AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
PERSONAL APPEARANCE x | RECORD REVIEW
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
TYPE GEN |
ry
- VOTE OF THE | ce
| HON GEN voTHc | OTHER | DENY
xX
xX
xX
Xx
Xx
, ; Te a ae TEED TE PROARD Go
1a A94.05 LARA OUTS A67.10 joey EXHIBITS SUBMITT HD TO THE BOARD
1 /ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE _
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF —
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
05 Aug 2010 FD-2009-00142
| OAPPL PSISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATION ACE ARE DISCUSSED ON. THE ATTACHED AIR LORCE DISCHARGE REV
EW SOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.
i i
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
-
MADURSEMENT VAL apeareue, : :
TO: FROM:
2 AR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
SAP/MRBR ner ere ar AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
5350 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, [X 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
(EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00142
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He admits that he was young and
made mistakes. He desires to have his discharge upgraded for “gainful” employment. ‘The records indicated
the applicant received an Article 15, four Letters of Reprimand, and two Letters of Counscling for
misconduct. His misconduct included failure to keep sufficient funds in his account (3x), violation of curfew
policy, sleeping on duty, disobeying a lawful order, and failure to maintain minimum weight standards. The
DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change xxhis
negative behavior. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the
positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the
applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative duc process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00156
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND GR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THE:BOARD MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x x x SS ws 7 jl — ms mm Tr a 5 ms ae Tn ISSUES A93.19 INDEX NUMBER AG67.10 EXHIBITS SU MIL EES A93.23 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THEBOARD A94.05 2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00588
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Pe AMN P| TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW . The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct, especially his unlawful...
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00113
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Upon review of the record, the Board was unable to find any documentation regarding the discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00021
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW “COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL TAP oa eta i faces a Fa cM TE ORE BORD ie ; GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x ~ _ 7 | x | x | Xx = oe maT ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.9 0 & § SL BMITTED TO THE BOARD. APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING —_ aie tw HEARING DATE CASE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00030
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE - xX RECORD REVIEW eco a __ Te at oo NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ e+ e+ xr Xa+ ISSUES A94.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ea Nl ae A93.01 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD __ 2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION . *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00389
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00188
VOTE OF THE BOARD iis MEMBER SITTING | HON | GEN UOTHC OTHER | DENY x x x xX - T x 2 5, se * r NAT a TEES Te rary LT ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.00 oo : EXTIEBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD ds A92,21 1 [ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ; 4 |BRIRF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD | ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PFRSONAL APPEARANCE ‘TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE : CASE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00093
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIMF OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 01 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00093 CC OAPPLICANT’SASSUB AND. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.
AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00301
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION TYPE GEN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL oes MEMBER SITTING OTHER DENY xX x | | Xx Xx x ISSUES A93.11 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00348
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge.