_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response, the applicant indicated that he understands that ACP was not designed for members serving in different pay status formats. The available evidence indicates that the applicant terminated his ACP agreement when he left AGR status and became a Traditional Guardsman prior to completing his ACP service commitment. ...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant stated that the applicant had three issues at the time of her discharge: her unsatisfactory...
A complete copy of the Air Staff evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states the incident on the FBI report is correct, but he has since that time earned his Master's and Journeyman's license in plumbing. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00051 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM), the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and that they be placed on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00054 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. Further, we may base our decision on matters of equity and clemency rather than simply on whether rules and regulations which existed at the time were followed. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00055 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may reenlist in the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00056 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to reenter the Air Force. In view of the foregoing, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected by deleting the words “and conduct” from his...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit D. Pursuant to the Board's request for information, the FBI indicated that, on the basis of the evidence provided, they were unable to locate an arrest record pertaining to the applicant (Exhibit C). The applicant met...
Current Air Force promotion policy dictates that before a decoration is credited for a specific promotion cycle, the close out date of the decoration must be on or before the Promotion Eligibility Cutoff date (PECD), and the date of the DÉCOR-6, Recommendation for Decoration Printout (RDP), must be before the date of selection for the cycle in question. DPPPWB states that the special order awarding the applicant’s AFAM does not meet the criteria for promotion credit during the 00E7 because...
SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel...
AFBCMR 02-00060 INDEX NUMBER: 128.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
However, he has just discovered that his 1999 survivor benefit election was listed as “having not been received.” In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement, copies of medical records and additional documents associated with the issues cited in his contentions. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit...
They indicated that in accordance with Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 12731, a member must complete at least 20 years of satisfactory service, with the last 8 years of qualifying service in a Reserve component. From 1 July 1949 until 6 August 1966, the day he was transferred to the Honorary Retired Reserve, he had completed 8 years of satisfactory service toward retirement A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00073 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that based on the...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he remarried on 12 Mar 99, he advised ARPC of his change in marital status and was never counseled by ARPC that he had a year to cancel his SBP benefit coverage on his new spouse. Member stated he contacted ARPC after his remarriage and was not counseled that he had one year to cancel his RCSBP benefit. The ARPC/DPS evaluation is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-00079 INDEX CODE 102.08 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with active duty service towards retirement for time spent in the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC). A complete copy of applicant’s response, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00080 INDEX NUMBER: 128.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The debt of $21, 527.78 he incurred for recoupment of Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP) be voided, deleted from his records, and all amounts previously paid toward this debt be refunded to him. We took notice of...
AFBCMR 02-00081 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
In his 13 years of service, he never received an Article 15 or any such reprimands. The application was timely filed. Exhibit C. AFDRB Hearing Record, dated 3 Apr 01, w/atch.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00084 (CASE 3) INDEX CODES: 111.02, 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 7 Jan 92 through 6 Jan 93 be declared void and removed from her records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
He indicates that he was denied access to documents or evidence in his case. He requested, but was denied the right to cross-examine his former supervisor and his wife. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00086 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a direct promotion to the grade of major. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on a previous application favorably considered by the Board, on 27 July 2000, the...
## Top Report at the time he was considered and nonselected for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by the CY01B (5 Nov 01) Lieutenant Colonel Board. He was selected for promotion to the grade of major and came back on active duty with a date of rank of 1 Nov 93. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.
INDEX CODE: 131.09 AFBCMR 02-00088 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
Members of the Board, Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Mr. Billy C. Baxter, and Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, considered this application on 25 July 2002. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Ltr, ARPC/DPB, dtd 24 Jul 02, w/atch AFBCMR 02-00090 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board...
Members of the Board Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott and Mr. Christopher Carey considered this application on 5 September 2002. ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Record of Board Proceedings, dated 25 Jul 02 AFBCMR 02-00090 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force...
AFBCMR 02-00091 INDEX CODE: 128.14 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He provided information to his supervisor for inclusion in the report but he omitted the information because he assumed it had been included in a previous report. The DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 8 Feb 02 for review...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00095 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code of 2x “first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to a code that will permit him to reenter...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits...
HQ AFPC/DPSAMP completed the AF Form 281 to change his name on the Air Force file for any contact purpose. The DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, is only used to correct an error on the DD Form 214 if it was in error at the time of discharge. He provided several documents to substantiate his claim of the correct spelling of his name.
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). On 28 January 2001, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request to upgrade his discharge to honorable. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 March 2002.
He stated that the DFC was awarded for completion of 35 combat flight missions. Therefore, the basis for the applicant’s claim that all other crew members of the 2 Oct 44 combat flight mission received the DFC is unsubstantiated. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant provided additional documentary evidence for the Board’s consideration through his...
On 4 Feb 76, the Board considered and denied a request from the applicant to amend his DD Form 214 to include the discharge authority. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force found at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Board was provided a copy of a letter written to...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the Luke AFB leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of the increase in coverage and the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00107 INDEX CODE 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) election for “NO” coverage, dated 10 February 1999, be honored and he be reimbursed for the monthly premiums deducted from his pay for SGLI coverage of $250,000 since 1 April 2001. The...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The former member had completed but did not submit a retirement benefits application. DPP states that to apply for Reserve retired pay, a member must complete an ARPC Form 0-69, Application for Retired Pay, and submit the form to the ARPC for processing. The DPP evaluation is at Exhibit B.
DPB states when he was appointed, he did not claim full-time employment during the time period in question. A review of his original commissioning application reflects constructive service credit was accurately awarded at the time of his appointment based on the information he provided. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Jul 03, for...
Members of the Board Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Mr. John E. B. Smith, and Mr. William Edwards, considered this application on 4 April 2002. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 5 Mar 02 AFBCMR 02-00114 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AFBCMR 02-00115 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00120 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 5 March 1998 through 4 March 1999, be removed from his records and he be provided supplemental promotion consideration for cycle 99E5. The applicant provided comments to the referral report on...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR states the applicant was requested on 22 Feb 02 to provide documentation showing he was recommended for the DFC for the 28 Feb 91 mission. An individual can not recommend themselves for a decoration or for an upgrade of a decoration previously awarded. The applicant has not provided any documentation to show that the original recommending official submitted a recommendation for DFC or his...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00129 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantiive requirements of...
Accordingly, they recommend his records remain the same and his request be denied. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge should be upgraded to honorable. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00131 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. Exhibit B.
AFBCMR 02-00136 INDEX NUMBER: 137.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
INDEX CODE: 128.02 AFBCMR 02-00137 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
INDEX CODE 128.02 AFBCMR 02-00139 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AFBCMR 02-00144 INDEX CODE: 128.14 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...