RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02881 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to reflect "1C," vice "2C." He was separated on 30 May 01. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military...
AFBCMR 01-02950 INDEX CODE: 110.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
The LES for July 1985 indicates that he entered active duty on 12 Jun 85 with 4.5 days of accrued leave. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSFM reviewed applicant's request and recommends that his records be corrected as...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW reviewed this application and recommended denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03025 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Initial Entry Military Service (DIEMS)/Date of Initial Entry Uniformed Services (DIEUS) be changed from 17 July 1986 to 5 January 1987. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Mr. E. David Hoard, and Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott considered this application on 11 April 2002. PEGGY E. GORDON Panel Chair Attachments: Ltr, AFPC/DPPRS, dtd 28 Feb 02 Ltr, AFLSA/JAJM, undtd AFBCMR 01-03027 INDEX CODE:...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Mr. E. David Hoard, and Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott considered this application on 11 April 2002. PEGGY E. GORDON Panel Chair Attachments: Ltr, AFPC/DPPRS, dtd 28 Feb 02 Ltr, AFLSA/JAJM, undtd AFBCMR 01-03027 INDEX CODE:...
The Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence on 24 November 1999. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLSA/JAJM recommends the application be denied. At trial, the judge asked the applicant, “So none of this was a result of your wife writing checks you didn’t know about causing you to have a negative balance?” The applicant’s answer was “No, your honor.” The AFLSA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit...
The commander told him he could, but that he would have to receive and undesirable discharge; however, after his discharge he could request the Veterans Administration (VA) upgrade his discharge to general. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice. Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW reviewed this application and recommended denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Jackson Hauslein, Ms. Marilyn Thomas, and Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson considered this application on 16 January 2002. JACKSON HAUSLEIN Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 18 Dec 01 AFBCMR 01-03071 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM FOR...
The PHRB determined the applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to support being awarded the PH. He was requested to provide additional information which would substantiate his receiving the PH. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted, via his Congressman, letters from former military members in support his request...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03101 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to enlist in the Air Force, or in the alternative, her RE code be waived to allow her enlistment in the Air Force. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Jackson Hauslein, Ms. Marilyn Thomas, and Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson considered this application on 16 January 2002. JACKSON HAUSLEIN Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSFM, dtd 2 Jan 02 AFBCMR 01-03138 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM FOR...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03151 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may reenlist in the military. Therefore, the commander felt that it would be in the best interest of the Air Force and the applicant that he separate from the service. On 25...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03153 INDEX CODE: 128.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The weight of his household goods (HHGs) shipment be reduced from 11,935 pounds to 11,060 pounds. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, the majority of the Board agrees with the...
DPPPO states that the applicant wrote a letter to the board explaining the date she would take her SOS test; however did not inform the board of her course completion date. DPPPO states that on 24 January 2002, the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) considered the applicant’s request to correct her duty title from “social worker” to “family advocacy.” The ERAB denied her request because it appeared no corrective action was taken before the results of the P0401A board were released and...
However, her uncharacterized discharge should not be changed as it reflects her separation before completing a period of service (i.e., 180-days of continuous active service) that would allow an honorable characterization. In addition, AFPC/DPPRS recommends changing the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason for separation to “JFF - Secretarial Authority.” AFPC/DPPRS states that the applicant’s discharge was in error and she should have been discharged under AFI 36-3208, paragraph...
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 January 2002, HQ ARPC/DPP reviewed this application and recommended denial. On 23 April 2001, the applicant was sent...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03223 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record, to include the Air Force Commendation Medal, Second Oak Leaf Cluster (AFCM, 2 OLC), be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2001A (CY01A) Central Major Selection Board. As a...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03224 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for the Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (SGLI) premiums automatically deducted from April through September 2001. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant...
Members of the Board, Ms. Patricia J. Zarodkiewicz, Mr. Michael Maglio, and Mrs. Carolyn J. Watkins, considered this application on 2 May 2002. Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Apr 02 AFBCMR 01-03232 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03236 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge and his 25 days of lost time be removed from his records. We therefore agree with the recommendation of the Air Force that the applicant’s discharge should be upgraded to general (under...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 February 2002 for review and response within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 26 Jan 89. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states the applicant has not submitted any evidence nor identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the processing of his discharge. A complete...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03274 INDEX CODE: 107.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: NY State Div of Vet Affairs SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect he received the M16 Marksman Ribbon while in basic training. DPPPR requested that the applicant provide Air Force Form 522, which would show his qualification...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Mr. William Edwards, Mr. George Franklin, considered this application on 30 January 2002. WAYNE R. GRACIE Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPRS, dtd 20 Dec 01 AFBCMR 01-03280 INDEX CODE: 110.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Members of the Board Mr. Jackson Hauslein, Ms. Marilyn Thomas, and Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson considered this application on 16 January 2002. JACKSON HAUSLEIN Panel Chair Attachments: Ltr, AFPC/DPMAF2, dtd 27 Nov 01 Ltr, AFPC/DPPPOC, dtd 19 Dec 01 AFBCMR 01-03286 INDEX CODE: 102.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the...
