DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH: ddj
Docket No: 1672-02
13 November 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
o,n 13 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 8 1
attached.
l/ 144 of 9 May 2002, a copy of which is
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE
PERSONNLL COMMAND
DRIVI
TN 2805 5-0000
YILLIWDTON
NAW
NAW
5720
lITEQUITY
1160
Ser
811/
\yq
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref:
(a)
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 29
Dee 01
Encl:
(1) BCNR File Number 0267
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval of the
There is not any way to foretell what future NAVADMINS will
2.
contain, and there is no grandfathering of SRB.
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
(1)
3.
Board for Correction of Naval Re
is returned.
Enclosure
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01762-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 SER 81 attached. Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAW PLRSOWWEL COMMAND 5720 IMTEDRITY DRIVE YILL1110T011 TN 38055-0000 116 0 Ser 811/ MAY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05241-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. zone the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08756-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted on 02 January 2001 for four "C" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner received 47 months...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04056-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the extension agreement of 13 December 2001 and allow his OTEIP extension to June 2002 be established.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06029-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner has received the benefits of the extension by accepting the PCS orders and completing the transfer to the new command. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the 3. use by the Board for correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08590-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (c), sailor may reenlist anytime within the same fiscal year The petitioner's EAOS is 17 May 2003, which is in the Per In view of the above, recommend the petitioner record remain as 2. is. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08203-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner was discharged from the Navy on 08 October 1993 after serving 2 years 08 months and 21 days of active service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07925-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment of 29 January 2002. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.