DPPPWB further states the Air Force, after 56 years and limited records, cannot determine if the applicant should have been promoted earlier than he was. Therefore based on the rationale provided they recommend denying the applicant’s request (Exhibit D). He further states that he was promoted at the time of his discharge and the promotion was not affiliated with his flying years, the practice at that time was to promote each enlisted man one grade at time of discharge (Exhibit F).
His complete submission is at Exhibit A. Based on the evidence of record and that verified by HQ Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC), the applicant was properly credited for all of the service which he performed during his career, including the credit of 304 points (which equates to 10 months) of active duty he received for Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 3 August 1962. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
There was no evidence that the service member made an election at that time. Therefore, based on the evidence provided they recommend denying the applicant’s request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03532 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code be changed to allow him to enlist in the Mississippi Air National Guard. Applicant's EPR profile reflects the following: PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION 17 Dec 95 2 2 Aug 96...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air...
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPTR reviewed this application and recommended denial. In Jul 01, former spouse coverage was established...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03544 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an under honorable (general) conditions discharge. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, the Board majority is not persuaded to recommend upgrading the discharge. In...
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. DPW states that the Board disapprove The DPW evaluation is attached at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03558 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate...
The commander was recommending that applicant receive an honorable discharge. In an effort to study and pass the second final testing, he and his trainer reviewed the CDC course material. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and provided letters of recommendation, a letter from his congressman, an application for an Air Force Reserve position, and a letter from the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03571 INDEX CODE:110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the active duty he performed in the Persian Gulf and some awards and ribbons in particular his overseas short tour ribbon and another ribbon for his TDY during DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM. The...
The applicant states that on 18 October 2001 she indicated her intent to submit an appeal to the Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) via the formal board. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting her present request for further consideration by the AFPB while she is receiving her current 60% disability. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair AFBCMR 01-03585 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
On 6 Sep 1985, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Early Separation Program – Strength Reduction) in the grade of airman first class with an honorable characterization of service and an RE code of 2X [First term airman considered but not selected under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)]. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE reviewed this application and indicated that the RE code 2X is correct. ...
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his Individual Flight Records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s available military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. His Individual Flight Records show that he...
HQ USAF/JAG states the applicant served exactly four years on active duty as an enlisted member. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). The applicant did not meet the requirement of having served on active duty as an enlisted member for over 4 years to be eligible to receive O-1E pay.
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 Jul 59 and was discharged on 20 May 63 with an undesirable discharge. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s reconstructed military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. In response to the Board's request, the FBI provided a copy of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03613 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRS states Air Force policy is that...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03621 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading his RE Code. ...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and recommended denial. ...
The ARPC/DPS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 February 2002 for review and response within 30 days. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that relief should be granted. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03638 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation be changed on her DD Form 214 and her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her the opportunity to reenter the Air Force. In this respect, it appears that the narrative...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. On 3 Aug 92, he was appointed a 2nd Lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force, Medical Service Corp (MSC). A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AFBCMR 01-03650 INDEX CODE: 131.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice. In this respect, we note that the applicant’s discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing Air Force Regulation in effect at the time of his separation and he was afforded all the rights to which entitled. Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the deceased member’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the...
A xxxx informed him that all he would need to do was complete DD Form 2656-2, Termination of SBP Request, have his spouse sign the request and forward the completed form to DFAS for processing. The applicant contends that he was improperly counseled about the options of having SBP reinstated at a future date. The applicant wanted to terminate his SBP coverage for his spouse immediately.
A 16 November 1943, medical record entry indicates that the applicant was treated for an infected forehead wound when he was cut by coral while swimming at Moresby beach on 11 November 1943. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that to be awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support that he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action that must have...
He served 3 years, 3 months and 27 days of total active service with no time lost. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00003 INDEX NUMBER: 113.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His extended active duty date (EAD) be changed from 26 May 01 to 24 May 01. The Traffic Management Office at Hill and Mountain Home Air Force Bases allowed early travel. We took notice of the applicant's...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00004 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the CY98C and CY99A Colonel Selection Board be corrected to reflect his correct duty history and that he receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of colonel for...
The close-out date of his Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 3 Jun 98 through 14 Jan 99 be changed to reflect a date prior to 30 Dec 98. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00007 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant requests that his “2C” reentry (RE) code, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service” be changed to “3C,” “First Term airman not...
INDEX CODE 128.05 AFBCMR 02-00009 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
In support of her appeal, the applicant provided a letter from the Houston Medical Center, dated 19 October 1998, and an Employee Payroll History from 1 August 1997 through 31 December 1998. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPMAF2, dated 17 January 2002, w/atchs. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 January 2002.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00017 INDEX NUMBER: 100.07;110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 28, “Narrative Reason for Separation,” of his DD Form 214, “Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty” be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Secretarial Authority.” His records...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00025 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he incurred a service-connected illness while on active duty and was medically discharged. The applicant underwent a separation physical on 15 August 1977, during which he denied any medical...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00026 INDEX CODE: 112.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His enlistment grade be corrected to E-3 and awarded back pay and allowances from his 9 April 2001 date of enlistment (DOE). Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took...
The commander then had his administrative support staff complete the necessary leave forms and had them write in “member not available to sign” since the applicant had already departed. The Board was persuaded by the detailed account of events provided by the applicant. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that five (5) days of...
AFBCMR 02-00031 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After a careful consideration of the applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, a majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. ...
Public Law (PL) 92-425, which established the SBP on 21 September 1972, authorized an 18-month enrollment period for retired members to elect SBP coverage. There were no provisions in the laws during either of these open enrollment periods requiring the Services to notify a spouse if the member did not enroll. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their...
His reduction to the grade of E-1 be remitted and he be reinstated to the grade of staff sergeant. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLSA/JAJM reviewed applicant's request and recommends denial. If the Board feels it is in the best interest of the Air Force to retain the member, it should restore his grade to staff sergeant or grant a HYT waiver to extend him until December 2005.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00042 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect medals for service while on temporary duty (TDY) to Takhli, Thailand. Unfortunately, the applicant’s records do not reflect that he was deployed to Thailand in direct support of operations in...
The current AFI that regulates separations for mental health problems does not allow coding for other than “Personality Disorder,” an entirely different DSM-IV code sequence from that with which the applicant was diagnosed. Based on the evidence provided, DPPRS recommends changing block 28 on his DD 214 from "Personality Disorder" to "Secretarial Authority" with a Separation Program designator of "JFF" (Exhibit E). ...
However, should the Board void the OPRs, she should receive SSB consideration for the CY00A board since both OPRs were on file for that board. The AFPC/DPPPO evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 22 February 2002 for review and response within 30 days. ...