DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 1527-01
9 April 2001
Your allegations of error and
Dear-
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 April 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 28 May
1974 and reported to active duty on the same day.
reflects that you received three nonjudicial punishments and were
convicted by two summary courts-martial.
The offenses included
unauthorized absences of more than seven days, possession of
13/
marijuana, absence from your appointed place of duty on
occasions, failure to obey a lawful order, dereliction of duty,
and sleeping on watch.
On 18 September 1975 the commanding officer recommended that you
be separated with a general discharge by reason of unfitness.
you elected to waive the
When informed of the recommendation,
right to present your case to an administrative discharge board.
After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for
separation was approved and you were discharged with a general
discharge on 6 October 1975.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
The record
In this regard, individuals discharged by reason
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge,
given your record of frequent involvement with military
The Board especially noted the fact that you were
authorities.
the subject of five disciplinary actions within a period of less
than two years.
Therefore,
of unfitness often received undesirable discharges.
the Board concluded that you were fortunate to receive a general
The
discharge.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03286-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, advisory opinion, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 17 December 1973 at age 17 with parental...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06969-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05656-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 January 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice . Cofisequently, wher applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden, is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00032-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. June 1975 the discharge authority approved the recommendation of your commanding officer that you be issued a general discharge. Accordingly, you were fortunate to have a general The Board concluded that the general...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04200-01
_ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01416-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 2 November 1972 at age 19. However, during the period from 2 January 1974...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02989-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03856-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. to waive your right to present your case to an administrative discharge board, provided you were recommended for a general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03189-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 January 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 09051-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Boardfoundthe evidence submitted was insucifficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Yours theenter the Navy at age 17. However, on 5 November 1975 you received another NJP for two UA’s...