NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
Amn e eee ee ee ees mee
ams te mew eee eee eR RR
GRADE AFSN/SSAN
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
application to the AFBCMR.
TO:
SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW
a NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING HON GEN voTHC | OTHER DENY
xX
xX
xX
xX
X
ISSUES AOL 43 INDEX NUMBER A67.00 Ee : f
A94.55 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2. |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
08 May 2012 FD-2010-00113
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
a UML:
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00113
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct
Applicant contends his discharge was inequitable because it was based on an isolated incident. The record
indicates the applicant pled guilty and was convicted under a General Court Martial for possession of
cocaine, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and transporting an illegal drug in a government
vehicle. Upon review of the record, the Board was unable to find any documentation regarding the
discharge. Due to lack of evidence and supporting documentation to explain the discharge, the Board
concludes that the misconduct was a significant departure from the conduct expected of all military
members. The Board relies on the presumption of regularity and finds the characterization; reason for
discharge and the reenlistment code were appropriate.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00007
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN t TYPE UOTHC PERSONAL APPEARANCE x | RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY - ee eee Xx xX x ‘ Xx : xX ISSUES AOI 25 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 A85.01 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A94.05 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00133
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW >) COUNSEL °.."''| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL HON GEN “UO” THC OTHER X Xx x x x ISSUES A94 00 UNG A UVEEE A67 10 d ae a EXHIBITS SUBMITT ED TO THE THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00441
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his three years of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00032
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the available service record. The record indicates that the applicant was discharged for Misconduct—Drug Abuse.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00317
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW . The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. Although the Board did not condone the applicant’s misconduct, they found that based on his entire record and personal circumstances at the time of discharge...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00600
ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN —— ‘ TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX xX Xx Xx aon vee Xx ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 : EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING TELE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00050
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW Pee 7 .| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL Ee OTHER DENY MEMBER SITTING ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 [eee «EX 11Bl Ss 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOVIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00001
ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A84.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A94,55 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL VILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 17 Dec 2009 FD-2009-00001 APPLICANT'S ISSUE-AND THE:BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE:ATTACHED AIR FORCEDISCHARGE REVIEW:...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00172
COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 (EF-V2) CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00172 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, three Letters of Reprimand and a Letter of Counseling for misconduct.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00021
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW “COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL TAP oa eta i faces a Fa cM TE ORE BORD ie ; GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x ~ _ 7 | x | x | Xx = oe maT ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.9 0 & § SL BMITTED TO THE BOARD. APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING —_ aie tw HEARING DATE CASE...