Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01722-02
Original file (01722-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

S

MEH:ddj
Docket No:  
1 October 2002

17X-02

.

 

record\pursuant to the

I October 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered   your application on  
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 8 1  
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

I/ 107 of 16 April 2002, a copy of which is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

38055-0000

WIVY  
YILLIWQTOW  TN 

S720  

PLRSOWNEL  COMMAND

INTEQRITY  DRIVE

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

Ref:

(a) 

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd 25 Nov 01

I
:9

Encl:

(1) BCNR File Number 0226

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of the

The petitioner was discharged in 

2.
ineligible for broken service SRB.

paygrade  E-3 making him

In view of the above,

3.
be disapproved.

recommend the petitioner's request

This is an advisory memorandum to reference  

4.
Board for Correction of Naval Records  
is returned.

(BCNR) only.

(a) for use by the

Enclosure (1)

Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05362-02

    Original file (05362-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting session, considered your application oil were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05241-02

    Original file (05241-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. zone the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01980-02

    Original file (01980-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05178-02

    Original file (05178-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 5 178-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. The petitioner discharged paygrade was E-5. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08203-02

    Original file (08203-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner was discharged from the Navy on 08 October 1993 after serving 2 years 08 months and 21 days of active service.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06174-02

    Original file (06174-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 5he Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08976-02

    Original file (08976-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In petitioner's request. response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the ‘B" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner reenlisted on 05 May 2002 for six years and 2. received a zone petitioner's EAOS at the time was 04 August 2002. reenlisted prior to transfer to NAVSUPPACT SOUDA BAY GR UIC Reference Location Selective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06028-01

    Original file (06028-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04790-01

    Original file (04790-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01976-02

    Original file (01976-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...