RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03379
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC)
discharge be upgraded. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided
an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be granted on
the basis of clemency, if a check of his Federal Bureau of Investigation,
(FBI) record proves negative (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
On 27 February 1999, the AFBCMR requested the applicant provide post-
service documentation (Exhibit E).
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at
Exhibit F. The FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and
response (Exhibit G).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office to either the
advisory opinion, the request for post-service documentation or the FBI
report.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to
warrant corrective action. We note that the Air Force recommends clemency
based on his overall record and his apparent post-service contributions to
the community, if his FBI record is clean. However, a review of his FBI
record indicates that the applicant’s misconduct has apparently continued
and this has not been rebutted by the applicant.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only
be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was
not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Henry Romo, Jr., Mr. William H. Anderson, and Mr.
John E. B. Smith considered this application on 3 May 2001 in accordance
with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the governing
statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
HENRY ROMO, JR.
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
E. AFBCMR Ltr Requesting Post-Service Documentation
F. FBI Report
G. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding FBI Report
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board’s request of 10 December 1998, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided a copy of an investigation report, which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D) The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). On 14...
On 23 April 1963, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s appeal for an upgrade of his discharge (Exhibit B). Accordingly, they recommend his records remain the same. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we find no impropriety in the characterization of applicant's discharge.
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation provided a copy of an Investigative Report (FBI No. Exhibit D. FBI Investigation Report #890324C Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 24 Aug 01, and AFBCMR, dated 19 Sep 01.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Military Personnel Management Specialist, Separation Branch, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states that the applicant provided no evidence indicating that he was the victim of an error or an injustice. DPPRS recommends that since the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) on 4 October 1993 (Exhibit F) . The applicant provided additional new evidence pertaining to his post-service activities for possible reconsideration of his application (Exhibit G ) . 1552. r Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 4 Oct 93 Exhibit G. Letter from applicant, undated, with Exhibit H. FBI Investigative Report, PCN 980446910621 additional evidence Panel Chair V
The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit E. The FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit F). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably...
Considered alone, the Board concludes the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 2 Nov 49, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Panel...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00105
Considered alone, the Board concludes the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 2 Nov 49, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Panel...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01970 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that other than going AWOL, he has a clean service record. Considered alone, we conclude...