RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03431
INDEX CODE: 136.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The date on her separation document be changed from 6 July 2002 to 30
August 2002, and that she be given two weeks’ pay.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was advised by the Separations Branch at Eglin AFB to submit a request
for a “Stop Loss” waiver. The date requested on her waiver was the date
she was eligible to separate. She also requested and was approved terminal
leave. She was notified in the 1st week of June 2002 that her waiver had
been approved. She states that all necessary offices and her Commander
agreed upon date of 30 August 2002, however she had read in a memo that the
actual approval date was 22 May 2002.
In September of 2002, she realized that she had not received a final
paycheck. Upon receipt of her separation document she contacted SSgt C---
from the Separations Branch regarding correction of the date of separation,
which she states should have been 30 August 2002 instead of 6 July 2002.
She followed up with SSgt C--- over the next few months; however he was
reassigned to a new station, and no one at the office had knowledge of her
case. She was then provided with an application and instructions to
correct her records.
In support of her request, the applicant has submitted copies of her
separation documents. The applicant’s complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 22 May 1989, the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve of
the Air Force (Nurse Corps), and was voluntarily ordered to extended active
duty for a period of 36 months on 11 October 1989. She was integrated into
the Regular Air Force on 25 August 1997 and has been progressively promoted
to the grade of captain, effective and with a date of rank of 1 August
1993.
The applicant’s records contain a DD Form 2648, Preseparation Counseling
Checklist, which the applicant signed on 19 March 2002, containing, among
other things, an expected separation date “20020706.” The applicant’s
separation orders, issued on 19 June 2002, indicated that the applicant
would be discharged effective 30 August 2002.
According to her separation document (DD Form 214), which she was
unavailable to sign, the applicant was honorably discharged on 6 July
2002 under the provisions of AFI 36-3207 (Completion of Required Active
Service). She was credited with 12 years, 8 months and 26 days on active
duty. Her separation document further indicated no leave was sold at the
time of discharge. On 17 December 2002, an amendment to the applicant’s
separation orders was issued changing the applicant’s discharge date to
6 July 2002.
Information provided by the Defense Accounting and Finance Service (DFAS)
indicates that the applicant took two days of terminal leave for the period
5 July 2002 to 6 July 2002 and that she sold 50 days of unused accrued
annual leave at the time of her separation.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request based on the
documentation on file in the master personnel records and the military
personnel data system. DPPRS stated that, according to the Military
Personnel Data System (MilPDS), the applicant’s Stop Loss waiver was
approved on 22 May 2002 and her date of separation was established 6 July
2002. There is no record on file showing a date of separation of 30 August
2002. DPPRS indicates that the applicant has not submitted any new
evidence identifying any errors or injustice occurred during her discharge
processing (see Exhibit C).
DFAS-POCC/DE reviewed this application and noted the conflicting
information concerning a discharge effective date in her records. DFAS-
POCC/DE recommended that further information be provided by the Separation
Division and her last duty station (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reiterates her initial contentions in a statement dated 27
January 2004 at Exhibit F.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After reviewing the applicant’s
submission, we believe that an injustice occurred when her initial date of
separation (DOS) was amended. The discharge order indicated the applicant
had an established DOS of 30 August 2002; however, the separation document
specified 6 July 2002 as her DOS. The applicant contacted the separations
branch regarding the discrepancy in her DOS date, and that office issued an
amendment to the discharge order, correcting the separation date to 6 July
2002 instead of 30 August 2002. Since no documentation or justification
exists regarding how the initial DOS was established and changed to the
earlier date, we are inclined to resolve any doubt in this matter in favor
of the applicant. We recommend that the records be corrected as indicated
below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was not discharged on 6 July
2002, but was continued on active duty until 30 August 2002, on which date
she was honorably discharged.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 22 April 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Oct 2003, with attachments.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated.10 Dec 03,
with attachments.
Exhibit D. Letter, DFAS-POCC/DE, dated 30 Dec 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Jan 04.
ROBERT S. BOYD
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-03431
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that she was not discharged on
6 July 2002, but was continued on active duty until 30 August 2002, on
which date she was honorably discharged.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
-----------------------
[pic]
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00784
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03076
She didn’t receive a copy of the voucher at the time it was filed. By letter dated 17 October 2002, the Directorate of Debt and Claims Management, DFAS-Denver, notified the applicant that her request for waiver was denied. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-POCC/DE states that the Remission and Waiver Branch informed them that the applicant had filed a waiver application and they provided a copy of the letter that was sent to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03076
She didn’t receive a copy of the voucher at the time it was filed. By letter dated 17 October 2002, the Directorate of Debt and Claims Management, DFAS-Denver, notified the applicant that her request for waiver was denied. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-POCC/DE states that the Remission and Waiver Branch informed them that the applicant had filed a waiver application and they provided a copy of the letter that was sent to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02194
At the time of her separation she had been disqualified from Air Traffic Control duties and had been continued on active duty awaiting waivers and Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) processing. With regard to the presence of medical conditions that were potentially disqualifying for controller duties, the Medical Consultant states the fact that she decided to voluntarily separate under pregnancy provisions rather than remain on active duty and complete the planned evaluations and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01504
JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXX, BC-2005-01504 I have carefully considered all the circumstances of this case and do not agree with the majority members that the applicant should not be relieved of the debt for the unearned portion of the initial enlistment bonus she received. In support of her request, the applicant submits a statement from...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03541
DFAS-POCC/DE states the applicant was discharged with an SPD code of MND. The applicant asserts that he was told by his officers that he would not have to repay his SEB when he voluntarily submitted a request for separation under the LADSC Waiver Program. JAMES W. RUSSELL III Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-03541 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02073
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02073 INDEX CODE: 110.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 Jan 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Extended Active Duty (EAD) date be changed from 25 Oct 05 to 11 Aug 05 to prevent a break in service, restore her promotion line number, and clear a debt for back pay and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01234
However, the recoupment of bonus monies is driven by the assigned SPD code. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. DFAS-POCC/DE recommends the applicant’s request to change his SPD code be denied. The applicant originally requested his RE code also be changed; however, AFPC/DPPRSP has administratively corrected his records to reflect he was issued RE code “1J.” Applicant’s contentions regarding the separation program designator (SPD) he was assigned at the time of his discharge are...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01739
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was commissioned an officer in the Reserve of the Air Force on 7 February 1997. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPPRS recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00785
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...