designator code (SPD) be changed from GKI
(Involuntary Discharge Recommended by Board, Sexual Perversion) to FHC
(Voluntary Separation to Enlist and Retire) or another code that would
allow him to enlist in the Army National Guard.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was experiencing several stressful situations while on active duty
that subsequently led him to make mistakes and eventually a court-
martial. If given the opportunity he would be an asset to the Guard.
On 1 June 2006, the applicant submitted additional supporting
documentation. He provided a personal statement, two Letters of
Recommendation, and documents related to his post service. He states
he was at a low point in his life and made mistakes that led to his
court-martial. During that time, he was not thinking or acting with a
clear head and believes his poor marriage was a factor in his job
performance.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
G.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 27 May 1997, the applicant's request to change his discharge to
honorable and change the narrative reason for separation was
considered and denied by the Board. For an accounting of the facts
and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and, the
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of
Proceedings at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of
the documentation provided in support of his appeal and the evidence
of record, it is our opinion that given the circumstances surrounding
his separation from the Air Force, the narrative reason for separation
and SPD code assigned to the applicant, appear to be in compliance
with the governing Air Force Instructions. We find no evidence of
error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation
that has been submitted in support of his appeal, we do not believe he
has suffered from an injustice. Therefore, based on the available
evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider
this application.
2. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-1996-
02696 in Executive Session on 24 May 2007, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Mr. Mark J. Novitski, Member
Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 6 Aug 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit G. DD Form 149, dated 22 Jun 06, w/atchs.
B. J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2005-00960-3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation and the rationale for the earlier decisions by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F and the Addendum to the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H. In a DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States, dated 27 April 2007, the applicant requests reconsideration. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit I. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00993
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00993 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 OCT 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed; however, it appears that his request is to have his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3D (second term or...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01255
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01255 INDEX CODE: 100.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 OCT 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4E (Grade is A1C or below and the airman completed 31 or more months (55 months for six-year enlistees), if a first-term airman; or,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00960-2
She was issued an RE code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge or an entry level separation), and an SPD code of JFX, which correlates to a narrative reason of discharge for Personality Disorder. On 21 Jun 06, the Board agreed with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s determination that the case should be denied because her Adjustment Disorder placed her and the Air Force at an unacceptable risk for a recurrence of her symptoms should she be exposed again to the stressful...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00456-2
However, since no new and relevant evidence has been provided, we find the request does not meet the criteria for reconsideration. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application....
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2002-03005-2
Based on the opinion of the BCMR Medical Consultant that the condition leading to his separation was an “Adjustment Disorder” rather than a “Personality Disorder,” the Board concluded the applicant’s records should be changed to show he received an honorable discharge under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2, (Secretarial Authority), with Separation Program Designator (SPD) code “KFF.” However, the Board found the RE Code issued at the time of the applicant’s separation accurately...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00870
DPPPR’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment on 8 April 2005. We took notice of the applicant’s contention that her late husband should be awarded the KDSM for time served in Korea; however, sufficient evidence has not been presented to substantiate this claim. We thoroughly reviewed the former...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03978
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided a personal statement and a copy of his point credit summary and his AGR application. As of 10 May 2006, he has almost 10 years of active duty time. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National Guard office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01784
DPFC states that according to a War Department Form 372-A, Final Payment-Work Sheet, and the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, the applicant enlisted in the Army Air Force on 11 June 1946 and was discharged on 7 June 1949. The applicant contends he should be awarded Prisoner of War status. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 2007-01784 in Executive Session on 26 July 2007, under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00020
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not issued the PH medal while in service. DPPPR states to be awarded the PH a member must provide documentation to support that wounds were from a direct result of enemy action and that the wounds required or received medical treatment by medical personnel. The complete DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...