Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201246
Original file (0201246.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-01246
            INDEX CODE:  135.02
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded a good year for  the  Retention/Retirement  (R/R)  year  April
1997 - April 1998 so he may receive a 15-year retirement.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served his units of Richards-Gebaur AFB MO and McGuire AFB, NJ well.   On
22 November 1996, when he was to leave to perform  his  regularly  scheduled
unit training assembly (UTA), (23 - 24  November  1996)  he  started  having
symptoms at work and late on 23 November 1996 had  a  heart  attack.   After
his six-week checkup with his doctor, he advised his First Sergeant that  he
had been cleared to return with limited duty; however,  his  First  Sergeant
told him to wait and see what the Air Force decided.  It took the Air  Force
from January  1997  to  July  1998  to  discharge  him.   He  served  as  an
administrative specialist while on active duty and  this  type  of  position
would have been within the doctor’s  limitations.   His  unit,  88th  Aerial
Port Squadron, had options they could have used but did not.  He could  have
earned 1 or possibly 2 years for retirement during the time it took the  Air
Force to discharge him.

In  support  of  his  application,  he  provides  a  personal  statement,  a
statement of support, medical  documents  from  his  private  physician  and
documents  associated  with  his  Reserve  participation  and  point  credit
history.  His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on  30  June  1967  and  was
progressively promoted to the grade of sergeant (E-4). He  performed  duties
in Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) R70250,  Administrative  Specialist.   He
served in  this  capacity  until  21 August  1971,  when  he  was  honorably
released from active duty, having served 4 years, 1 month  and  22  days  in
the Regular Air Force.  On 22 August 1971, he was  transferred  to  the  Air
Force Reserve in the grade of sergeant  (E-4)  and  served  in  AFSC  60555,
Cargo  Processor.   During  his  period   of   Reserve   service,   he   was
progressively promoted to  the  grade  of  staff  sergeant  (E-5).   Records
indicate he was discharged from the Air  Force  Reserve  effective  30  July
1998 by reason of physical  disqualification.   As  of  that  date,  he  was
credited with 14  years,  1  month  and  22  days  of  satisfactory  Federal
service.

The applicant’s Reserve participation history indicates that  for  R/R  year
24 April 1997 to 23 April 1998 (contested period), he earned 0  Active  Duty
points 0 Inactive Duty points, 0 Extension  Course  Institute  (ECI)  points
and 15  membership  points  for  15  total  and  retirement  points  and  an
unsatisfactory year of Federal service.  For  the  Retirement  Years  Ending
(RYEs) 23 April 1994 and 23 April 1995 he was credited with 47 and 49  total
points, respectively.  Therefore, the RYEs 23 April 1994 and 23  April  1995
were unsatisfactory years of Federal service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPP recommends the application be denied.  DPP states that in order  to
establish eligibility for Reserve retired pay, a  member  must  complete  at
least 15, but less than 20 years of satisfactory service, with  the  last  6
years of qualifying service  in  a  Reserve  component.   In  addition,  DPP
states that the member must be involuntarily separated (to  include  medical
disqualification)  from  the  Selected  Reserve.   After  a  review  of  the
applicant’s record, DPP states that  his  record  shows  he  was  put  on  a
medical profile “4” on 3 June 1997, until  the  Air  Force  Reserve  Surgeon
could make a final determination on his medical qualification for  continued
military duty.  His unit of assignment did review his  case  to  see  if  he
could be utilized in a different position and found it was not an option  in
his  case.   Additionally,   special   assignment   limitations   were   not
appropriate because the applicant’s medical  condition  was  not  compatible
with continued military service to include his home duty station.

The ARPC/DPP evaluation, with attachments is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31  May
2002 for review and response.  As of this date, this office has received  no
response.

_________________________________________________________________



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  We believe that  the  applicant’s  request
for a correction of his  record  in  such  a  manner  as  to  establish  his
entitlement to a 15-year retirement is not  supported  by  the  evidence  of
record.  The applicant claims he  was  unfairly  precluded  from  performing
limited  duties  during  the   period   taken   to   process   his   medical
disqualification.   But,  based  on  his  medical  disqualification  he  was
disqualified for full duty and, apparently, his unit was unable  to  utilize
his services in a limited duty status.  In matters such as this,  the  needs
of the service are of  primary  consideration.   Although  it  may  seem  an
inordinate period of time elapsed for the case to  be  processed,  based  on
the final disposition in his case, this did not result in  an  injustice  to
the  applicant.   While  we  are  not  unsympathetic  to   the   applicant’s
circumstances,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  indicating  he  was  treated
differently from other similarly situated members or  that  the  computation
of his service on his Point Credit History is erroneous, we agree  with  the
opinion  and  recommendation  of   the   Air   Force   office   of   primary
responsibility and conclude that the applicant has not sustained his  burden
of  establishing  that  he  has  suffered  either  an  error  or  injustice.
Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the  application
was denied and that the application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not  considered  with  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 5 September 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr, Panel Chair
      Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, Member
      Mr. Christopher Carey, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered for ABCMR  Docket  Number
02-01246:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 April 2002, with
                attachments.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 21 May 2002, with
                        attachments.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 May 2002.




                                   ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03132

    Original file (BC-2007-03132.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record does not show unsatisfactory service (less than 50 points earned) until Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 18 January 2000. A correction was made, and his record now shows 91 AD points, 20 IDT points, 0 ECI points, 15 membership points, 126 total retirement points, and a year of satisfactory service for RYE 18 January 2002. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00658

    Original file (BC-2007-00658.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00658 INDEX CODE: 135.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 August 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect satisfactory service for retirement year ending (RYE) 11 November 1999 by transferring four Inactive Duty for Training (IDT) points he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201788

    Original file (0201788.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01788 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her retirement year ending (RYE) 27 July 2001, be changed from an unsatisfactory year to a satisfactory year. She reported for active duty on 4 July 2001, served her annual tour, stayed to fulfill the year’s IDT’s, and returned to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0202881

    Original file (0202881.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She did not perform any IDT points during the R/R year 24 January 2001 through 23 January 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00792

    Original file (BC-2003-00792.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE 135.02 AFBCMR BC-2003-00792 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202106

    Original file (0202106.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 135.02 AFBCMR 02-02106 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202016

    Original file (0202016.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the audit, the applicant's R/R was changed from 2 October to 14 June. The applicant was notified on 17 April 1999 about the change in his R/R date and that his points were being realigned to coincide with the 14 June R/R date. DPP further states the applicant was notified of the change in his R/R year date in April 1999 and he received an AF Form 526 for RYE 13 June 1999, and furthermore, the applicant had adequate time to earn points for the RYE 13 June 2000.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03555

    Original file (BC-2003-03555.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    MARILYN THOMAS Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, ARPC/DPP, dtd 23 Oct 03, w/Atch MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01574

    Original file (BC-2005-01574.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records were then corrected to reflect he was appointed in the AFRES on 9 November 1996 with an assignment in the Non-Obligated, Non-Participating Ready Reserve Personnel Section (NNRPS). The DPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to DPP’s statement that he had not actively applied for AFRES positions following his discharge from extended active, he submits copies of e-mail...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00869

    Original file (BC-2007-00869.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She and another unit member contacted HQ Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) in July 2006 and inquired as to whether or not her duty status needed to be altered on orders. DPP notes her statement that she was unable to perform IDT training on 13 August 2005 because the entire building was closed on that Saturday and training was not available. ...