DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Y
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
WMP
Docket No:
17 May 2002
1703-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 May 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application,
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
together with all material submitted in
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 28 August 2000
for four years at age 17.
initial entry drug screening urinalysis tested positive for
marijuana.
On 6 September 2000, the results your
On 8 September 2000 you were notified that separation action was
being initiated by reason of defective enlistment and induction
due to erroneous enlistment,
urinalysis for marijuana.
your procedural rights,
of documents concerning the proposed separation.
September 2000 the separation was approved.
On 15 September
2000 you received an uncharacterized entry level separation by
reason of erroneous entry due to drug abuse, and you were
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
with the exception of obtaining copies
as evidenced by the positive
You were advised of and waived all of
On 12
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
to an individual separated by reason of erroneous enlistment due
to drug abuse.
properly assigned since you were appropriately separated due to
the urinalysis that showed pre-service drug use.
Accordingly,
your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Therefore, the RE-4 reenlistment code was
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
You are entitled to have
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon
submission,of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
it is important to keep in mind that
In this regard,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01284-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. as evidenced by the positive You were advised of and waived all of and you were assigned an RE-4 On 17 May 2000 you the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code Regulations require to an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00069-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3J reenlistment code when an individual in an entry level status tests positive for marijuana use, served less than 30 days in the DEP, confessed to the use of marijuana during the moment of truth, and was processed for separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02298-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. You were so discharged on 15 September 1999 and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05792-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03447-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant t demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00967-01
be separated and requested retention in the Navy. On 22 September 2000 the separation authority directed an entry level separation and you were so separated on that same day. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06992-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06264-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06262-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2001. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02781-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...