NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01372-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 July 2001. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that the diagnosed made in your case and your discharge from the Marine Corps were erroneous, and that you were unfit by reason of physical disability incurred in or aggravated by your service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01378-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. 1973 you were convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of a 75 day period of UA and were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for two months and a $400 forfeiture of pay. discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01379-01
The NDRB essentially found that given the nature Discharge Review Board of your offenses and your excellent post service conduct, a discharge under other than honorable conditions was no longer appropriate. such as your youth and desire for However, the Board Concerning your request for a change in the reenlistment code, the Board noted that regulations require the assignment of an 4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01382-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01386-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found the evidence and materials submitted were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01387-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1387-01 17 April 2001 From: To: Subj : Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) (1) (2) (3) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01388-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1100 RE-13 of 10 ApriL 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01394-01
Your record reflects that you served for a nearly a The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 27 August 1979 at the age of 18. year without disciplinary incident but on 8 August 1980 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a seven day period of unauthorized absence (UA) and were awarded a $253 forfeiture of On 22 March 1981 and again on 9 pay and a reduction in rate. On 9 August 1983 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01396-00
D.C. 20350-200 NAV Y S 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 Ser 14 June 2000 N130D/ OuO329 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (Pers-OOZCB) Ref: (a) DODINST 1304.22 Encl: (1) BCNR File #01396-00 with microfiche service record The following p.rovides comment and recommendation on former 1. Petty Officer initial enlistment into the Navy was ay she signed an agreement and 3. on 1 June 1987. statement of understanding that by electing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01396-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "C" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Mr. Leeman, Ms. McCormick, and Ms. Wiley , reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01398-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01399-01
material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, copies of which are enclosed. You also received The Board believed that even The Accordingly, your application has been denied. VIRGINIA 22 134-5 103 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS CASE OF...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01401-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 24 August 1943 and reported to active duty on 23 November 1943. entered a program which, if successfully completed, would have led to a commission in the Navy. There is no evidence in the record, to show that you requested or were promised a commission in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01405-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your conviction by civil authorities of murder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01407-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01408-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (a) requested comments and recommendations in subject member's case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01411-00
doctor placed you in a temporary status of not physically qualified from status after that date. concluded that your medical history was sufficient to support a decision that you should not be reenlisted in the Naval Reserve. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01412-01
1552 SECNAVINST 1910.4B DD Form 149 with attachments Case Summary Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. reference states that individuals separated for homosexuality will receive...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01413-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), commissioned officer in the United States Marine filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by moving two retirement points from one anniversary year to another. Retirement Credit Report (CRCR) shows that as of the end of the anniversary year on 25 February 2001, he has been credited with 16 years of qualifying service for reserve retirement. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01414-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by showing that he was not discharged from the Marine Corps Reserve on 12 October 2000, but was transferred to the Reserve Retired List on 1 October 2000. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer and Silberman and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 June...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01416-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01420-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2001. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 October 1988. separation physical examination on 3 June 1992. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01431-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were discharged on 19 February 1999, by reason of a condition, not a disability, interfering with your performance of duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01432-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered its previous action of granting relief to the USUHS students in the Class of 1986 and those student accepting a scholarship in the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program who graduated from medical school in 1986 and concluded that the unique...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01436-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01439-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. court- martial (SPCM) of disobedience and a day of unauthorized absence (UA) month, a $50 forfeiture of pay, - You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01440-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 1440-01 11 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: Encl: FORMER REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01445-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary action, and since your conduct and proficiency averages were insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable In this regard, there is no evidence of any medical discharge. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01446-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. on 29 March 1992 and rated his condition...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01450-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S a . The court sentenced him to a f. Subsequently Petitioner was processed for an administrative discharge based on his conviction by civil On 25 February 1955 the discharge authority authorities. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's b. naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01457-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01462-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 1462-01 19 July 2001 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF - (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr.Brezna, Mr. Dunn and Mr. 2. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01464-01
You requested that your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01465-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Bartlett, and Mimer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01481-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in of college credit hours. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Taylor, Dunn, and Ms. Hardbower, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01483-01
period from 20 December 1958 to 28 January 1965 you were a member of the Marine Corps Reserve and earned about four years and six months of qualifying service for reserve retirement. Therefore, the Board substantially T.he Board also considered whether your record could or should be corrected to show that you are eligible for reserve retirement and retired pay at age 60. retirement, an individual must have 20 years of qualifying service and the last eight years must be in the reserve...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01484-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01491-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2001. !‘I FIB MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: ( ‘ Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR AP SERGE N THE CASE OF USMCR (a) (b) Sergea MC0 P1610.7D DD Form 149 of 13 w/Ch l-5 Ott 00 Per MC0 met on 21 February 2001 to consider 1610.11C, the Performance Evaluation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01501-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The member requests the removal of his fitness report for the period 1 January 1985 to 28 February 1986 and to file the member senior’s endorsement to his fitness report for the period 1 October 1998 to 31 May 1999. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01502-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the characterization of his discharge be changed. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was honorably discharged on 18 February 1970 vice issued a general discharge on the same day. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01505-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 12 June 2001 1505-01 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01506-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show automatic advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01509-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER which is attached. D.C. 20350-200 N 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 7220 Ser 9 May 2001 N130C/oiu0195 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01519-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01523-01
However, the Board has also been provided with a Reserve Retirement Master Control Card which shows that Petitioner has been credited with 19 years, 10 months and 21 days of service for reserve retirement. concludes that the record should be corrected to show that he has 20 years of qualifying service for reserve retirement. further concludes that the best way to accomplish this action is to transfer 35 retirement points from the excess over 50 in Therefore, the Board The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01524-01
reques:ed removal of your failure of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session? opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 April attached. Enclosure (1) is returned, recommending disapproval of request to backdate his date of rank.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01528-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2001. Based on our review of the material provided, we find the following: a. Nothing provided in the member petition demonstrates that the reporting senior acted improperly, violated requirements, or that he abused his discretionary authority in evaluating the member ’s performance.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01529-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 1 July 200 1. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01530-01
Zsalman reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the Documentary material considered by available evidence of record. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board's finding is based on Petitioner's documented hardship, the relatively minor nature of his misconduct, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01532-00
an ADB recommended you be issued an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct. discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.