Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01408-01
Original file (01408-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF

THE, NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

 

2  NAVY ANNE
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

X

0

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 1408-01
30 May 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1830 PERS 823 of 1 May 2001, a copy of which is
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

entire record, the Board found that the
After careful and conscientious consideration of the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or 

:l.njustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL   COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN  

3805Ei-0000

1830
Pers823
Ser 093
1 May 01

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ICO

Ref:

ltr of 4 Apr 2001

(a) Pers-OOXCB 
(b)
(c)
(d)

10 U.S.C.
10 U.S.C.
10 U.S.C.

1201
6330
6326

Encl:

(1) BCNR File with Microfiche Service Record

1. Reference (a) requested comments and recommendations in
subject member's case.
correction to his statement of service and retired pay account
to include credit for constructive service.

Petitioner requests

Specifically,

Petty Office

was transferred from active duty to the

2.
Temporary Disability Retired List on 14 Feb 1981 and later
transferred to the Permanent Disability Retired List on 14 Feb
1986.
constructive service credit is only authorized for personnel who
are transferred to the Fleet Reserve or the Retired List under
the provisions of reference (c) and (d).

(b) through (d) indicate that

Review of references  

3.Based  on paragraph 2 above,
Officer

petition be denied.

it is recommended that Petty

Enclosure (1) is returned.

tirements Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03604-01

    Original file (03604-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a) requested comments and recommendations in Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08517-00

    Original file (08517-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 25 September 2001 8517-00 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application injustice were reviewed in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9806586

    Original file (NC9806586.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subject member petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and or remove injustices in the service record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06586-98

    Original file (06586-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WAVY P E R I O W W U C O Y Y A N D 5720 IWTE9RWY DRIVE MILLIWOTON I N 38055-0000 1830 Pers823 Ser 45 1 1 Jun 1999 Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO - Ref: (a) Pers-OOXCB ltr of 3 1 March 1999 NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File with Microfiche Service Record MEMORANDUM...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05099-01

    Original file (05099-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this record be corrected to show transfer Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA), vice discharge with medical severance pay, and further corrected to show enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). and consideration of ‘ ail the evidence of record, (2), the Board finds the existence of an and especially in light of il?justice warranting the the RECOMMENDATION: That Subject’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Docket No:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07218-98

    Original file (07218-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. His case may be reviewed for possible advancement to his highest enlisted grade held, based on the provisions of 10 USC 6334, when he is eligible to be transferred to the Retired List at the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01080-01

    Original file (01080-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Retirement Multiplier is 55 % . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Kastner, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05776-01

    Original file (05776-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. should have received a Chief Petty Office counting Service-Cleveland letter from the Defense Fi (DFAS-CL) within one month after he retired,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08029-00

    Original file (08029-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. 2. certain criteria are entitled to constructive credit. 6 months and 9 days of active duty and was not entitled to Enclosure (1) shows member only completed 19 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02615-98

    Original file (02615-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. retirement date not be never denied leave.