Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201259
Original file (0201259.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-01259
            INDEX CODE 137.02
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to establish Survivor Benefit Plan  (SBP)  coverage  for
his wife.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He recently discovered  that  on  his  Retiree  Account  Statement  of
January 10, 2002,  it  did  not  reflect  that  he  selected  the  SBP
coverage.  This was an error.  Upon his  retirement  and  briefing  on
April 17, 1986, AF Form 10 was signed requesting SBP coverage for  his
spouse.  He had spoken with Defense  Finance  and  Accounting  Service
(DFAS) Cleveland Center within two or three days of  finding  it  out.
DFAS informed him that he would have to locate a copy of his SBP  form
signed at the time of his retirement.  He did not have a copy  of  the
AF Form 10, in his personnel  records.   Therefore,  after  contacting
DFAS office, he was instructed to submit a request for a search of his
personnel records at the  National  Personnel  Records  Center  in  St
Louis, MO.

In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal letter,  a
copy of his retiree account statement, and  a  request  pertaining  to
military records, a letter from National Personnel Records Center  and
a copy of his certification of SBP Briefing.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant was notified of his eligibility to  participate  in  the
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) on 3 March 1986 and on 17 April 1986.   He
signed AF Form 10 indicating that he had been briefed on the  Survivor
Benefit Plan.

Applicant was married on 3 September 1966 and retired on 1 July 1986.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPTR recommended denial.  The member's claim that he  signed  an
"AF Form 10" requesting SBP coverage for his wife prior to  retirement
is without merit, since the form used to make an SBP election at  that
time was the AF Form 694,  Data  for  Payment  of  Retired  Air  Force
Personnel.  The member and E--  were  married  on  3  September  1966;
however, finance records indicate that he declined SBP coverage  prior
to his 1 July 1986 retirement.  The  Defense  and  Accounting  Service
(DFAS) records contain an annotation indicating that the member's wife
concurred in his election.

The AFPC/DPPTR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:


The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated that he was
not aware of any discrepancies in his election of  the  SBP  upon  his
retirement or thereafter.  For 16 years, he was under  the  impression
that he had been enrolled in the SBP program and it was not until  his
wife noticed the, No SBP Election reflected on his  January  10,  2002
Retiree Account Statement, that made  him  aware  that  something  was
wrong with his records.  His wife has always handled  their  financial
matters from the beginning of their marriage.  She would look at these
statements only to see what his net pay was and the  taxes  that  were
being withheld from his pay.  He was under the impression that all was
correct and in place for his SBP account.  He would still have been in
the mindset, that he was properly enrolled in the SBP program, if  she
had not brought it to his attention when  she  did.   In  closing,  he
assures the Board that he would never have knowingly refused  to  sign
up for the SBP program.  He would gladly pay back all monies  owed  to
the government based upon DFAS calculations of what he was required to
pay over the past 16 years.  The applicant’s complete response  is  at
Exhibit E.


_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice.  After a  thorough  review  of
the  evidence  of  record  and  applicant's  submission,  we  are  not
persuaded that he should be allowed to establish SBP coverage for  his
spouse.  Applicant's contentions are duly noted to  include  the  fact
that he signed  AF  Form  10  indicating  that  he  received  the  SPB
briefing. However,  we  do  not  find  these  assertions,  in  and  by
themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided
by the Air Force.  Furthermore, no evidence was presented  that  would
lead us to believe that the SBP form on file at the Defense Accounting
and Finance Service indicating that  he  declined  SBP  coverage  with
spouse concurrence is in error.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence
to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of an material error or an  injustice;  that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  02-01259
in Executive Session on 16 August 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:

                 Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Chair
                 Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
                 Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Apr 02, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPTR, dated 29 Apr 02, w/atchs.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 May 02.
      Exhibit E. Applicant's response, dated 28 May 02.




      BARBARA A. WESTGATE
      Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01259

    Original file (BC-2002-01259.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01259 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to establish Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for his wife. The member's claim that he signed an "AF Form 10" requesting SBP coverage for his wife prior to retirement is without merit, since the form used to make an SBP election at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201220

    Original file (0201220.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01220 INDEX CODE 137.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he filed a timely election for termination of spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) before the first anniversary of his remarriage and be relieved from the SBP premium debt. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702057

    Original file (9702057.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of Air Force error or injustice. At the time of his divorce from his former spouse, he had no idea what SBP was, nor that he had converted his coverage to SBP coverage. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that his records should be corrected to reflect that he filed a timely election to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) beneficiary from his former spouse to his current spouse.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01011

    Original file (BC-2002-01011.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He retired effective 1 February 2002 and is currently receiving retired pay. By law, once a member completes 20 years of TAFMS and applies for retired pay, the RCSBP election is no longer valid and the member must make an SBP election. However, he did receive SBP cost information when he elected RCSBP coverage in 1986.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201011

    Original file (0201011.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He retired effective 1 February 2002 and is currently receiving retired pay. By law, once a member completes 20 years of TAFMS and applies for retired pay, the RCSBP election is no longer valid and the member must make an SBP election. However, he did receive SBP cost information when he elected RCSBP coverage in 1986.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9802166

    Original file (9802166.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was advised that his wife’s SBP annuity would be offset by DIC. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Prior to his disability retirement, effective 20 Jul 68, the applicant made an election under the RSFPP. However, his surviving spouse receives a refund of SBP premiums resulting from the reduction to the SBP annuity after the VA awards DIC.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00667

    Original file (BC-2002-00667.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the very least the retiree should be given the opportunity to accept or decline further SBP enrollment when the new spouse is enrolled in DEERS. In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a letter from his spouse, his retiree account statements (dated 11 and 24 January 2002), and a letter from DFAS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: Through his member of Congress, applicant provided a personal statement,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03448

    Original file (BC-2002-03448.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues of the Afterburner are mailed to the correspondence address each retiree provides to the finance center. It is each member’s responsibility to notify DFAS-CL of their current correspondence address, regardless of their pay status. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-03448 in Executive Session on 21 January 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. David C. VanGasbeck,Panel Chair Ms....

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9700619

    Original file (9700619.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Air Force indicated the applicant elected reduced spouse and child coverage The SBP counselor at d o ; F B , Nevada, provided verification that the applicant‘s wife did not attend the 4 Sep 96 SBP pre-retirement briefing. There is no evidence of error or injustice in this case and DPPTR recommends the requested relief be denied. The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 21 May 98, under the provisions of Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200491

    Original file (0200491.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00491 INDEX CODE 137.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His child-only Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage be terminated upon his retirement from the Air Force. The member was found competent for pay and records on 20 January 1995. The AFPC/DPPTR evaluation is at Exhibit...