AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03354
AFBCMR BC-2003-03354 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03357
The evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 February 2004, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. The applicant contends the contested EPR is unjust, she was given an initial feedback but never received a midterm, and she had no indication of substandard performance. We note she received promotion Below-the-Zone during...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03358
He then enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 September 1986. In 2002, the applicant accepted the CSB and was later informed he was not eligible for the CSB based on his DIEUS and recoupment of the bonus would be initiated. AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, states date initial entry uniformed service (DIEUS) is the enlisted service from the date of initial enlistment in any branch of the Armed Forces (Regular or Reserves; active or inactive).
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03360
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03360 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect that he was not provided a complete dental examination and all appropriate dental services and treatment within 90 days prior...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03361
In May 92, the commander permanently decertified the applicant from the PRP based on the recommendation from the MHC that, although he did not suffer any specific disorder, the applicant’s personality traits, preoccupation with personal problems, difficulty in adjusting to shift changes, and marginal motivation had not improved with treatment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRSP notes the applicant was discharged involuntarily upon expiration of term of service...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03363
DPPPR notes the applicant has applied for the DFC and PHM several times since 1997. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, however, after review of his submission and the evidence of what little record there is available, we are of the opinion that he met the requirement for award of the DFC (number of missions flown and award of six Air Medals) and feel as though he provided enough documentation to show he was recommended for the award of the DFC. FREDERICK R. BEAMAN, III Panel...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03364
They indicated there is no evidence the applicant was assigned to any unit which was awarded the PUC. An individual is only entitled to share in a unit award of the unit to which he/she is assigned during the unit award period. Therefore, since he was not assigned to any unit awarded the PUC, he is not eligible to share in the PUC awarded to other units.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03365
Since the 7th and 13th Air Forces’ Decoration Review Boards reviewed all decorations at that time, they were in the best position to determine which recommendations for the BSM should be awarded and which should be downgraded to the AFCM in order to provide consistency in decorations. DPPPR concluded by stating that the applicant has not made any effort for almost 30 years to have his AFCM (1OLC) upgraded; has not provided any documents showing he submitted a request for upgrade through...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03366
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or 7200 or more Reserve retired points. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that relief should be granted.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03367
Members of the Board, Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Ms. Martha Maust, and Ms. Carolyn B. Willis considered this application on 2 March 2004. Ltr, AFPC/DPPPWB, dtd 26 Jan 04 AFBCMR BC-2003-03367 INDEX CODE: 100.00, 110.03, 128.00, 131.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03370
The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, indicates he was released under the provisions of AFR 39- 10, Expiration Term of Service on 28 July 1987, in the rank of senior airman and transferred to the Air Force Reserves. Airmen are eligible for NCO status if they have completed 12 months time in grade. Although the applicant was authorized NCO status, the applicant submits insufficient evidence he applicant was recommended for or promoted to SSgt/ E-5.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03371
DPP states that all of his active Federal service was correctly credited towards a Reserve retirement. After a thorough review of the evidence of record, it appears that the applicant's creditable service was computed correctly and has been properly applied to his service record. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003- 03371 in Executive Session on 8 Jan 04, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03374
A member who was married during the Plan’s initial enrollment period authorized by Public Law (PL) 92-425, which established the SBP, and failed to provide SBP coverage for that eligible spouse beneficiary, may not later elect coverage for that person, or another person of the same category, unless Congress authorizes an open enrollment. The applicant has provided no compelling evidence that justifies extending a fifth opportunity for him to provide SBP coverage for his wife. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03375
Prior to his 1 December 1979 retirement, the applicant elected child only SBP coverage based on full retired pay. DPPTR further states to approve this request would provide the applicant an additional opportunity to elect SBP coverage not afforded to other retired servicemembers similarly situated. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03376
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Disagreement between the USAF and the US Navy (USN) on determining awarding authority of the AM prevented its inclusion in his officer selection records (OSR) and its consideration by the promotion board. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPO does not support the applicant’s contention that disagreements between the USAF and USN on...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03377
In support of her request, applicant provided documentation associated with the investigation into the allegations against her, documentation associated with her administrative demotion action, and documentation associated with her referral EPR. The IG analysis concluded the preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion the adverse administrative actions taken against her were based solely on the evidence supporting the action and not because protected disc1osures had been made to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03382
Applicant discusses the DVA’s determination regarding his medical condition. In 2001, over 6 years following the applicant’s discharge, the DVA added Adult Onset Diabetes to the list of diseases associated with Agent Orange exposure for purposes of granting presumptive service connected disability compensation under Title 38. Title 38, Section 1116 is the law that provides for the DVA to grant service connected disability benefits for certain diseases that develop after discharge that may...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03385
The member and Constance married on 12 June 1992, but he failed to elect SBP coverage for her within the first year following their marriage. Absent a valid election within the first year of his marriage, the applicant could have elected coverage for his wife during this period, but he failed to do so. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03390
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03390 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, neck strain, chronic low back pain, hemorrhoids and impairment of sphincter control, ingrown toenails, sinusitis, tinnitus, and hypertension, be assessed as combat related in order to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03391
These matters were considered in review of the sentence. The AFPC/DPPPWB evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 27 February 2004 for review and response. Notwithstanding the above, after reviewing the evidence of record, to include the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) action to upgrade the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03392
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to the circumstances of her case, she should have been discharged under a hardship reason, not pregnancy or childbirth. The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman first class, was discharged from the Air Force on 31 December 2001 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen (pregnancy or childbirth), with an honorable discharge. A complete copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03393
At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. In regards to the applicant’s request for correction of his RE code, no documentation was provided to the Board, to show a record of satisfactory post service accomplishments. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03399
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the applicant was discharged due to depression and post traumatic stress disorder which required hospitalization. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 March...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03400
