Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201220
Original file (0201220.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  02-01220
                                        INDEX CODE 137.02
                                        COUNSEL:  None

                                        HEARING DESIRED: No


____________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show he filed a timely election for  termination
of spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)  before  the  first
anniversary of his remarriage and be relieved from the SBP premium debt.

____________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

SBP coverage is insurance that he did not want and has not wanted  it  since
the divorce from his first wife in 1977.  Please note that he  has  attached
a copy of his SBP termination request, dated March 2002.  He was  not  aware
of a legal obligation to continue  SBP  insurance  following  remarriage  in
1986.  He was never advised of the requirement and he believes  that  it  is
unreasonable to think that he should have been aware of it.   The  U.S.  Air
Force was notified of his remarriage  shortly  after  it  occurred  when  he
applied and received an Air Force identification  card  for  his  wife,  and
upon DEERS registration.  Apparently, there was no exchange  of  information
between the personnel people and the finance people on this until  2001  and
2002.

He had not received any financial benefit from SBP insurance  and  the  U.S.
Government has not incurred any financial loss in this case.   Consequently,
no harm has been done.

The accumulated back charges create a  serious  personal  financial  problem
which, at his current age of 72,  he  finds  to  be  impossible  to  resolve
without a severe decline in his standard of living.

To summarize, he believes this debt places an unwarranted  financial  burden
upon him, which is unjust.  He respectfully requests to be relieved  of  it.


In support of his application, he submits retiree account statements  and  a
DD Form 2656-2, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

____________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The member retired 1 Sep 72 and elected spouse only SBP coverage based on  a
reduced level of retired pay during  the  initial  enrollment  period.   The
applicant and that spouse divorced in  1977,  the  finance  center  received
notification of the divorce in May 83, and SBP coverage  and  premiums  were
suspended.  Defense Enrollment Eligibility Report System  (DEERS)  indicates
the member and M_ married on 2 Aug 86.  However, he failed  to  decline  SBP
coverage for his new spouse before the first anniversary of their  marriage,
and she became the eligible spouse beneficiary on 2 Aug 87.  In Jan 02,  the
DFAS  -  Cleveland  Center  (DFAS-CL)  learned  of  the  member's  marriage,
reinstated spouse coverage and premiums, and began to recover  approximately
$11,281 in costs retroactive to the first anniversary.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted  from
the applicant's military records, are contained in the letters  prepared  by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B.

____________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPTR reviewed the application and states that there is no evidence  of
an Air Force error or injustice in this  case;  therefore,  DPPTR  recommend
relief be denied.  However, if  the  Board's  decision  is  to  approve  the
request, the  approval  should  be  contingent  upon  obtaining  the  wife's
properly notarized  statement  concurring  in  the  revocation  of  the  SBP
reduced coverage currently in effect on her behalf.

AFPC/DPPTR evaluation is at Exhibit B.

____________________________________________________________



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated that he  sense  a
feeling that there are some people who believe they have uncovered a  source
of income for the government by identifying retirees such as his  self  that
they believe have intentionally evaded something that he consider to  be  an
obscure technicality in the rules of the  SBP  program.   Such  thinking  is
very wrong!  This matter concerns  participation  in  an  insurance  program
that  he  believed  had  been  terminated  25  years  ago.   Can  the  Board
appreciate his feelings at encountering this subject unexpectedly  again  in
the year 2002, at his current age of 73.

He asks for the Board's compassion in this matter, and he request  that  the
Board approves his application for relief.  He submits a statement from  his
wife indicating that she concurs with revocation of SBP coverage.

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit C.

