RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03256
INDEX CODE: 100.03
xxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or
career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP)
be changed to allow enlistment in the Guard or Reserves.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When he was on active duty he did have difficulty passing his seven-level
skill test. He had extreme test anxiety and difficulty studying. He has
been diagnosed with Adult Attention Deficit Disorder. He chose to accept
the Date of Separation Roll Back so he could complete his college
education. He was not told by the personnel office that when he separated
he would receive an RE code that would prevent him from further enlistment.
He does not understand why he would receive this code. His EPRs while on
active duty were excellent. In his last EPR he was rated a 5. During his
service, he received an Air Force Commendation Medal and four Air Force
Achievement Medals. He has been diagnosed with Adult ADD and has received
training to modify his studying and testing techniques. He has had
positive results with these techniques including earning his Bachelor
Degree in Business Management.
In support of his request, applicant provides a personal statement, a copy
of his DD Form 214, a letter of recommendation and a copy of his Report on
Individual Person. The applicant’s submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 7 August 1985. He was
progressively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant, having assumed that
grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 January 1993. Since his
promotion to the grade of sergeant, he received eight Enlisted Performance
Reports for the combined rating period 2 November 1988 through 12 December
1994, in which the overall ratings were 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5 (highest
rating a 5).
Applicant was honorably discharged for completion of required active
service on 29 January 1995, after serving 9 years, 5 months and 23 days on
active duty. An RE code 2X (First-term second-term or career airman
considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) was given.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. DPPAE states that a
review of his report on individual personnel (RIP) dated 4 October 1994 and
documents submitted in his application revealed that his promotion and
assignment eligibility status was updated as ineligible/denied reenlistment
and applicant was withdrawn from upgrade training for failure to progress.
The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 3 December 2004, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was sent to the
applicant for review and comment. As of this date, this office has not
received a response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice that would warrant a change to his RE code.
Evidence has not been provided that would lead us to believe that the
applicant’s discharge in 1995 was erroneous or unjust. Therefore, we have
no basis to conclude that the corresponding RE code that was assigned at
the time of his separation does not accurately reflect the circumstances of
his separation. In the absence of evidence to indicate that the
information contained in his records is erroneous or that his commander
abused his discretionary authority, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application AFBCMR
Docket BC-2004-03256 in Executive Session on 9 February 2005, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr, Panel Chair
Ms. Ann-Cecile M. McDermott, Member
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Feb 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 30 Nov 04.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Dec 04.
ROSCOE HINTON JR.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-01027
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that at the time of his
discharge on 29 August 1999, he was issued a Reenlistment Eligibility
(RE) code of “3K” rather than “2X.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02137
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03 for review and response. No evidence has been provided which would lead us to believe that the applicant’s evaluators were unable to render an unbiased evaluation of his performance or that the ratings on the contested report were based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01193
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01193 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2X” be changed. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03330
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03330 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. However, the code he received had its basis in his nonselection for reenlistment. We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00837 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02924 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 January...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00928
The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that before recommending the discharge, the applicant was given ample opportunity to study and prepare for his Career Development Course (CDC). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 4 June 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03701
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03701 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to show a favorable discharge and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and to either be compensated monetarily or be credited for 20 years of service. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00555
His complete submittion is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant has not satisfactorily indicated the commander’s action to deny reenlistment was inappropriate or not in compliance with Air Force policy. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01027
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01027 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed to allow reenlistment. Prior to 16 October 1998, his denial of reenlistment,...