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03400 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reconsidered for promotion to the grade of major, Professional Military Education (PME), and reinstatement to active duty, by Special Selection Boards (SSBs) for the Calendar Years 1994 (CY94) through 1998B Major Line Central Selection Boards. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03404
There are two mechanisms provided by law for changing SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse, and both must be exercised within the first year following the divorce. The servicemember can file an election change or the former spouse can request that the change be made on their behalf. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03408
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommended denial and stated officers considered by promotion boards have different closeout dates for their performance reports. However, neither the applicant nor the rater explained what efforts were made prior to the board to ensure the OPR was filed in time for consideration. However, his rater asserts that it was his intention that the contested report be a matter of record at the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03416
As a result of a previous Board decision to correct his military records, he was supplementally considered and selected for promotion to the grade of senior master sergeant, with a date of rank and effective date retroactive to 1 Dec 01. ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-03416 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of I have carefully reviewed all of the circumstances of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03425
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03425 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: By amendment, his effective date of advancement to the grade of master sergeant on the retired list be changed to his original date of advancement to the grade of master sergeant. Effective 6 Oct 00, the applicant was advanced to the grade of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03426
In this respect, we note that the governing instruction in effect at the time of the applicant’s discharge provided that members applying for pregnancy separation had the option to elect to be released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve or to be discharged. The applicant has not provided any evidence to show that she requested a release from active duty and transfer to the Air Force Reserve. ___________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03429
This degree is an academic and professional equivalent to the degree obtained after graduation from a School of Medicine in the United States. When a degree level and/or degree, not Air Force sponsored, are not accurately reflected in the personnel system then the member is required to contact AFIT. After reviewing the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that the applicant’s records are in error or that he has been the victim of an injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03430
The commander, before imposing nonjudicial punishment, must notify the servicemember of the nature of the charged offense(s), the evidence supporting the offense, and the commander's intent to impose nonjudical punishment. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request for removal of the Article 15 imposed on 28 May 1998 from her records. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03431
Upon receipt of her separation document she contacted SSgt C--- from the Separations Branch regarding correction of the date of separation, which she states should have been 30 August 2002 instead of 6 July 2002. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was not discharged on 6 July 2002, but was continued on active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03434
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied. Although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, DPW states her spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 30 June 2003. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 20 April 2004, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03435
He entered active duty in the Army of the United States on 21 Aug 41, in the temporary grade of first lieutenant. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03437
The MEB recommended she be continued on active duty and referred her records to the IPEB for evaluation. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her response to the Air Force evaluations, the applicant stated she is very bothered by the Air Force advisories.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03438
The DPAPP1 evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 Dec 03 for review and comment within 30 days. We thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and found no documentation to support the applicant's assertion that his records should be amended to reflect that he was stationed in England. Therefore, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03441
On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, that there is no record of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03443
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B and C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied. DPW states that Air Force leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of this new program and that the applicant had adequate time to make an election decision. In regard to the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03452
On 15 May 03, applicant requested voluntary separation from the Air Force. After review, the Medical Consultant recommends denial and states she was medically disqualified from the air traffic control career field due to migraine headaches. Therefore, we recommend her records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03459
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03459 INDEX CODE 112.05 128.14 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Initial Entry into Military Service/Uniform Service (DIEMS)/(DIEUS) be changed from 17 Apr 86 to 1 Aug 86 so he may retain his Career Status Bonus (CSB). However, since his date of enlistment in the Regular Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03461
Other than his own assertions, there is no indication in the record before us that that the rater did not have reasonable information available concerning the applicant’s performance during the contested rating period on which to base a reasonably accurate assessment. Additionally, we note that the rater on the contested report was in the applicant’s rating chain on the preceding report which, in our view, supports the position that the rater was familiar with the applicant and was aware of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03463
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Ms. Mary Johnson, and Ms. Rita S. Looney considered this application on 4 February 2004. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPPO, dtd 8 Dec 03, with attachment AFBCMR BC-2003-03463 INDEX CODE:...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03471
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03471 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to participate in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program. His records reflect his decision to disenroll from the MGIB. After serving over five years and paying the required $1200, the Air Force states that he elected not to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03472
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03472 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. Administrative personnel advised him that he should apply for the PH Medal, but due to the confusion at the time and the fact that he left Vietnam within two weeks he never completed the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03474
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03474 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions). These matters were considered in review of the sentence. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03475
DPM states that the transcript provided reflects 52 quarters at the time of enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the transcripts provided by the applicant reflect that upon the date of her enlistment she had completed only 52 quarter hours. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03480
In January 1973, he was thoroughly evaluated by Orthopedic Services with negative results. On 20 January 2004, the Air Force office of primary responsibility requested the applicant provide a more detailed account of the circumstances regarding the injuries he received in Vietnam on 10 January 1969. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR states the PH is awarded for injuries or wounds incurred as a direct result of enemy action;...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03481
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03481 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code which will enable him to reenlist in another...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03484
The HQ AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 23 April 2004 for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03485
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03485 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would allow enlistment in the Marines. In accordance with his agreement with the Air Force, on 19 July 1999, he requested voluntary separation due to non-fulfillment of...