NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01325-02
During processing his recruiter told him that he would (E-3) and be immediately e. Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps for 4 years of active duty on 28 August 2000 under the provisions of the Prior Service Enlisted Program (PSEP) and was given a date of rank of 2 June 1997 as a lance corporal, (E-3). paygrade E-4 until he met the 6 months active duty CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, notwithstanding the comments contained in enclosure Board finds...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01333-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01334-02
1552 (1) Approved findings, conclusions and recommendations of BCNR, less enclosures From To: Ref: Encl: In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of ‘ Naval Records has 1. reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the sul>ject. The Regulations approved by the Secretary of the Navy, require that the naval record of subject to be corrected, where appropriate, in accordance with the approved recommendation of the Board as contained in enclosure (1). ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01338-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Silberman, Shy, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01339-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative procedures.applicable to the proceedings of this regulations and Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Board found these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your admission to participating in homosexual...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01348-02
observed" fitness report for the period 20 December 1991 to 29 February 1992 states that Petitioner had been released from active duty following failure of selection to MAJ. physical examination on 10 March 1992 stated that Petitioner was physically qualifieefor separation, and the PEB had approved A report of A "not 6 In the report of medical history completed by that his discharge due to vascular headaches and left shoulder instability. investigation, and since more than adequate time to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01350-02
Consequently, he was never given the His detaching fitness report was below d. If a response to the adverse fitness report had been on file when the promotion board first reviewed his records for consideration for promotion to gunnery sergeant in CY 2000 his comments and the fitness report would have been reviewed at the same time, enclosure (2). g- The CY 2001 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board convened on 24 April 2001, prior to the date that the Performance Evaluation Review Board reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01352-02
You requested the correction of three alleged errors in your medical board report. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 August 2002. In this regard, it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01354-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01356-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 REVIEW OF N A V A L KE('0KI) - -- Ref': (a) Title 10 IJ.S.('. the Roml finds t l i t s existc~ict' of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. of tlie Roitrcl for Correction of Nitval Ikcords (32 Code of Federal Kegulations, Section 723.h(e)) and having assured co~npliancr with its provisions, it is liewhy announced that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01365-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was authorized an extension of the one year period in which to ship his household goods Fleet Reserve on 31 March 2000. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01371-02
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 1371-02 14 March 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Mackey, and Geisler, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and i~i.justice on 12 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01373-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together'with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record *and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. regard, the record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01374-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC1:yr.j Docket No: 1374-02 0 July 2002 is After careful evidence injustice. Extraordinary Heroism was sent to the Secretary of the Navy (board of Decorations and Medals) on 08 May 02. request was returned with the board recommendation that a request for determination of NOT BE accorded the. the Navy Pcrsonrzal the Navy approves the recommendation of the e-F.---__._ -.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01376-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC 1741 MMSR-6 of 27 March 2002, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01386-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your request was granted and, as a result of this court- Prior to You received the other than honorable In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, and the contention that alcohol abuse caused your misconduct. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01388-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 REVIEW OF N A V A I . tlie of't'ice having cognizance over the subject ~natter atltlressed in Petitioner's al~plicatiori has com~nentetl to the effect that tlie request has merit and warrants ti~voral,le action. 'That a copy of this Report ot' I'roceedings be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01391-02
Docket No:' 139 1-02 I . The reenlistliient cxcc~~tctl o11 or ahout 3 I Octolwr I999 is f.or ;I let-111 ot' h years, vice 5 years. This change will ent~tlc petitioner to an incsc;twl ;11liol111t of' /one " A " Sl<13.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01395-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01400-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by of which is attached. Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01412-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01419-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case (3) Subject's naval record Summary Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting-that her record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-2 reenlistment code assigned on 5 January 2001. Therefore, the Board concludes that the Rather than change the reenlistment code as an exception to policy, the Board believes that the best way to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01421-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for serious offenses, and the prior unauthorized absences of more than a month. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01424-02
