Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01462-01
Original file (01462-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

  RECORD S

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TRG
Docket No: 1462-01
19 July 2001

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF

-

(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

1.
former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure
(1) with this Board requesting that her reenlistment code be
changed.

The Board, consisting of  

Mr.Brezna, Mr. Dunn and Mr.  

2.
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10
July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by

Mackey,

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Although it appears that Petitioner's application was

not filed in a timely manner,
waive the statute of limitations and review the application on
its merits.

it is in the interest of justice to

C .

Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy on 3 April 1989 for

The records shows that she had completed about four

two years.
years of active service on a prior enlistment.
she signed an administrative remarks page (page 13) entry in
which she agreed to incur additional obligated service until
March 1993 in connection with her receipt of transfer orders.
She also acknowledged that if she did not incur the
service, she would be assigned an RE-4 reenlistment

obligated
code.

On 4 January 1991

d.

Petitioner reported aboard the USS GRAPPLE

(ARS 53) on

22 February 1991.
but only for five months and not two years.
discharged on 30 August 1991.
she was being assigned the RE-4 reenlistment code because of her
failure to incur obligated service.

On 2 April 1991 she extended her enlistment,
She was honorably

At that time she acknowledged that

e.

Petitioner states in her application that she desires
change in the reenlistment code so she can enlist in the Naval
Reserve.

a

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
The Board notes that Petitioner was aware of the
action.
requirement to extend her enlistment for two years and she
declined to do so.
allowed to transfer with only about two months of obligated
service remaining and she subsequently was allowed to extend that
enlistment for five months instead of the required two years.
Given the circumstances and her good record, the Board concludes
that no useful purpose is now served by the RE-4 reenlistment
code and it should now be changed to RE-1.

However, the Board also notes that she was

The Board notes that the reenlistment code was proper when it was
assigned and concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be
filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers
will understand the reason for the change in the reenlistment
code.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by issuing a DD
a.
Form 215 to show that on 30 August 1991 she was assigned an RE-1
reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record.

That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's

b.
naval record.

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

4.
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

ALAN E. 
Acting Recorder

GOLDSMI!l!H_

5.

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

2

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a),
has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05382-01

    Original file (05382-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5382-01 14 December 2001 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that her reenlistment code be changed.. "must promote" and She was advanced to YN2 on Her next evaluation report...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06674-01

    Original file (06674-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 2 October 2002 6674-01 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08227-00

    Original file (08227-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval r'tcord From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment assigned on 13 January 1995. c'ode then the RE-4 reenlistment code th'a United States Navy filed enclosure The Board, consisting of Mr. 2. An a'ferage was 3.7, but it does not The page 9 indicates g- Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02277-00

    Original file (02277-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 2277-00 20 February 2001 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD 0 (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Petitioner had been retained on active duty as required by law, Since an she would have completed her service and been retired. This is consistent with the However, the Board notes .that if Board- § 1176 were applicable The Board notes the Therefore,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08485-06

    Original file (08485-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that her reenlistment code be changed.2 Board, consisting of Ms. Ms. and Ms. previewed Petitioner’s allegations error andinjustice on 9 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board further concludes that this Report of proceedings...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09276-07

    Original file (09276-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that her RE-4 reenlistment code be changed and/or that she be reinstated to active duty to qualify for retirement. Given the recommendation for an RE-3T in one of the advisory opinions and considering her excellent performance of duty, the Board concludes that the reenlistment code should now be changed to RE-3T vice the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09410-07

    Original file (09410-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 9410-07 20 February 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ®@ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record : Pursuanr to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a4 former member of the Naval Reserve, filed an application with eh Hoard requesting that his RE 4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06318-01

    Original file (06318-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6318-01 7 December 2001 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that her reenlistment code be changed. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Milner and Pauling 2. reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03838-03

    Original file (03838-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable reenlistment code. rd, consisting of Mr. , reviewed Petitioner's a Mr. error and injustice on 28 October 2003, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00143-10

    Original file (00143-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 00143-10 13 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Cr QR USY, Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a Former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in her RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. ...