RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03638
INDEX CODE: 110.00
APPLICANT COUNSEL: None
SSN HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The narrative reason for separation be changed on her DD Form 214 and
her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her the
opportunity to reenter the Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered the regular Air Force as an airman on 10
June 1998 for a period of four (4) years.
The applicant's commander directed her for a mental health evaluation.
On 24 February 1999, the applicant was evaluated by a clinical
psychologist, with the diagnosis Personality Disorder with borderline
and antisocial traits.
The applicant's commander initiated discharge actions on 2 March 1999
for Mental Disorders. The applicant was honorably discharged on 13
April 1999; she served 10 months of active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the referral to mental
health indicated the severe nature of her problems with interacting in
the military environment and adapting to military standards and
expectations. The applicant was diagnosed with an unsuiting condition
of adjustment and personality disorder, which was appropriately used
to separate her administratively. The Medical Consultant further
states, that service members who have a history of attempting suicide
are ineligible for reenlistment in accordance with AFI 48-123,
Attachment 3, paragraph A3.23.5. Therefore based on the evidence
provided the Medical Consultant recommends denying the requested
relief (Exhibit C).
AFPC/DPPRS states that based on the documentation in the applicant's
records, they believe that the applicant's discharge was consistent
with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation and that the discharge was within the sound discretion of
discharge authority. DPPRS further states that the applicant has not
submitted any new evidence or identified any errors or injustices that
may have occurred during her discharge processing. The applicant has
not provided any supporting documentation to warrant a change in the
narrative reason of her separation. Therefore, based on the evidence
provided they recommend denying the requested relief.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPPAE states the applicant received the appropriate RE code of
"2C" which reflects that she received an involuntary separation with
an honorable discharge, or entry-level separation without service
characterization (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
28 June 2002, for review and response. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of
the circumstances of this case and the evidence provided by the
applicant, we are not persuaded that the applicant's narrative reason
and the reenlistment code she received were in error or unjust. In
this respect, it appears that the narrative reason denotes the reason
for her administrative discharge and RE code "2C" accurately indicates
the member was involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge.
The applicant has not provided persuasive documentation indicating
that the processing of her discharge was unjust or erroneous. While
the applicant’s contentions are duly noted, we agree with the opinions
and recommendations of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not established that
she has been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 01-
03638 in Executive Session on 4 September 2002, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Member
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, 12 Dec 01 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFCMR Medical Consultant, dated 28 Jan 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 25 Feb 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 18 Jun 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jun 02.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Vice Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00929 INDEX CODE 110.02 100.06 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her “2C” (Involuntarily Separated with an Honorable Discharge) reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one allowing reenlistment, and the narrative reason for her discharge be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Failure...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03101 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to enlist in the Air Force, or in the alternative, her RE code be waived to allow her enlistment in the Air Force. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02903
He received an RE code of 2C, which defined means “Involuntary separation with honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant found that no change to applicant’s record was warranted. AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE verified that the RE code of 2C was correct. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01129
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01129 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed to allow her to reenlist. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE states, in part, that the RE Code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01488
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01488 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be upgraded to 1 and that her uncharacterized entry level separation be changed to an honorable discharge. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPRS recommends the narrative reason for the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00647 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation code be changed. The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was administratively separated due to an adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, and traits of a personality disorder. On...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00655 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his separation be changed from Personality Disorder to Hardship Discharge and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed. Although action and disposition in this case are proper and equitable...
He received an RE Code of 2C, which defined means "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01729
DPPRS states that based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Additionally, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, and he provided no facts warranting a change to his RE code. The complete DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02947
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02947 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would allow her to enlist in the Air National Guard. She served 3 months and 8 days on active duty and was issued an RE code of...