RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01229
INDEX CODE: 113.04
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Joint Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (JSUPT) Active Duty
Service Commitment (ADSC) be reduced from ten (10) years to eight (8)
years; and, that the start date of his ADSC be changed from Mar 01 to
Jan 99.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When he began his flying training in May 97, his ADSC was eight years.
The delay between his removal from training in 1998 and subsequent
reinstatement caused him to be placed under the 10-year ADSC. Since
his removal from flying training in Oct 98 was unjust and was
overturned by the AFBCMR, it would be an additional injustice for him
to remain under the 10-year ADSC. The start date for his ADSC should
also be based on his original graduation date of Jan 99.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided documentation
pertaining to a previous AFBCMR decision and his ADSC.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Personnel Data System (PDS) indicates
that the applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
captain, having been promoted to that grade on 2 May 01. His Total
Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is 9 May 97.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSFO noted that the applicant accepted training and signed for
an eight-year ADSC (13 Jan 2007) in accordance with AFI 36-2107,
Active Duty Service Commitments and Specified Period of Time Contracts
(SPTC), dated 6 Jul 94 (version in effect at the time), Table 1.4,
Rule 6. He was eliminated from UPT on 10 Nov 98 and correctly signed
for a two-year commitment (30 Nov 2000), in accordance with AFI 36-
2107, Table 1.8, Rule 11. The applicant was reinstated to flying
duties by the AFBCMR (Docket Number 99-00412) on 12 Aug 99. He was
cleared for flying duties and completed JSUPT on 30 Mar 2001 and
correctly accepted a 10-year ADSC (29 Mar 11) in accordance with AFI
36-2107, Active Duty Service Commitments, dated 1 Jun 2000 (version in
effect at the time), Table 1.1, Rule 7.
AFPC/DPSFO stated that AFI 36-2107, dated 1 Jun 00, did in fact change
the UPT/JSUPT commitment from eight years to 10 years effective 1 Jun
00 and he correctly received the 10-year ADSC. However, they
indicated that they concur with the applicant’s belief that he
unjustly received the 10-year UPT ADSC. The applicant was originally
counseled under the eight-year policy and it was not his fault the
board reinstated him in to the 10-year ADSC policy. They agree it
would be more appropriate for him to receive the eight-year ADSC.
However, they believe it should be applied beginning upon completion
of his actual UPT graduation date (30 Mar 2001). In their view,
applying an eight-year ADSC to this date would be more appropriate
than applying it to a projected graduation date. According to
AFPC/DPSFO, there are no provisions in the AFI to retroactively use a
projected date.
AFPC/DPSFO noted the applicant’s contention regarding Aviator Career
Incentive Pay (ACIP). They indicated that they have no way of
projecting ACIP eligibility or entitlements for 2007 and 2011, nor
would it affect their recommendation for his appropriate UPT ADSC
date.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSO evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In his response, the applicant indicated that his unjust removal from
pilot training has had severe repercussions on his career. Many of
these repercussions cannot be remedied. However, the
length and start date of his ADSC and the implications it carries are
within the Board’s authority to correct.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an injustice regarding the applicant’s request that his
ADSC be reduced from 10 years to eight years. Having carefully
reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of
AFPC/DPSFO and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision
that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an
injustice. Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s records be
corrected as set forth below.
4. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice concerning the applicant’s request
that the start date of his ADSC be changed from Mar 01 to Jan 99. We
note that the applicant completed JSUPT on 30 Mar 01. As a result,
his ADSC commenced on that date. He believes that had he not been
removed earlier from flying training, he would have completed training
in Jan 99. However, there is nothing presented before us which
guarantees that had not the applicant been removed from training, he
would have completed his training in Jan 99. As such, we agree with
AFPC/DPSFO it is appropriate that his ADSC should begin on this date.
In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of sufficient evidence to
the contrary, the applicant’s request is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his Active Duty
Service Commitment (ADSC) incurred as a result of his completion of
the Joint Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training was established as
eight years vice ten years.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
01229 in Executive Session on 30 Jul 02, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Edward C. Koenig III, Panel Chair
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Mar 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSFO, dated 7 Jun 02.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Jun 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, applicant, dated 1 Jul 02.
EDWARD C. KOENIG III
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-01229
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that his Active Duty Service
Commitment (ADSC) incurred as a result of his completion of the Joint
Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training was established as eight
years vice ten years.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AFPC/DPSFO noted that the applicant graduated UPT in Nov 95 and incurred an eight-year ADSC in accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-2107, Active Duty Service Commitments (ADSC) and Specified Period of Time Contracts (SPTC), Table 1.4, Rule 6, dated 6 Jul 94. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSFO evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her response, the applicant indicated that the original...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00812
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00812 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2107, Active Duty Service Commitments, Note 1, The Air Force Academy classes of 1998 and 1999 will incur an ADSC of...
It indicates, in part, that the applicant claims he requested (and subsequently was denied) to attend C-141B IQT after having been assigned to XXXX AFB for just 1.5 years in order to “prevent from extending [his] ADSC.” If applicant had been allowed to attend C- 141B IQT at this point in his career (Feb 98), he would have approximately four years and two months left of his UPT ADSC. Applicant believes he was wrong when he stated that applicant “voluntarily requested and accepted the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00380
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2007-00380 INDEX NUMBER: 100.07 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 AUG 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) be changed to an eight-year commitment. It further stated, if the ADSC changed, he would serve...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00937
This exam is required for all students being considered for elimination to ensure students are “medically qualified at the time of any non-medical disenrollment.” As a result, the applicant was to be reinstated into training following a Medical Hold status to resolve the medical issue. At the time of her elimination, there was a policy allowing up to 6 months in Medical Hold before students would be considered for elimination. Then following the 3-month Medical Hold, the Flight Surgeon...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00252 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His three-year Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) incurred as a result of his completion of T-37 Pilot Instructor Training be reduced by 16 months. Even if the applicant’s request to reduce his PIT ADSC by 16 months is approved his...
Furthermore, he had to wait five months beyond his Date Expected Return from Overseas (DEROS) for an MWS training date involuntarily. Applicant further states that the time for training and waiting for training dates equates to 11 months of commitment beyond his pilot training ADSC. He also requests relief from the remaining 195 days of training time that he incurred outside of his initial eight-year UPT commitment.
Applicant’s complete statement and documentary evidence submitted in support of his application are included as Exhibit A. seven-year ADSC. Applicant was not contracted to attend UPT until well after the 15 June 1988 change to the eight-year ADSC (Exhibit C with Attachments 1 and 2).
On 12 March 1998, the applicant was presented an OFFICER/AIRMAN ACTIVE DUTY SERVICE COMMITMENT (ADSC) COUNSELING STATEMENT, AF Form 63, acknowledging that he would incur an eight-year ADSC upon completion of PV4PC (apparently pilot training), but he declined to sign the form. The issue of whether applicant had knowledge of his eight-year commitment becomes muddled because Academy graduates did not sign an AF Form 63 (or any other documentation) specifically setting out the commitment length...
Therefore, he requests that the three years spent in a non-flying assignment be considered as part of his current ADSC as it is for all those who were “banked.” If his ADSC is amended to March 2003, he will have served 11 years in the Air Force, which he feels is commensurate with the training he has received and is a longer TAFMSD than many of the “banked” pilots he graduated with. Applicant’s request is at Exhibit A. They are of the opinion that the time that matters is that time served...