The applicant states, and we believe, that he based his decision to be commissioned prior to the completion of his master’s degree so he could attain more time in grade. Therefore, the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was appointed an Air Force officer after he completed his degree requirements and that he should receive the proper service credit based on that change. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ VICE CHAIR AFBCMR 01-03301 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03321 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Medal. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D, and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPMAF2 recommends the application be denied. Since she did perform duty as an Assistant Executive Officer, for which she received a Joint Service Commendation Medal for her...
The retiree may file an election change, or the former spouse may request the retiree be deemed to have made such a change on his or her behalf as long as legal documentation is provided that the member agreed or that the court ordered the member to establish former spouse coverage. On 4 Dec 01, it was requested that the member provide a completed DD Form 2656-1, SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse coverage, and an acknowledgement of debt statement. ...
Disqualification for worldwide service and continued active duty occurs if the diastolic pressure is consistently more than 110mm Hg following an adequate period of therapy in an ambulatory status. Standards for enlistment in the USAFR require a 5-day blood pressure reading to be recorded. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material...
On 2 Feb 91, he enlisted in the Washington Air National Guard (ANG); he transferred to the Air Force Reserve on 10 Dec 92. On 19 Feb 95, he was discharged from the Air Force Reserve with a General discharge by reason of Defective Enlistment – Fraudulent Entry. On 5 Jul 94, HQ AFRES/CV approved the findings and recommendations and the case file was forwarded to the Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) for a determination as to whether the applicant should receive Lengthy Service Probation (LSP).
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03389 INDEX NUMBER: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He indicates that he would be willing to make a personal appearance to the Board to discuss his side of the story. As of this date, no response has been received by...
He was separated on 14 Sep 87. Rather, as was noted by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service is used in those cases where the member has not yet completed six months of service at the time separation proceedings were, for whatever reason, initiated. However, after a thorough review of the applicant's submission and the evidence of record, we see no evidence of any extenuating circumstances in this case.
The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that contrary to AFPC/DPPPR, the AFPC website does list Operation DESERT FOX (16 - 22 December 1998). Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B. In view of this lack of information, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application AFBCMR Docket Number 01-03418 in Executive Session on...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the former member’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D, and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the applicant’s request to upgrade her late husband’s discharge be denied. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPTR states, in part, that there is...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03445 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. On 28 Sep 54, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the member’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. After thoroughly...
DPW indicated that, by letter dated 3 January 2002, they requested that the applicant provide additional documentation, i.e., his leave and earnings statements along with a copy of his current SGLI election certificate. In addition, DPW states that Hanscom AFB took adequate steps as directed to inform all members of the increase in coverage and that the applicant had adequate time during the month of April 2001 to make a new election and avoid the increased premium. The DPW evaluation is...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03464 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that there is no evidence to support that the applicant was...
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). The applicant contends that he was never notified that if he did not elect RCSBP coverage within the required timeframe that his coverage would be automatically enrolled under Option A. The applicant was notified on two occasions of his eligibility to enroll in RCSBP but did not elect coverage either time.
As of this date, this office has received no response. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that his separation code should remain the same since he did in fact, voluntarily request discharge for the good of the service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
On 24 October 1961, the applicant was discharged with an under other than honorable conditions discharge under the provisions of Air Force Regulation 39-21 (fraudulent enlistment). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...
In April 1999, he discovered that he was enrolled and charged for SGLI coverage, even though he had other insurance coverage with another company, and declined SGLI coverage in January 1999. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application AFBCMR Docket Number 01-03488 in Executive Session on 24 July 2002, under the provisions of AFI...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03495 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal and Wound Chevron for his July 1944 service-connected wound and concussion in Normandy, France. After a thorough review of his submission and the supporting documentation he provided, to include a...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03497 INDEX CODE: 131.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) for the periods 22 Sep 89 through 21 Sep 90 and 22 Sep 90 through 21 Apr 91 be voided; and he be considered for promotion to lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB). The...
Additionally, DPPP states that the applicant’s request for correction was for Section X, Senior Rater, to include the rank and branch of service of the senior rater and in Section IV, line 9 from, “first tour USAF Chaplain” to “second active duty tour.” DPPP recommends denial for an SSB based on the OPR not being available for the CY01A CSB. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...