Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100023
Original file (0100023.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  01-00023

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He should be awarded the DFC since he completed 30 missions.

The applicant states that as a member of the  34th  Bombardment  Group,  8th
Air Force, in Mendelshan, England, he flew 29 aerial missions.  On his  30th
mission, the flight ended with their crash landing  in  Paris,  France.   At
the time, the standard for award of the DFC was completion of 30 missions.

In support of the appeal, applicant submits statements from crewmembers   of
the 30th mission, copies of his Individual Flight Record,  a  photograph  of
the plane after the crash landing, a Certificate of Honor (29 missions)  and
an article from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s Master Personnel Records were destroyed by fire in  1973  at
the National  Personnel  Records  Center  (NPRC)  in  St.  Louis,  Missouri.
Therefore, the following facts have  been  extracted  from  the  documention
provided by applicant.

The applicant is a former Army Air Corps  first  lieutenant  who  served  on
active duty during the period 24 December 1943 through 13 November 1945.

During the period 30 April 1944 through 8 October 1944,  the  applicant  was
assigned to the 4th Bombardment Squadron as a  B-24  “Liberator”  navigator.
He also completed three missions as a B-17F navigator.  During  this  period
he completed 29 missions over France and Germany, to  include  two  missions
on D-Day over Normandy.  He was awarded the Air Medal with  third  Oak  Leaf
Clusters (AM, 3 OLC).

The AM is awarded for heroic or meritorious achievement while  participating
in aerial flight.

The Distinguished Flying Cross DFC) was established by  Congress  on  2 July
1926  and  is  awarded  for  heroism  or  extraordinary  achievement   while
participating in aerial flight.  The performance of the act of heroism  must
be evidenced by voluntary action above and beyond the call of duty.

During World War II, the 8th Air Force had an established policy  whereby  a
DFC was awarded upon the completion of 30 combat flight missions and  an  AM
was awarded upon the completion of five missions.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The  Chief,  Recognition   Programs   Branch,   AFPC/DPPPR,   reviewed   the
application and states that unfortunately, the applicant’s records  can  not
be located by the National  Personnel  Records  Center  (NPRC).   Therefore,
they can not verify that the applicant was  recommended  for  award  of  the
DFC, that the recommendation was submitted into  official  channels,  or  if
such a recommendation was approved or disapproved.  In  1944,  the  8th  Air
Force required  completion  of  30  combat  flight  missions;  however,  the
applicant did not complete 30 missions.  The cited flight to Paris,  is  not
considered a completed mission  since  the  aircraft  did  not  return.   In
addition, the flight was not a combat flight  mission  -  it  was  a  supply
mission.  Furthermore, a written recommendation for  the  DFC  was  required
then, as it is today.  Although the other crewmembers state that the  entire
crew received the DFC for having completed  30  missions,  no  documentation
was provided to substantiate  this  statement.   Therefore,  they  recommend
denial of applicant’s request.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that  a  28  June
1944 entry on his AAF Form 5 indicates the  flight  of  four  hours  and  45
minutes was aborted and was not credited as a combat  mission;  however,  he
should have received credit for the flight as a combat  mission.   According
to the offical  records  of  the  34th  Bombarbment  Group,  the  12  planes
involved in the 28 June 1944 mission failed  to  bomb.   There  is  a  clear
distinction in the official records between a plane  that  aborted  and  one
that failed to bomb.  Documentation regarding the  missions  on  2  July,  6
July, and 8 July indicate that the credit sorties  included  the  number  of
planes that failed to bomb.  While they took off and  went  to  the  target,
they, as a formation, were unable to release  their  bombs  due  to  adverse
weather over the target.  However, the  mission  was  counted  as  a  combat
mission by the group.

