RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03657
INDEX CODE: 100.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
This application was submitted by the mother of the deceased
servicemember.
She requests that the deceased member’s funeral expenses be paid by
the Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the deceased member’s military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/JA reviewed this application and recommended denial. A
complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 15 Feb 02 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3.Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant’s
deceased son has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission
of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket No. 01-03657
in Executive Session on 26 March 2002, under the provisions of Air
Force Instruction 36-2603:
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Panel Chair
Mr. Billy C. Baxter, Member
Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Jan 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/JA, dated 7 Feb 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Feb 02.
PHILIP SHEUERMAN
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03445 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. On 28 Sep 54, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the member’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. After thoroughly...
_______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. _______________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02510 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His erroneous enlistment be removed from his records and he be allowed to reenlist in the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02615
This change was not grandfathered to prior service members that returned to active duty prior to the date of publication of the change. Applicant’s adjusted date of separation was more than 2 years but less than 4 years; therefore, applicant received 25% of time in grade of E-5 and date of rank was established as 10 Feb 00. Effective 18 Dec 01 AFI 36-2604, para 8.2, was changed to read, “prior service enlisted returning to active duty in the same grade, before the fourth anniversary of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01022
Additionally, since the citations filed in the Officer Selection Record (OSR) should mirror the decorations displayed on the OSB, the only way to ensure the board members were aware that he received this award would have been to write a letter to the board president for each respective board. The Air Force advisory states the only way the applicant could ensure the board members were aware of his award was to write the board president for each respective board. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR,...
She admits the facts of the case, but contends that the characterization of the discharge should be “honorable” instead of “general.” She feels that her service “deserves an Honorable characterization.” She explains that the reason she disobeyed the orders was because she was worried that the anthrax vaccination would make her sick, and no one could satisfactorily answer her questions concerning the safety of the vaccine. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02727
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02727 INDEX CODE: 111.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 29 Jun 01 through 10 Feb 02, be removed from his records. Evidence has not been presented which would lead us to believe the contested report is not a true and accurate...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03151 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may reenlist in the military. Therefore, the commander felt that it would be in the best interest of the Air Force and the applicant that he separate from the service. On 25...
On 2 Nov 00, applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force as an E-3, and was given a DOR equal to her date of enlistment (DOE). AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, is the governing directive for computing dates of ranks. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...