Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01583-02
Original file (01583-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 1583-02
5 November 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 5 November 2002.
Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by Memorandum 5420 Pers 40CC of undated, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

5420
PERS 40CC

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Assistant for Board for Correction of Naval Records
Matters (Pers-OOZCB)

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR) INQUIRY ICO

"&

is requesting that he credited back 15 days of
leave used during PCS transfer from USS SAM HOUSTON (SSN-609) to
COMSUBPAC and another 15 days of leave used during PCS transfer
from COMSUBPAC to USS KAMEHAMEHA (SSN-642) BLUE CREW.

Background

:

reported aboard SSN-609 24 May 87, transferred on
COMSUBPAC located in Pearl Harbor, HI, reported
aboard COMSUBPAC 25 Mar 91 and transferred on 1 Mar 94 to  
642 BLUE CREW in Pearl Harbor, HI.

SSN-

states that he was told by his Detailer he would be

authorized a trip to his home of record and 15 days of non-
chargeable leave upon each transfer.
-
In accordance with Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR)
U7200, members are entitled to consecutive overseas tour (COT)
travel not to exceed distance to home-of-record for completing
back-to-back DOD tours.

:

Recommendation
This office recommends denial of YNC
entitlement exists authorizing 15 days of non-chargeable leave
and a flight to home of record upon transferring to serve  
to-back overseas tours. Additionally, Title 28, United States
Code, section 2401 states action commenced against the United
States shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six
years after the right of action first accrues.

request. No

back-

Point of   Contact :

-

DSN: 882-3550  or Coml: (901) 874-3550.

Enlisted Assignment Division



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05123-03

    Original file (05123-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, Executive Direc Enclosure ERS 40CC !h 2 4 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01354-04

    Original file (01354-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Via: Assistant for Board for Correction of Naval Records Matters (Pers-OOZCB)

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09351-06

    Original file (09351-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s entitlement to Consecutive Overseas Travel (COT) was deferred.2. The Board, consisting of Ivins, Neuschafer, and Ms Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00716

    Original file (ND99-00716.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    TWO MONTHS HAD PAST SINCE THE DEPLOYMENT OF THE USS RUEBEN JAMES, MY WIFE AND I HAD RECEIVED OUR FIRST BORN PLUS STILL WORKING ON IMPROVING OUR MARRIAGE SINCE I WAS HOME, WHILE DURING THIS TIME SUDDENLY THE ADMIRAL FROM THE BASE (PEARL HARBOR HAWAII) HAD SENT ORDERS FOR ME TO BE SENT ON DEPLOYMENT WITH THE USS INGERSOLL ON A SIX (6) MONTH DEPLOYMENT. THE PSYCHIATRIST HAD SEEN ME TWICE AND RECOMMENED TO THE ADMIRAL OF THE BASE THAT I WAS NOT FIT FOR DEPLOYMENT SO FROM THIS RECOMMENDATION I...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00729

    Original file (ND03-00729.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “On behalf of the above referenced applicant, and in accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166; SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the following informal comments; and/or issue(s). Evaluation done by Dr. N_ who recommended pt be administratively separated from the Navy. It is possible that due to her adjustment disorder or depressive disorder NOS triggered by occupational stress, that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06273-98

    Original file (06273-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07871 11

    Original file (07871 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 Lee Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner is reimbursed for the cost of his travel to Pearl Harbor, HI. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05810-01

    Original file (05810-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to receive credit for nine (9) days travel time when she traveled her last ship, USS Port Royal, homeported in Pearl Harbor, to New Port, Rhode Island for separation processing. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Pfeiffer, and Taylor, reviewed...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700221

    Original file (ND0700221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the Applicant’s discharge and characterization of his service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, including the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20020043 - 20020514Active: Period of Service...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2008-204

    Original file (2008-204.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated October 22, 2009, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant1 asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he was awarded a Purple Heart for an injury he received when his ship, the USS CAVALIER, was torpedoed by a Japanese submarine on January 30, 1945. 2007-032, in which the Board ordered the Coast Guard to review the applicant’s record to determine whether he was entitled to a Purple Heart Medal...