DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 1689-02
19 December 2002
referent
This is in
pursue
naval record
States Code,
Sectic
A three-member pane
Records, sitting ir
application on 17
C
injustice were
revi
regulations and prc
Board.
Documentary
your application, t
thereof, your naval
and policies.
After careful and c
record, the Board f
insufficient to est
error or injustice.
The Board found tha
The record reflects
and were convicted
included unauthorin
plac
your appointed
lawful order, and
II
marijuana use
durir
action was taken
as
On 9 September 1985
be separated with a
misconduct due to c
of the recommendati
your case to an
adx
the discharge
author
approved and you we
than honorable disc
yo
In its review of
18, United
application for correction of your
provisions of Title
to your
t to the
1552.
of the Board for Correction of Naval
executive session, considered your
cember 2002.
Your allegations of error and
wed in accordance with administrative
edures applicable to the proceedings of this
material considered by the Board consisted of
gether with all material submitted in support
record and applicable statutes, regulations
nscientious consideration of the entire
und that the evidence submitted was
blish the existence of probable material
The offenses
you enlisted in the Navy on 7 December 1982.
that you received two nonjudicial punishments
y a summary court-martial.
3 absences totalling 20 days, absence from
of duty on two occasions, failure to obey a
ssing movement.
You also tested positive for
a urinalysis, but apparently no disciplinary
3 result of this offense.
the commanding officer recommended that you
other than honorable discharge by reason of
mission of a serious offense.
When informed
n, you elected to waive the right to present
nistrative discharge board.
After review by
ity, the recommendation for separation was
3 discharged on 4 October 1985 with an other
3rge.
c application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitiga
and good postservic
these factors were
of your discharge,
serious nature of
period of unautho
Therefore, the Boar
warranted.
names and vo
upon request.
It is regret
favorable ac
recons
Board
evidence or other
In this regard, it
presumption
Consequently, when
record, the burden
existence of proba
such as your youth and immaturity
However, the Board concluded that
ot sufficient to warrant recharacterization
iven the frequency of your offenses, and the
e of your misconduct, especially the lengthy
missing movement and drug abuse.
concluded that no change to the discharge is
pplication has been denied.
The
of the panel will be furnished
n
the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
submission of new and material
iously considered by the Board.
o keep in mind that a
s to all official records.
correction of an official naval
s on the applicant to demonstrate the
e material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06854-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07253-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2002. However, on 18 January 1985, the discharge authority directed your commanding officer to administratively reprocess you for separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and commission of a serious offense, and to afford you the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB). On 4 March 1985 an ADB recommended you be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06278-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2003. The letter of 27 March 1986 that notified you that the request was denied stated that your "statements clearly demonstrate that your request for discharge (was) based on dissatisfaction with the naval service and not by reason of conscientious objector beliefs." Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06070-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 26 March 1996, this Board denied your requests for further recharacterization of your service, and changes in your narrative reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02305-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The CO of the DETROIT responded that when you reported on board the RTC letter of 2 June 1986 was noted in your service record, but the ship was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06700-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 25 February 1993 you received your fourth NJP for absence from your appointed place of duty and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05144-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 4 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The punishment imposed was forfeitures of $100 per month On 30 January 1986 The Your record further shows that you received NJP for 21 days of unauthorized absence from 4 to 25 March 1986 and missing ship's movement. 1986 NMPC approved...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07447-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that a record which includes five nonjudicial punishments and the final adverse performance evaluation was sufficient to support the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08197-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03812-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, the Board noted that you were the subject of five disciplinary actions and two civil convictions within a period of less than three years.