RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01220
INDEX CODE 137.02
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
____________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show he filed a timely election for termination
of spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) before the first
anniversary of his remarriage and be relieved from the SBP premium debt.
____________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
SBP coverage is insurance that he did not want and has not wanted it since
the divorce from his first wife in 1977. Please note that he has attached
a copy of his SBP termination request, dated March 2002. He was not aware
of a legal obligation to continue SBP insurance following remarriage in
1986. He was never advised of the requirement and he believes that it is
unreasonable to think that he should have been aware of it. The U.S. Air
Force was notified of his remarriage shortly after it occurred when he
applied and received an Air Force identification card for his wife, and
upon DEERS registration. Apparently, there was no exchange of information
between the personnel people and the finance people on this until 2001 and
2002.
He had not received any financial benefit from SBP insurance and the U.S.
Government has not incurred any financial loss in this case. Consequently,
no harm has been done.
The accumulated back charges create a serious personal financial problem
which, at his current age of 72, he finds to be impossible to resolve
without a severe decline in his standard of living.
To summarize, he believes this debt places an unwarranted financial burden
upon him, which is unjust. He respectfully requests to be relieved of it.
In support of his application, he submits retiree account statements and a
DD Form 2656-2, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
____________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The member retired 1 Sep 72 and elected spouse only SBP coverage based on a
reduced level of retired pay during the initial enrollment period. The
applicant and that spouse divorced in 1977, the finance center received
notification of the divorce in May 83, and SBP coverage and premiums were
suspended. Defense Enrollment Eligibility Report System (DEERS) indicates
the member and M_ married on 2 Aug 86. However, he failed to decline SBP
coverage for his new spouse before the first anniversary of their marriage,
and she became the eligible spouse beneficiary on 2 Aug 87. In Jan 02, the
DFAS - Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL) learned of the member's marriage,
reinstated spouse coverage and premiums, and began to recover approximately
$11,281 in costs retroactive to the first anniversary.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B.
____________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPTR reviewed the application and states that there is no evidence of
an Air Force error or injustice in this case; therefore, DPPTR recommend
relief be denied. However, if the Board's decision is to approve the
request, the approval should be contingent upon obtaining the wife's
properly notarized statement concurring in the revocation of the SBP
reduced coverage currently in effect on her behalf.
AFPC/DPPTR evaluation is at Exhibit B.
____________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated that he sense a
feeling that there are some people who believe they have uncovered a source
of income for the government by identifying retirees such as his self that
they believe have intentionally evaded something that he consider to be an
obscure technicality in the rules of the SBP program. Such thinking is
very wrong! This matter concerns participation in an insurance program
that he believed had been terminated 25 years ago. Can the Board
appreciate his feelings at encountering this subject unexpectedly again in
the year 2002, at his current age of 73.
He asks for the Board's compassion in this matter, and he request that the
Board approves his application for relief. He submits a statement from his
wife indicating that she concurs with revocation of SBP coverage.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit C.
____________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. After reviewing the evidence
of record, the majority of the Board believes that the relief
requested should be approved. In this regard, the majority of the
Board is of the opinion that the applicant truly believed that when
the SBP premiums were suspended upon his divorce in 1977, the SBP was
in fact terminated. The majority of the Board also notes that his
current spouse supports the termination of SBP coverage. Therefore,
the majority of the Board recommends the applicant's records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 1 August 1987, he
elected not to extend spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-01220
in Executive Session on 16 August 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Chair
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
By a majority vote, the Board voted to correct the records as
recommended. Mr. Roj voted to deny the applicant's request, but does
not wish to submit a minority report. The following documentary
evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Apr 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPTR, dated 29 Apr 02.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 May 02.
Exhibit D. Applicant's response, dated 27 May 02, w/atch.
BARBARA A. WESTGATE
Chair
AFBCMR 02-01220
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 1 August
1987, he elected not to extend spouse coverage under the Survivor
Benefit Plan.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00953
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPTR states that SBP spouse coverage is suspended when the spouse loses eligibility. He submitted this request for corrective action in a timely manner after being notified that coverage had been established on behalf of his current spouse. Novel, Member By majority vote, the Board recommended granting the requested relief.
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant's wife submitted a letter stating if they had been counseled adequately they would have not chosen to resume SBP coverage. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 25 September 2001 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel...
The member and his current spouse married on 17 February 1996, but he failed to advise the finance center that he did not want to extend SBP coverage to his new wife before the first anniversary of their marriage (17 February 1997). A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 March...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02424
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He incorrectly completed the DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and should have completed it to reflect former spouse coverage. On 1 Aug 02, they requested that the applicant provide a completed DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and his former spouse’s marriage certificate. The complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02424
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He incorrectly completed the DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and should have completed it to reflect former spouse coverage. On 1 Aug 02, they requested that the applicant provide a completed DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, and his former spouse’s marriage certificate. The complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02252
Further, since there was no court approved modification to the divorce decree regarding the SBP coverage, as required by statute, a majority of the Board is not persuaded the Air Force erred in refusing to change his SBP beneficiary after he advised DFAS that his former spouse had consented to the termination of her coverage based on the terms of their property settlement. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: The majority of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03448
Issues of the Afterburner are mailed to the correspondence address each retiree provides to the finance center. It is each member’s responsibility to notify DFAS-CL of their current correspondence address, regardless of their pay status. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-03448 in Executive Session on 21 January 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. David C. VanGasbeck,Panel Chair Ms....
If neither the member nor the former spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. The member 97031 82 remarried 21 Jul90. Recommendation: Although there is no evidence of Air Force error, to preclude a possible injustice, we recommend partial relief: the member's record should be corrected to reflect that on 28 Jun 88 he elected to change SBP spouse and child -vera e to former spouse and child coverage...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00206
Public Law (PL) 99-145 allows a participant, with suspended spouse coverage, to elect not to resume coverage for a subsequently acquired spouse. While the applicant acted in a timely manner when he notified DFAS-CL of his divorce from his first wife, it is reasonable to expect him to have also informed the finance center of any newly-acquired spouse. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00493
If the correct information had been provided to his former spouse, her SBP selection would have been “none.” In support of his request, applicant provided a letter from his former spouse’s attorney with a chronology of events surrounding the election of former spouse coverage; copies of his separation agreement and divorce decree; a copy of “A Guide to: Military Marriage Dissolution, Separation, Pension Division and DFAS DRO’s”; DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement...