Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01412-01
Original file (01412-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370.5100

TJR
Docket No: 1412-01
5 July 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the  Navy

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

::;

(1)
(2)
(3)

CORD OF

10 U.S.C. 1552
SECNAVINST 

1910.4B

DD Form 149 with attachments
Case Summary
Subject's naval record

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

1.
former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure
(1) with this Board requesting that his general discharge be
upgraded to an honorable discharge.

The Board, consisting of Ms. Hare, Mr. Harrison, and Mr.

2.
Mazza, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 26 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

Documentary material considered by

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

C .

Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 10 May 1994.

During
his service,
he was not the subject of any disciplinary action.
During the early part of his enlistment his conduct and overall
trait averages under the old performance evaluation system were
both 3.8.
sufficient to warrant a fully honorable characterization of
service under this system.
system, Petitioner received a final overall trait average of
2.81, which exceeded the 2.0 average required for a fully
honorable characterization of service.

Conduct and overall trait averages of 3.0 and 2.8 were

Under the new performance evaluation

d.

On 19  June 1997 Petitioner admitted that he was bisexual
and further stated that he had participated in homosexual acts.
Subsequently, he was processed for an administrative separation
by reason of homosexuality due to his admission.
his procedural rights, on 20 June 1997 the commanding officer
recommended a general discharge.
On 18 July 1997, by message to
Petitioner's command, the separation authority directed discharge
with the characterization to be
review.'!
On 24 July 1997 Petitioner was issued a general discharge by
reason of "homosexual conduct admission."

"based on service record  

After he waived

Reference 

(b) sets forth the policies, standards, and

e.

As it pertains to Petitioner's case, the

procedures for administratively separating enlisted
servicemembers.
reference states that individuals separated for homosexuality
will receive either an honorable or general discharge, based on
his or her total performance of duty and conduct.
regard, the average marks are one factor to be considered, but
they are not determinative.
If an individual's discharge is
deemed warranted, reference (b) states that the separation
authority must assign a characterization of service.

In this

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.

The Board initially notes Petitioner's overall satisfactory
record of service for more than three years, and is especially
aware that he served without any disciplinary infractions and his
average marks were satisfactory to above average.
The Board is
also aware that, in accordance with current regulations, an
individual who is discharged by reason of homosexuality should
receive the characterization of service warranted by his or her
service record.
performance and unblemished record, the Board believes that an
honorable discharge is the characterization warranted by his
service record.
Along these lines, the Board is aware that
Petitioner's final mark averages do not compel an honorable
characterization of service, but also concludes there is no good
reason to depart from the marks in'this case.

Given Petitioner's length of service, good

The Board also tangentially notes that the separation authority
essentially delegated the decision on the characterization of
Petitioner's 
so doing, the separation authority abrogated its responsibility
under reference  
service.

The Board believes that in
(b) to assign the appropriate characterization of

senvice to his command.

Based on the foregoing,
of recharacterization is appropriate.

the Board finds that relief in the form

RECOMMENDATION:

a.

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that

he was issued an honorable
general discharge actually

discharge on 24 July 1997 vice the
issued on that date.

b.

That a copy of this
Petitioner's naval record.

C .

That, upon request,
informed that Petitioner's
on 22 February 2001.

Report of Proceedings be filed in

the Veterans Administration be
application was received by the Board

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

4.
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

;/q*

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

&p
AIAN  
Acting Recorder

Fi-. GOLDSMITH

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
5.
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a),
has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Executiv



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04645-01

    Original file (04645-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, that his naval record be corrected Board requesting, in effect, to show a more favorable type of discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 12 August 1968. Based upon Petitioner's overall record of service and 2 current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference (b) and its radical departure from the policy which was in effect on 12 August 1968, the date of Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1207 14

    Original file (NR1207 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with-this Board requesting, in effect, that his “GENERAL UNDER HONORBLE - CONDITIONS” characterization of service be changed per reference (b). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman and Exnicios and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04698-09

    Original file (04698-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than a discharge under other than honorable conditions issued on 8 October 1987. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation was modified and Petitioner was discharged with a discharge under other than honorable conditions on 8 October 1987. d. At the time of Petitioner’s discharge character of service for Sailors...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01031-09

    Original file (01031-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51000RS Docket No: 1031-09 3 August 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy subi: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation was approved and Petitioner was discharged with a general discharge on 17 March 1987. d. At the time of Petitioner’s discharge, character of service for Sailor’s not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3836-13

    Original file (NR3836-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his narrative reason for separation, (HOMOSEXUALITY - ENGAGED IN, ATTEMPTED TO ENGAGE IN, OR SOLICITED ANOTHER TO ENGAGE IN HOMOSEXUAL ACTS (sic) OR ACTS) issued on 17 October 1981, be changed. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ivins, Lippolis and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 March 2014 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04362-01

    Original file (04362-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Averages of 3.0 in conduct and 2.7 h. Reference (b) sets forth the Department of the Navy's With regard to and procedures for administratively current policies, standards, separating enlisted service members. the Based on Petitioner's overall record of service and current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference (b) and its radical departure from the policy which was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07086-02

    Original file (07086-02.PDF) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 4 June 1958. f. On 13 May 1958, after Petitioner was advised of administrative separation action and waived her right to an administrative discharge board, recommended that she be separated with an undesirable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07580-06

    Original file (07580-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5109 CRS Docket No: 7580-06 4 February 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FOR}ER 4 | ; REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 (b) SECNAVINST 1910.4B Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record (a), Petitioner 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11857-08

    Original file (11857-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The minimum average marks required for a fully honorable characterization of service were 3.25 in conduct and 2,75 in overall traits on 26 November 1951. e. Reference (b) sets forth the Department of the Navy’s current policies, standards and procedures for administratively separating enlisted service members. Corps officials with the authority to involuntarily separate | those service members who commit a homosexual act or acts. Based upon Petitioner’s overall record of service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05279-07

    Original file (05279-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    -——_—_From:—-Chairman,;- DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5279-07 18 April 2008 To: .Secréetary of the Navy Subj: FORMER