Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00188
Original file (FD-2009-00188.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE ~ xX | RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ ~— ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
- — ~~ aon! VOTE OF THE BOARD iis
MEMBER SITTING | HON | GEN UOTHC OTHER | DENY
x
x
x
xX
- T
x
2 5, se * r NAT a TEES Te rary LT
ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.00 oo : EXTIEBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD ds
A92,21 1 [ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ;
4 |BRIRF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
| ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PFRSONAL APPEARANCE
‘TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE : CASE NUMBER i —
24 Jun 2010 FD-2009-00188

 

 

 

AEPLICANT'S KSEE ANDTHE BOARD'S. DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR. FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE,”

 

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

 

 

 

ety
gear eee ORSEMENT ; ‘ ‘ ‘ SANT RE CTU:
TO FROM:
SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
Sis cers nog AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, $3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPU AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EI-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE

FD-2009-00188

 

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

Issue 1: Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of her discharge. The applicant
does submit that she has matured since her discharge. The record indicates the applicant reccived two
Article 15s and a Letter of Reprimand for misconduct. Her misconduct included failure to go, failure to
remain in proper uniform, arrested for excessive speeding, attempted theft on Bank of America, making a
false official statement and stealing from another service member. The Board opined that through these
administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her behavior. They found the
seriousness of the willful misconduct of{set any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The

Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of
the discharge.

Issue 2. The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and has a good job. However, no
inequity or impropriety in her discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing. The Board
concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized her term of service.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant provided full administrative duc process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachinent:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00343

    Original file (FD-2010-00343.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. Attachment: Examiner's Brief CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00343 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00530

    Original file (FD-2008-00530.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTEOR-TIEE- BOARD HON GEN UOTHC / OTHER DENY x Xx x Xx L _| x | Issues SaaS NUMER rr = : “ED TO THE ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM A67.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THI BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00376

    Original file (FD-2010-00376.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00155

    Original file (FD2008-00155.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Pl AB a TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ‘VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY x x x xX xX _ EXHIBITS SUBMITTED:TO THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00092

    Original file (FD-2009-00092.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” VOTE OF THE BOARD a HON GEN UOTHC OTHER [ DENY xX x x x x ISSUES 4.94.95 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 BS Oo CEXETBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD oe LI JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD __ _ 2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_ [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION _ 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 24 Jun 2010 FD-2009-00092 APPL! FINDING: The Board denies the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00234

    Original file (FD2008-00234.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x xX x xX ISSUES A94,53 INDEX NUMBER A49.00 s 1 [ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00024

    Original file (FD-2009-00024.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X Xx Xx xX x t IN i O oe ISSUES A94.55 DEX NUMBER A67.30 bie EN TO THE BOARD = : 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00025

    Original file (FD-2009-00025.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his/her discharge. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments.

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00191

    Original file (FD2008-00191.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE , TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 07 Jul 2009 FD-2008-00191 APPLICANT'S. X = Upgrade, Reason for Discharge and Reenlistment Code INDORSEMENT — ae DATE: 7/14/21 To: } FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL SAF/MRBR AIR FORCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00103

    Original file (FD-2009-00103.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN po AMN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW ks | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL me ae “VOTE OF THE BO cue Pepi eae tla ROR HON GEN UOTHC xX x x X ISSUES Ag 4 gs INDEX NUMBER A67.10 a SS TS SUB} ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...