Your request to remove the concurrent fitness report for 27 September 2000 to 11 April 2001 was not considered, as the Navy Personnel Command record, to get the regular reporting senior’s signature on the report and his endorsement on ’ your rebuttal. member ’s statement and the reporting senior for the report ending 11 April 2001. A fitness report does not have to be consistent g. Lieuten m his previous provided several letters of support and one fro reporting senior.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01425-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01426-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Los Angeles, CA (dependent location) vice New Orleans, LA (new duty station).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01427-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 1427-02 14 March 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy I----- - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Mackey, and Geisler, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and i~ijustice on 12 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01429-02
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 1429-02 30 April 02 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Milner, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and illjustice on 30 April 02 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01430-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. request for discharge was granted and your commanding officer was As a result of directed to issue you an undesirable discharge. extended to you when your request for discharge to avoid trial by court-martial was approved since, by this action, you escaped the possibility of confinement at...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01431-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals reviewed Mr. -petition for a Purple Heart.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01433-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary materi'al considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. of 4.0 in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01439-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01444-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01447-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You have submitted documentation showing that your knee You state that the commanding officer agreed with You believe an The Board noted that there is no documentation in the record to support your contentions concerning the nonjudicial punishment and the punishment imposed. punishment, for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01449-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY )ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS NAVY WASHINGTON DC 2 ANNEX 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 1449-02 22 Janaury 2003 From To: : Chairman, Board Secretary of the p r Correction of Naval Records (Y Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S. 1552 (1) DD Form (2) Series of (3) Subject’s 14’ Dot nav N/attachments nents record 1. Pursuant to the provis thj filed enclosure (1) with corrected to Enlistment Ba 1s of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01450-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2002. The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 24 July 1969 to 4 June 1970, when you were discharged under honorable condition by reason of unsuitability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01451-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2002. You were considered physically qualified for separation on 19 November 1959, and you were honorably discharged by reason of unsuitability on that date. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01454-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by COMNAVRESFOR memorandum ‘5420 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01458-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01461-02
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 00 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1461-02 30 April 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 1J.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01462-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01467-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in the ratelgrade of E031E4 vice EOCNlE3. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Kastner, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01469-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a voluntary separation and corresponding Separation Program Designator (SPD), code vice the involuntary separation and SPD code now of record. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01474-02
vicissitudes of military life, hence his re-enlistment code should not be changed. Additionally, he has You essentially contend in your rebuttal to the advisory opinion, recently married with a stepdaughter and that you were immature, You point out that you performed your under considerable stress. the other hand, the patient ’s medical record documents a history of “on and off,” or chronic, suicidality, which started apparently started at age 15, a domestic altercation, poor adaptation to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01475-02
Petitioner was released from active (LPH- f. Reference (b) requires the issuance of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who have completed their enlistment and are serving in paygrades E-l or E-2 at the time of their release from active duty. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing assigned on 30 December 1993, to the RE-4 reenlistment code, 6, and that his date of separation be changed from 30 December 1993 to 20 January 1994. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01476-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You On 24 January 2001 your commanding officer forwarded the separation action, to the discharge authority. supported the RE-4 reenlistment code due to your failure to adapt to the Marine Corps.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01485-02
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed. Although the Board does not condone Based on the foregoing, and considering the fact Petitioner has suffered the consequences of a BCD for nearly 60 years, the Board concludes that no useful purpose is served by continuing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01487-02
paygrade E-4, was awarded reduction to paygrade E-3, forfeiture of $600.00 pay per month for 2 The NJP authority suspended Enclosure (1) pertains. Based on the documentary evidence Moreover, Similarly, Petitioner was informed the NJP proceeding was conducted Petitioner makes no claim that her request for If Petitioner truly believed she was not guilty r-ights to which she was Petitioner was advised of her right to counsel provided by Petitioner, properly and Petitioner received all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01492-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 14 September 1963 for four years at age 17. However, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01501-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board rejected your contentions to the effect that you resumed drinking alcoholic beverages because you were erroneously directed to stop taking your antidepressant medication, and that your command decided to “get rid of” you for misconduct because they were precluded from separating you...