Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01599-02
Original file (01599-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV

Y

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 1599-02
13 November 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 13 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81  
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

l/148 of 14 May 2002, a copy of which is

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

WAW  

PLRSOWWEL  COMMAND

5720 

IMTEDRITY  

DRIVE

YILl.IwDTow  

TN 

28055-0000

116 0
Ser 
811//L@
14 May   200 2

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Ref:

SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 17 Jan 02

(a) 
(b) NAVADMIN 
(c) NAVADMIN 

049/01
336/01

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the

1.
petitioner's request.

a.

The petitioner reenlisted on 18 December 2001 for four

years to continue active service.
SRB entitlement for the  
petitioner's reenlistment..

MS(OOO0) rate at the time of the

Reference (b) did not list a

b.

Reference 

(c) released on 21 December 2001 with an

effective date of 01 January 2002 listed a zone  
entitlement for the  

MS(OOO0) rate.

"B" SRB

C .

The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment date

of 18 December 2001 to reflect 01 January 2002 and receive the
zone 

"B" SRB entitlement offered in reference (c).

d.

Navy Personnel Command/OPNAV cannot provide information

pertaining to subsequent SRB  
has been released.
counseled concerning reference  
(c) prior to the reenlistment.
The petitioner's hindsight is not sufficient grounds to change
the reenlistment as no error or injustice was committed.

NAVADMIN's until after the NAVADMIN
Therefore, the petitioner could not have been

In view of the above, recommend the petitioner's record

2.
remain as is.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use

3.
by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
Enclosure (1) is returned.

CM(S

Head,
Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05241-02

    Original file (05241-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. zone the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03241-02

    Original file (03241-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, on the applicant to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, demonstrate the existence of probable material error or the burden is in.justice. SRB entitlement for the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03265-02

    Original file (03265-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:mh Docket No: 9 July 2002 326542 This is in reference to provisions of title 10 of the lJnited States ( ‘ode. section 01‘ your 1552. your application for correction naval record pursuant to the (lorrcction of Naval Bo;ml al~l~lication for Kecords, sitting in executive 011 9 July 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the session, considered...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04056-02

    Original file (04056-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the extension agreement of 13 December 2001 and allow his OTEIP extension to June 2002 be established.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-02

    Original file (06342-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03215-02

    Original file (03215-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. This was more than a month after you had reenlisted. 2. reenlistment date of 13 August 1999 to 04 October 1999 for four years.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02164-01

    Original file (02164-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 PERS-815 dated 11 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment date of 23 February 2001 to reflect 02 April 2001 and receive the zone B" SRB entitlement in reference (c).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02379-01

    Original file (02379-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. "A" SRB entitlement for the petitioner reenlisted, available for the SRB entitlement. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. bv the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07306-02

    Original file (07306-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. change will give the member an EAOS of 27 September 2003. recommend the petitioner's enlistment This Additionally, this change will allow the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08976-02

    Original file (08976-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In petitioner's request. response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the ‘B" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner reenlisted on 05 May 2002 for six years and 2. received a zone petitioner's EAOS at the time was 04 August 2002. reenlisted prior to transfer to NAVSUPPACT SOUDA BAY GR UIC Reference Location Selective...