____________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice.  After reviewing the  evidence
of record,  the  majority  of  the  Board  believes  that  the  relief
requested should be approved.  In this regard,  the  majority  of  the
Board is of the opinion that the applicant truly  believed  that  when
the SBP premiums were suspended upon his divorce in 1977, the SBP  was
in fact terminated.  The majority of the Board  also  notes  that  his
current spouse supports the termination of SBP  coverage.   Therefore,
the majority of  the  Board  recommends  the  applicant's  records  be
corrected to the extent indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 1 August  1987,  he
elected not to extend spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan
_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  02-01220
in Executive Session on 16 August 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:

                  Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Chair
                  Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
                  Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member

By a majority  vote,  the  Board  voted  to  correct  the  records  as
recommended.  Mr. Roj voted to deny the applicant's request, but  does
not wish to submit  a  minority  report.   The  following  documentary
evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Apr 02, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPTR, dated 29 Apr 02.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 May 02.
   Exhibit D.  Applicant's response, dated 27 May 02, w/atch.




                                   BARBARA A. WESTGATE
                                   Chair




AFBCMR 02-01220




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of  the  Department  of  the  Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show  that  on  1  August
1987, he elected not to extend  spouse  coverage  under  the  Survivor
Benefit Plan.






JOE G. LINEBERGER

Director

Air Force Review Boards Agency


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00953

    Original file (BC-2004-00953.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPTR states that SBP spouse coverage is suspended when the spouse loses eligibility. He submitted this request for corrective action in a timely manner after being notified that coverage had been established on behalf of his current spouse. Novel, Member By majority vote, the Board recommended granting the requested relief.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101323

    Original file (0101323.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant's wife submitted a letter stating if they had been counseled adequately they would have not chosen to resume SBP coverage. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 25 September 2001 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003202

    Original file (0003202.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member and his current spouse married on 17 February 1996, but he failed to advise the finance center that he did not want to extend SBP coverage to his new wife before the first anniversary of their marriage (17 February 1997). A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 March...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02424

    Original file (BC-2002-02424.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He incorrectly completed the DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and should have completed it to reflect former spouse coverage. On 1 Aug 02, they requested that the applicant provide a completed DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and his former spouse’s marriage certificate. The complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02424

    Original file (BC-2002-02424.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He incorrectly completed the DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and should have completed it to reflect former spouse coverage. On 1 Aug 02, they requested that the applicant provide a completed DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and his former spouse’s marriage certificate. The complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02252

    Original file (BC-2003-02252.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Further, since there was no court approved modification to the divorce decree regarding the SBP coverage, as required by statute, a majority of the Board is not persuaded the Air Force erred in refusing to change his SBP beneficiary after he advised DFAS that his former spouse had consented to the termination of her coverage based on the terms of their property settlement. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: The majority of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03448

    Original file (BC-2002-03448.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues of the Afterburner are mailed to the correspondence address each retiree provides to the finance center. It is each member’s responsibility to notify DFAS-CL of their current correspondence address, regardless of their pay status. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-03448 in Executive Session on 21 January 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. David C. VanGasbeck,Panel Chair Ms....

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703182

    Original file (9703182.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    If neither the member nor the former spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. The member 97031 82 remarried 21 Jul90. Recommendation: Although there is no evidence of Air Force error, to preclude a possible injustice, we recommend partial relief: the member's record should be corrected to reflect that on 28 Jun 88 he elected to change SBP spouse and child -vera e to former spouse and child coverage...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00206

    Original file (BC 2014 00206.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law (PL) 99-145 allows a participant, with suspended spouse coverage, to elect not to resume coverage for a subsequently acquired spouse. While the applicant acted in a timely manner when he notified DFAS-CL of his divorce from his first wife, it is reasonable to expect him to have also informed the finance center of any newly-acquired spouse. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00493

    Original file (BC-2004-00493.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the correct information had been provided to his former spouse, her SBP selection would have been “none.” In support of his request, applicant provided a letter from his former spouse’s attorney with a chronology of events surrounding the election of former spouse coverage; copies of his separation agreement and divorce decree; a copy of “A Guide to: Military Marriage Dissolution, Separation, Pension Division and DFAS DRO’s”; DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement...