The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant’s response is attached at Exhibit F. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03339 INDEX CODE: 100.00, 100.06 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable; the reason for her discharge be changed from Misconduct-Drug Abuse to Convenience of the Government; and her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code...
He was selected for promotion to SSgt prior to receiving punishment by Article 15. The applicant further states that he filed an inspector general (IG) complaint based on two issues: that he did not receive all of the evidence used against him and the investigation done was flawed and that the IO paraphrased or “summarized” witness statements in a way that was misleading in order to make a case against him. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...
AFBCMR 00-03343 INDEX NUMBER: 113.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
DPPD states the applicant has not submitted any material or documentation to show that he was improperly rated or processed under the provisions of military disability laws and policy in effect at the time of his permanent disability retirement. Therefore, DPPD recommends the applicant’s request be denied (Exhibit D). ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and submitted...
EPR profile since 1997 reflects the following: PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL 22 Apr 97 4 * 30 Jan 98 1 30 May 98 4 30 Sep 98 5 10 Jul 99 5 14 May 00 5 * Contested report _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, Enlisted Promotion and Military Testing Branch, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed this application and states that based on the applicant’s date of rank for senior airman, the first time the report was...
DFAS has no record of the applicant submitting a valid SBP disenrollment request during the authorized timeframe to submit a request to terminate his enrollment in SBP. In this respect, PL 105-85 provides a one-year window of opportunity to disenroll from the SBP provided the service member submits a completed DD Form 2656-2, with the notarized signature of the beneficiary concurring with the termination of the SBP. _________________________________________________________________ The...
Members of the Board, Mr. David C. VanGasbeck, Mr. Richard A. Peterson, and Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr. considered this application on 18 July 2001. DAVID C. VANGASBECK Panel Chair Attachment: Letter, ANG/DPFP, dated 11 Jun 01 AFBCMR 00-03351 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
INDEX CODE 131.09 131.01 AFBCMR 00-03353 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
He be promoted to the grade of captain in 1945 upon separation from active duty or in 1950 after serving an additional five years in the Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded a DFC since he and the pilot were recommended at the same time and for the same mission and the pilot received his DFC; or in the alternative, he should be awarded the DFC based on the completion of 35 combat missions. A complete...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03359 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the grade of captain in 1945 upon separation from active duty or in 1950 after serving an additional five years in the Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The...
He received 4 years for completing medical school and 3 years, 2 months and 1 day for time spent as a medical corps officer in the Reserve of the Air Force. Applicant believes he should be fully credited for the time spent in completing his degrees, which would be an additional 3 years credit. PATRICK R. WHEELER Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-03364 INDEX CODE: 102.08 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, stated that the applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. Since his discharge occurred over 48 years ago and considering he was only 19...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
INDEX CODE 112.07 AFBCMR 00-03376 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be granted on the basis of clemency, if a check of his Federal Bureau of Investigation, (FBI) record proves negative (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the official documents at Exhibit B and the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. The discharge authority reviewed the case and approved the recommendation for discharge and directed that she be given a UOTHC discharge. The records indicate the...
INDEX CODE: 112.05 AFBCMR 00-03383 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AFBCMR 00-03385 INDEX CODE: 107.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
AFBCMR 00-03389 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: xxxxxxxxxxxx, xxx-xx-xxxx Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be...
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. We therefore agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit B.
According to his DD Form 214, he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 June 1974. On 3 May 2001, the applicant’s request that his inactive time of 14 days be credited as active service in order that he be credited with a 20- year retirement was considered and denied by the Board (see Exhibit E). ____________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After reviewing the applicant’s request and the additional documentation, we are not persuaded to credit the...
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, and Mr. Frederick R. Beaman III considered this application on 30 January 2001. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO, dtd 13 Dec 00, with attachment AFBCMR 00-03396 INDEX CODE: 131.10 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not available at the time the application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03400 INDEX CODES: 100.06, 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, reviewed this...
Additionally, the applicant provided no facts warranting an upgrade of the discharge he received. On 16 March 2001, the Board staff requested the applicant provide post- service documentation within thirty (30) days (Exhibit F). Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 16 February 2001.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Members of the Board Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Mr. Joseph A. Roj, and Lawrence R. Leehy, considered this application on 8 March 2001. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd Feb 19, 01 AFBCMR 00-03404 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced,...
Based on travel documents provided by the applicant (Exhibit A), he departed Keflavic for Baltimore, MD on 2 Jul 00. While the Air Force recommends some reimbursement based on the approved GSA program, we believe the applicant, who acted in good faith, is entitled to full reimbursement for the costs he actually incurred for official travel. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 4 May 01.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's requests and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03414 COUNSEL: GEORGE E DAY HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 16 April 1997 to 15 April 1998 be expunged from his records; promotion to Senior Master Sergeant (SMSgt) with a date of rank appropriate to his promotion sequence number in 1998 with...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00257 COUNSEL: GARY N. MYERS HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 23 March 1999 to 25 April 2000 be expunged from his records. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, AFMPC/DPPPWB, also...
AFBCMR 01-00001 INDEX NUMBER: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Inquiries/Special Actions Section, AFPC/DPPPWB, also reviewed this application and states that based on the applicant’s date of rank for master sergeant, the first time the report will be considered for promotion will be cycle 02E8 to senior master sergeant (promotions effective Apr 02 - Mar 03). A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application. Exhibit B.
This implies that he is two days short of meeting the requirement as an officer with over four years of enlisted active duty service when, in actuality, he has 1461 days of prior enlisted active duty service, which totals four years and one day exactly. The Director, AFRBA, continued by stating that the OPR advises that the applicant’s prior enlisted service was properly computed and recommends that the application be denied. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...
AFBCMR 01-00021 INDEX NUMBER: 128.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman, was discharged from the Air Force on 13 May 1981 under the provisions of AFM 39-12 (Misocnduct- Drug Abuse - Board), with an undesirable discharge. In this case, the applicant provided no facts warranting an upgrade of the discharge he received. Therefore, we agree with opinions and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
He also completed three missions as a B-17F navigator. During World War II, the 8th Air Force had an established policy whereby a DFC was awarded upon the completion of 30 combat flight missions and an AM was awarded upon the completion of five missions. In 1944, the 8th Air Force required completion of 30 combat flight missions; however, the applicant did not complete 30 missions.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Members of the Board Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Mr. Timothy Beyland, and Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., considered this application on 3 Apr 01. Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Ltr, applicant, undtd AFBCMR 01-00028 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced,...