Applicant’s complete response is attached at Exhibit F.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of probable error or injustice warranting award of  the  DFC.   In
this respect, we note that in 1944, the 8th Air  Force  required  completion
of 30 combat flight missions for  award  of  the  DFC.  In  support  of  the
appeal, the applicant provides statements from the  pilot  and  co-pilot  of
his former aircrew indicating that he flew on  all  of  their  31  missions,
except one.  Furthermore, these statements also  indicate  that  the  entire
crew received the  DFC  for  having  completed  30  missions.   Although  no
official documentation has been provided to substantiate  these  statements,
the NPRC has been unable  to  locate  the  applicant’s  records  and  it  is
presumed they were destroyed by fire in 1972.  In view of  this,  and  since
we have no reason to question the integrity of these World War II  aviators,
we believe this doubtful issue should be decided in the applicant’s  behalf.
 In view of this, and given the  total  number  of  missions  the  applicant
completed,  we  believe  he  should  be  awarded  the  DFC.   Therefore,  we
recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 7 October  1944,  he  was  awarded
the Distinguished Flying Cross for extraordinary achievement, while  serving
as a Navigator on B-24 airplanes on many  bombardment  missions  over  enemy
occupied Continental Europe.

_________________________________________________________________






The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 7 June 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
                       Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Member
                       Ms. Diana Arnold, Member

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Dec 00, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, undated, w/atchs.
     Exhibit C.  SAF/MIBR, dated 30 Mar 01.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 24 Apr 01.
     Exhibit E.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 7 May 01.
     Exhibit F.  Letter, Applicant, dated 22 May 01, w/atchs.




                                  THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                  Vice Chair

AFBCMR 01-00023




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 7 October 1944,  he  was
awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for extraordinary achievement,  while
serving as a Navigator on B-24 airplanes on many bombardment  missions  over
enemy occupied Continental Europe.









JOE G. LINEBERGER

Director

Air Force Review Boards Agency


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02073

    Original file (BC-2005-02073.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states, among other things, that but for the applicant’s actions on 5 June 1944, the mission’s command pilot would have been in severe shock and unconscious in a matter of minutes and incapable of the aircraft flight maneuvers for which he was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Based on the established 8th Air Force policy of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02299

    Original file (BC-2005-02299.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02299 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded an additional oak leaf cluster to the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2004-02294

    Original file (bc-2004-02294.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    During the period in question, he was told by a major at base headquarters that upon returning stateside, he would receive the DFC for his completion of a tour of 32 combat missions and an oak leaf cluster to the DFC for his completion of 14 lead missions. Under the revised policy, the DFC could be awarded for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. In view of this statement, and given the total number of missions the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003359

    Original file (0003359.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He be promoted to the grade of captain in 1945 upon separation from active duty or in 1950 after serving an additional five years in the Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded a DFC since he and the pilot were recommended at the same time and for the same mission and the pilot received his DFC; or in the alternative, he should be awarded the DFC based on the completion of 35 combat missions. A complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00453

    Original file (BC-2007-00453.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00453 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 August 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, First Oak Leaf Cluster (DFC, 1 OLC) and the Air Medal, Fifth Oak Leaf Cluster (AM, 5 OLC). The DFC was established...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02179

    Original file (BC-2005-02179.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02179 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In addition, based on the Eighth Air Force policy...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900902

    Original file (9900902.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Since he flew with the same aircrew for 28 missions and was on the 17 February 1945 mission for which the navigator of his aircrew was awarded the DFC through the correction of record process, he should be awarded the DFC. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that in his opinion all ten aircrew members exhibited heroic and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00510

    Original file (BC-2007-00510.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was never awarded an additional AM for his 26th through 30th combat missions In support of the appeal, applicant submits a statement from the former 67th Deputy Squadron Navigator recommending him for award of the DFC and an additional oak leaf cluster to the AM, and a list of his combat missions. The DFC was established by Congress on 2 July 1926 and is awarded for heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00420

    Original file (BC-2007-00420.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In view of his completion of a total of 37 combat missions and based on the Eighth Air Force established policy of awarding an AM upon the completion of every five heavy bomber missions and awarding a DFC upon the completion of 35 combat missions, he should be awarded the DFC and an additional AM. In view of the above, and since the applicant never received a DFC for his completion of a combat...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01548

    Original file (BC-2007-01548.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01548 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 November 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded two oak leaf clusters to the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and three additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In view of the above,...