AFBCMR 01-00030 INDEX NUMBER: 137.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. PEGGY E. GORDON Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The most current duty assignment entry on the CY99A OSB was changed to “16 Jul 99, Deputy Chief, Combat Forces Division.” (A copy of the corrected Officer Selection Brief (OSB) reviewed by the CY99A SSB is provided as an attachment to Exhibit C.) The applicant was not selected by the SSBs. A complete copy of his response, with 8 attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Assignment Procedures &...
Members of the Board, Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., and Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., considered this application on 20 March 2001. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 19 Feb 2001 AFBCMR 01-00037 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
She provided a letter from a new commander in which he proposes retroactive promotions based on his review of the records and opinion that her weight problem was outside her control and that her duty performance warranted such promotions. Had this been known, her previous commander would have requested promotion from the wing commander. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AFBCMR 01-00041 INDEX NUMBER: 128.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
INDEX CODE: 135.05 AFBCMR 01-00042 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, Mr. Frederick Beaman, III, Mr. John E. Pettit, and Mr. Christopher Carey considered this...
DPRCC recommends that his records be changed to reflect that he received a Secretarial waiver to receive FSA-II during this period (see Exhibit B). However, it is our opinion that his records should be corrected to show that he was authorized to receive FSA for the period of time that his spouse was pregnant and was unable to obtain the required medical clearance. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separation Procedures Manager, HQ AFPC/DPPRR stated that, in accordance with the governing Air Force regulation, the race is to be entered as shown on the member’s enlistment record. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected by issuing a new DD Form...
Members of the Board Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Ms. Martha Maust, and Mr. Philip Sheuerman considered this application on 30 August 2001. PATRICK R. WHEELER Panel Chair Attachments Ltr, AFLSA/JAJM, dtd 8 Jun 01 Ltr, AFPC/DPPP, dtd 1 Aug 01 AFBCMR 01-00049 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction...
INDEX CODE: 137.04 AFBCMR 01-00051 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00053 INDEX CODE: 128.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for travel expenses incurred from a temporary duty assignment (TDY) from Los Angeles, CA to Brooks AFB, TX. The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records,...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00055 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed $214.00 for cost of personally procuring a commercial airline ticket for official travel expenses for his temporary duty (TDY) to Brooks AFB, TX. ...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Regardless of his unfortunate circumstances; i.e., a fifth grade education, an undesirable discharge, lack of work and financial burdens, he managed to raise five upstanding children, work steadily, provide a good home and education for his family and he is a respected member of his community. The applicant was subsequently discharged on 7 October 1955, in the grade of A3C with an undesirable discharge, under the provisions of AFR 35-66 (Homosexuality). ...
The Consultant recommends that the narrative reason be changed to “Conditions that Interfere with Military Service, Mental Disorders,” leaving her SPD and RE codes unchanged. Ms. Looney voted to deny and has submitted a Minority Report, which is at Exhibit F. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Dec 00, w/atchs. RITA S. LOONEY Panel Chair AFBCMR 01-00064 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the...
AFBCMR 01-00067 INDEX CODE: 128.14 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR 01-00068 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AFBCMR 01-00082 INDEX CODE: 110.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The applicant was found to meet the size standards for entry into SUPT. Based on the recommendation of medical personnel, the commander of the applicant’s flying training squadron authorized a temporary (not to exceed six months) medical deferral for Phase I of the Weight Management Program and the applicant was reentered into training, Class 98-15, on 13 Nov 97. The applicant was notified on the AETC form 126A, Record of Commander’s Review Action, that he was being considered for...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AFBCMR 01-00094 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00095 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted a terminal leave promotion to the grade of captain. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Officer Promotion Section, AFPC/DPPPO, reviewed the applicant’s request and recommended...
Promotion eligibility is regained only after receiving an EPR with an overall rating of “3” or higher that is not a referral report, and closes out on or before the Promotion Eligibility Cutoff Date (PECD) for the next cycle. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. The Chief, Performance Evaluations Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPEP, also reviewed the appeal and notes the Medical Consultant’s review of the applicant’s medical condition. A complete copy of the evaluation...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
They further state that the applicant met the active duty requirement and participated in the Reserve and Guard for three years six months. Applicant served in the Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard for three years and six months. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: a.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As noted by the Air Force, in the advisory opinion, dated 27 March 2001, the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) has been added to the applicant’s DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharged from Active Duty).
A letter was submitted requesting a copy of the IG Investigative report pertaining to the applicant and SMSgt F- ---. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Mar 01 for review and response within 30 days. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of her appeal, we do...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00107 INDEX CODE: 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The level of review in Section VIII of his Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), closing 18 Aug 98, be upgraded to reflect Senior Rater’s indorsement. The Director, Air Force Review Boards Agency accepted the recommendation by the Board...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair Exhibits: A.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00110 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE SSN HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests his Undesirable Discharge be upgraded to a General (Under Honorable Conditions) Discharge. Applicant's military personnel records were destroyed by fire in 1973. The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
AFBCMR 01-00111 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to [applicant], be corrected to show that: a. If he is considered and not selected for promotion to the grade of major with the Army reports as a matter of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00113 INDEX CODE: 128.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed $658.00 for the cost of self-procuring a commercial airline ticked to her new duty station. Exhibit B. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR 01-00113 INDEX CODE: 128.09 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Mr. Philip Sheuerman, and Mr. Michael V. Barbino considered this application on 10 April 2001 Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Ltr, HQ ARPC/DPP, 8 Mar 01 AFBCMR 01-00115 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
In support of his request applicant provided a copy of his 17 Dec 96 OPR; Grand Forks County District Court orders; his criminal record check; statements from his rater and additional rater; and, his Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) decision. Although the Grand Forks County District Court dismissed the charges against him, when the rater signed and referred the OPR on 2 Jan 96, the statement on the OPR was a true and accurate statement (see Exhibit C). We took notice of...
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The contested report does not meet Air Force standards for a valid referral report and no performance feedback, contrary to information included in the OPR, from the rater was given stating he was performing below standards. After reviewing the evidence of record, we believe that the applicant’s performance was based on factors other than his actual performance of duties. ...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AFBCMR 01-00129 INDEX NUMBER: 121.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AFBCMR 01-00130 INDEX NUMBER: 121.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00131 INDEX CODE: 128.09 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed $558 for the cost of self-procuring commercial airline tickets from Tinker AFB, Oklahoma, to her new duty station at Maxwell AFB, Alabama. Her dependents meet the requirements established by Chapter 7, Section...
AFBCMR 01-00133 INDEX NUMBER: 121.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AFBCMR 01-00134 INDEX NUMBER: 121.00, 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The date stamp on each document field in the officer selection record (OSR) reflects the date the document was filed and became an official matter of record. In addition, we recommend his record to include the reaccomplished report closing 5 June 2000, be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by SSB for the CY00A selection board. It is further recommended that his record, to include the reaccomplished OPR closing 5 June 2000, be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel...