DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 1667-02
20 August 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser
copy of which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
32/6148 of 25 July 2002, a
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1133
Ser
25
32/6lcl%
Ju\
02
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Commander,
Executive Director,
Navy Recruiting Command
Board for Correction of Naval Records
BCNR REQUEST IC
(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST
1130.8F
Encl:
(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 01667-02
the applicant was authorized to enlist as an
Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).
1.
and reference (a),
E-3 by the Enlisted Community Manager.
served on active duty,
service he decided to separate.
he was authorized to enlist in his old rating (OS), but the ECM
authorized him to come back in the
initial active duty service date was adjusted while he was away
from the Navy.
We cannot reinstate his old time in rate.
but at the end of his active obligated
Per enclosure (1)
SNM is a Navy Veteran who
When he returned to active duty
paygrade of E-3 only.
His
This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for
2 .
Correction of Naval Records only.
Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02275-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. When he returned to active duty, SNM is a Navy Veteran who Per enclosure (1) His This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02472-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06127-02
A three-member p session, considered your injustice were reviewed in to the proceedings of this your application, together opinion furnished by NA copy of which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and RUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6197 of 4 October 2002, a In addition, the Board considered the advisory n of the entire record, the Board found that the cient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04122-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 133 Ser of which is attached. Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02240-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01203-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. administiative regulations and procedures applicable to the In addition, the Board considered the advisory NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6064 of 23 April 2002, a After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02389-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per enclosure (1) paygrade determination was initially made the This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01400-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by of which is attached. Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07656-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.