NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01504-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. case it was due to General...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01511-02
be al~l~lical~le naval record spouse t‘ornler spouse to 7 Messrs. hard, consisting of L. The allegations of error that the corrective action record. b. Petitioner enrolled in SBP for spouse coverage upon his retirement s~~l~~eq~~ently divorced on 1 011 Sel~tembel I4 March were 1993. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the and especially in light of the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01514-02
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01521-02
3. of error The Board, and ili.jiistice, finds 21s tOllows: having revicuml all the t;~~~ts of record pertainin, ~1 to Petitioner ’s allegations a. available b. That a copy of this Report ot’ Proceedings be filed in Petitioner ’s naval record. Records (32 Code of Federal present at the Board record of the Board ’s review and deliberations, ’s proceedings in the revisctl Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Ikgtllations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was and that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01527-01
After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with a general discharge on 6 October 1975. the Board concluded that you were fortunate to receive a general The discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01528-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting in effect, that the DD Form 214 and associated service record pages be corrected to show her current name and sex.2. However, the Board also believes that a correction to Petitioner’s DD Form 214, or any other parts of the service record, would be inappropriate since those records correctly show that a man named XXXserved in the Navy from 31 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01540-02
1552 Encl: ( I ) DD Form 149 w/attach~nents (2) NPC memo 1 160 Ser 8 I 11 I63 of 22 May 2002 (3) Sub.ject's naval record I'urstrant to the provisions o i reference (a), Silt,ject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure ( I ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that tlie applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone "B" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SUB) for tlie FC rating. Docket No: 1540-02 RECOMMENDATION: That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01541-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. must receive a fully honorable characterization of service in order to receive benefits. Based on the foregoing, you are neither eligible to receive basic educational benefits nor are you eligible to receive a refund of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01543-02
Alternatively, Petitioner requests removal of the record as an act of clemency. If he made such representations, Major state directly. Subj: BOARD FOR ICO MAJOR ) APPLICATION 5.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01550-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01557-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01576-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01583-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01584-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01589-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 1589-02 4 September 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01595-02
1552 Encl : (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum 1430 Ser (3) Subject ’s naval record 8 I I /067 of 3 April 2002 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. Nofziger, Suiter, and Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01597-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01598-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the Board concluded that the record fully supported processing for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01599-02
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81 attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment date of 18 December 2001 to reflect 01 January 2002 and receive the zone "B" SRB entitlement offered in reference (c).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01605-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Goldsmith, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01611-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 161 1-02 14 March 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that tlle applicable naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01614-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to payment of Civilian Clothing Allowance (CCA) for being directed to wear civilian clothes while on Temporary Additional Duty (TAD). The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 27 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01619-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01630-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your application, thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were given the options of Subsequently, based on your On 3 April 1957 You submitted your On 10 January 2002 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01631-02
With regard to the member's complaint of limitation of motion in her The member was neck, the medical board focuses on her neck surgery. exam was The member dermatomal distributions, but there's nothing in the claimed that she needed to walk with a cane, The medical board to suggest why she would member also complained of subjective pain in her low back which she said it made her difficult for her to sit for long periods of time. carpal tunnel syndrome with bilateral numbness which has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01633-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Goldsmith, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01638-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01639-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01642-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or to change the reason for your discharge, given the nonjudicial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01649-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Grove, and Nicholson, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 22 Janaury 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 1649-02 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that th reenlistment of 18 September 2000...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01651-00
discharge authority directed that you be given an opportunity to On 15 The request an administrative discharge board (ADB). After review in the Bureau of You essentially contend that you were improperly discharged In your application you are requesting, in effect, a change in the reason for your discharge so that you can receive separation pay- for misconduct based deficiency. The Board concluded that the general discharge by Accordingly, your application has been denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01667-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. he was authorized to enlist in his old rating (OS), but the ECM authorized him to come back in the initial active duty service date...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01669-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 yri LP: J Dockt~t No: IO July 2002 I669-02 1. filed enclosure corrected to Pursimt to slio~ the provisions of (1) with this rel~mmcc (a). 13curtl requesting. Sul!jt‘ct et‘l?ct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01672-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 8 1 attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01675-01
that you seek treatment for the post traumatic stress disorder from the Department of Veterans Affairs following your separation. You were discharged from the Navy on 16 April 1992 by reason of CONDITIONS You underwent a pre-separation physical - PERSONALITY DISORDERS ”. “OTHER PHYSICAL/MENTAL In his opinion, He also recommended The fact that you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder during your naval service was not considered probative of the existence of material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01679-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2002. The Board was likewise unable to find that the Commander, Naval Surface Reserve Force denied your right to an interview with him; that he inadequately reviewed the DFC documentation; or that he wrongfully concurred with and forwarded the DFC recommendation. Since the Board found that the DFC and related fitness report should stand, they had no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01682-01
After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with a general discharge by reason of misconduct on 7 March 1995. Applicable regulations reenlistment code when Since you misconduct. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01684-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 08 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01689-02
After careful and c record, the Board f insufficient to est error or injustice. After review by ity, the recommendation for separation was 3 discharged on 4 October 1985 with an other 3rge. correction of an official naval s on the applicant to demonstrate the e material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01693-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Mackey, and Geisler, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and illjustice on 12 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01694-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01697-02
yrj [,I’: J Docket No: IO July 2002 1697-02 Petitioner, record be DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CONCLUSIO N IJpon review contents of following corrective action (2), . warrantiiig th e and enclos~~i-e cr)nsitleratioll the ot‘ all 13r);~rtl tllc finds ot‘ record. of im injustice 111~~ esistence c\~iclericc and especially in light of the RECOMhlENDA’l‘IOl’!
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01700-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. of the officers and enlisted Marines who were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01703-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 15 September 2000 you received an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous entry due to drug abuse, and you were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01711-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. unauthorized absence be removed from your record because of your You are now requesting that unspecified periods of good service after you were restored to duty...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01712-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01712-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Eligibility for federal education benefit programs is determined by the member's initial entrance onto active duty other than for training. without enrollment in the MGIB Program, would have no education benefits.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01713-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01716-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive on. In this regard, it noted that available records do not indicate that you served in The Board questioned the validity of In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge is erroneous or unjust, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01722-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 8 1 attached. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference 4.