RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01246
INDEX CODE: 135.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded a good year for the Retention/Retirement (R/R) year April
1997 - April 1998 so he may receive a 15-year retirement.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served his units of Richards-Gebaur AFB MO and McGuire AFB, NJ well. On
22 November 1996, when he was to leave to perform his regularly scheduled
unit training assembly (UTA), (23 - 24 November 1996) he started having
symptoms at work and late on 23 November 1996 had a heart attack. After
his six-week checkup with his doctor, he advised his First Sergeant that he
had been cleared to return with limited duty; however, his First Sergeant
told him to wait and see what the Air Force decided. It took the Air Force
from January 1997 to July 1998 to discharge him. He served as an
administrative specialist while on active duty and this type of position
would have been within the doctor’s limitations. His unit, 88th Aerial
Port Squadron, had options they could have used but did not. He could have
earned 1 or possibly 2 years for retirement during the time it took the Air
Force to discharge him.
In support of his application, he provides a personal statement, a
statement of support, medical documents from his private physician and
documents associated with his Reserve participation and point credit
history. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 30 June 1967 and was
progressively promoted to the grade of sergeant (E-4). He performed duties
in Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) R70250, Administrative Specialist. He
served in this capacity until 21 August 1971, when he was honorably
released from active duty, having served 4 years, 1 month and 22 days in
the Regular Air Force. On 22 August 1971, he was transferred to the Air
Force Reserve in the grade of sergeant (E-4) and served in AFSC 60555,
Cargo Processor. During his period of Reserve service, he was
progressively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). Records
indicate he was discharged from the Air Force Reserve effective 30 July
1998 by reason of physical disqualification. As of that date, he was
credited with 14 years, 1 month and 22 days of satisfactory Federal
service.
The applicant’s Reserve participation history indicates that for R/R year
24 April 1997 to 23 April 1998 (contested period), he earned 0 Active Duty
points 0 Inactive Duty points, 0 Extension Course Institute (ECI) points
and 15 membership points for 15 total and retirement points and an
unsatisfactory year of Federal service. For the Retirement Years Ending
(RYEs) 23 April 1994 and 23 April 1995 he was credited with 47 and 49 total
points, respectively. Therefore, the RYEs 23 April 1994 and 23 April 1995
were unsatisfactory years of Federal service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPP recommends the application be denied. DPP states that in order to
establish eligibility for Reserve retired pay, a member must complete at
least 15, but less than 20 years of satisfactory service, with the last 6
years of qualifying service in a Reserve component. In addition, DPP
states that the member must be involuntarily separated (to include medical
disqualification) from the Selected Reserve. After a review of the
applicant’s record, DPP states that his record shows he was put on a
medical profile “4” on 3 June 1997, until the Air Force Reserve Surgeon
could make a final determination on his medical qualification for continued
military duty. His unit of assignment did review his case to see if he
could be utilized in a different position and found it was not an option in
his case. Additionally, special assignment limitations were not
appropriate because the applicant’s medical condition was not compatible
with continued military service to include his home duty station.
The ARPC/DPP evaluation, with attachments is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 May
2002 for review and response. As of this date, this office has received no
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We believe that the applicant’s request
for a correction of his record in such a manner as to establish his
entitlement to a 15-year retirement is not supported by the evidence of
record. The applicant claims he was unfairly precluded from performing
limited duties during the period taken to process his medical
disqualification. But, based on his medical disqualification he was
disqualified for full duty and, apparently, his unit was unable to utilize
his services in a limited duty status. In matters such as this, the needs
of the service are of primary consideration. Although it may seem an
inordinate period of time elapsed for the case to be processed, based on
the final disposition in his case, this did not result in an injustice to
the applicant. While we are not unsympathetic to the applicant’s
circumstances, in the absence of evidence indicating he was treated
differently from other similarly situated members or that the computation
of his service on his Point Credit History is erroneous, we agree with the
opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and conclude that the applicant has not sustained his burden
of establishing that he has suffered either an error or injustice.
Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 5 September 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr, Panel Chair
Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, Member
Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for ABCMR Docket Number
02-01246:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 April 2002, with
attachments.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 21 May 2002, with
attachments.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 May 2002.
ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03132
His record does not show unsatisfactory service (less than 50 points earned) until Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 18 January 2000. A correction was made, and his record now shows 91 AD points, 20 IDT points, 0 ECI points, 15 membership points, 126 total retirement points, and a year of satisfactory service for RYE 18 January 2002. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00658
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00658 INDEX CODE: 135.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 August 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect satisfactory service for retirement year ending (RYE) 11 November 1999 by transferring four Inactive Duty for Training (IDT) points he...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01788 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her retirement year ending (RYE) 27 July 2001, be changed from an unsatisfactory year to a satisfactory year. She reported for active duty on 4 July 2001, served her annual tour, stayed to fulfill the year’s IDT’s, and returned to...
She did not perform any IDT points during the R/R year 24 January 2001 through 23 January 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00792
INDEX CODE 135.02 AFBCMR BC-2003-00792 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
INDEX CODE: 135.02 AFBCMR 02-02106 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
Based on the audit, the applicant's R/R was changed from 2 October to 14 June. The applicant was notified on 17 April 1999 about the change in his R/R date and that his points were being realigned to coincide with the 14 June R/R date. DPP further states the applicant was notified of the change in his R/R year date in April 1999 and he received an AF Form 526 for RYE 13 June 1999, and furthermore, the applicant had adequate time to earn points for the RYE 13 June 2000.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03555
MARILYN THOMAS Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, ARPC/DPP, dtd 23 Oct 03, w/Atch MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01574
His records were then corrected to reflect he was appointed in the AFRES on 9 November 1996 with an assignment in the Non-Obligated, Non-Participating Ready Reserve Personnel Section (NNRPS). The DPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to DPP’s statement that he had not actively applied for AFRES positions following his discharge from extended active, he submits copies of e-mail...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00869
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She and another unit member contacted HQ Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) in July 2006 and inquired as to whether or not her duty status needed to be altered on orders. DPP notes her statement that she was unable to perform IDT training on 13 August 2005 because the entire building was closed on that Saturday and training was not available. ...