DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX .
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj
Docket No: 1519-01
12 June 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 10 May 2001, a copy of which
is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
WAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TNH 38055-0000
1160
PERS-815
10 May O1
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via: PERS-00ZCB
Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO gigiemmsgets
439-43-9007 —_
Ref: (a) SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 13 Feb 01
(6b) NAVADMIN 122/95
(c) NAVADMIN 308/95
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the
petitioner's request.
a. The petitioner reenlisted on 14 December 1995 for six
years after completion on NEC 1119 “Cc” school training. The
petitioner received a zone “B” SRB entitlement for the FC(1119)
rate/NEC at the time of reenlistment. Reference (b) listed the
zone “B” entitlement for the FC(1119) rate/NEC at award level
LQ.
b. Reference (c), released on 18 December 1995 with an
effective date of 01 February 1996 increased the award level for
the FC(1119) rate/NEC to 2.0 vice 1.0.
c. The petitioner requests to cancel the reenlistment date
of 14 December 1996 and effect a reenlistment in February 1996
2000 to receive the increased SRB award level entitlement offered
in reference (cc).
d. Navy Personnel Command/OPNAV cannot provide information
pertaining to subsequent SRB NAVADMIN’s until after the NAVADMIN
has been released. Therefore the petitioner could not have been
counseled concerning reference (c) prior to the reenlistment.
The petitioner’s hindsight is not sufficient grounds to expunge
the 14 December 1995 reenlistment as no error or injustice was
committed.
2. In view of the above, recommend the petitioner’s record
remain as is.
Subj: BCNR PETITION ICOR@M#
3. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use
by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
Enclosure (1) is returned. f aia cele
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01
Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08414-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. recommend no change to the The petitioner and received the zone reenlisted on 09 August 1999 for four years "B" SRB maximum of $30K for the FC rate. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02469-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. d. The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340. e. Per reference (c), section (M) note 11, service members must successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill award level. recommend the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00332-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement calculated in reference (c) for the broken-service reenlistment based on the date of discharge. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00896-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. petitioner's Executive Officer denied the request for NEC 2735. reference (c) does not indicate if NEC 2735 was e. PERS-815 does not have the authorization to determine the petitioner's eligibility for NEC 2735 upon the release of reference (b).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03083-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and injustice session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 26 June is attached. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use recommend the petitioner's record In view of the above, only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03281-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL, 5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 1160 PERS-815 26 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Ref: (a)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08169-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend expunging the petitioner's Recommend effecting a This change Subj: BCNR PETITION IC This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03422-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 is attached. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 07 Dec 96 and effect a 7 month extension to his P3D of July 1997.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00280-99
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. servicemembers reenlisting for SRB may receive only However, per - NPC 815 cannot advise petitioner to reenlist at a later date FC(OOO0) rating was "C") because per reference (c), the (for zone not eligible for a zone "C" SRB. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for correction of...