Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01388-01
Original file (01388-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX

                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 1388-01
22 May 2001















    This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
    record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code,
    section 1552.

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
    sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May
    2001. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
    accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to
    the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the
    Board consisted of your application, together with all material
    submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
    regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
    opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1100 RE-13 of 10 ApriL 2001, a copy
    of which is attached.

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
    Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish
    the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this
    connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
    contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
    been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
    furnished upon request.

    It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
    favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
    reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or
    other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it
    is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches
    to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of
    an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate
    the existence of probable material error or injustice.

                                                          Sincerely,



                                                          W.   DEAN PFEIFFER
                                                          Executive Director

    Enclosure
                         UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
                       MARINE CORPS RECRUITING COMMAND
      3280 RUSSELL ROAD      IN REPLY REFER TO
      QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103     1100
      RE -13
      10 Apr 01


       MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
                                NAVAL RECORDS

Subj: BCNR DOCKET NO. 01388-01


Ref:  (a) MCO 1130.80

1.    Per the reference all Marines having prior service are considered
prior service Marines. Prior service Marines are first considered for an
FTAP boatspace. If there are no boatspaces the CMC (MMEA-6) will attempt to
allow the Marine the opportunity to come back on active duty under the PSEP
program.

                           PSEP designation and approval was in the
best interest of the Marine Corps.

3.    Point of contact for additional information is GySgt ext DSN
278—9404/5.




                                             ~fficer, MCRC

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06927-07

    Original file (06927-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Incase, this headquarters carefully considered that for him to be competitive for promotion to the next higher grade and furthermore, to have observed time in his new PMOS, that the date of his reenlistment on 29 April 2005 be utilized as his date of rank to sergeant. 6927-07; REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08214-98

    Original file (08214-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00200-02

    Original file (00200-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of tlie Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2002. In atltlirion, the Boartl consicleretl the advisory After careful and conscientious consi(leration of the entire record, tlie Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable ~naterial error or injustice. When he reenlisted back on ac:tive duty he was authorized the rank of Lance Corporal.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05276-03

    Original file (05276-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, Executive Direc Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07185-01

    Original file (07185-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Enclosure (2) is furnished to assist in By enclosure 3. a copy of the Advisory Opinion contained at enclosure (3), this Headquarters provided Majo ith Head, "Performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 1610 MMER/PERB 23 kU6 20% From: Co To: Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) MC0 1610.11C MC 41 Per the reference, the Performance Evaluation Review Board 1. has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05329-01

    Original file (05329-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your last request was not considered, as you have not been selected for or promoted to lieutenant colonel. directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has Date of Report Reportin gSenio r Period of Report 11 Apr 00 There will be inserted in your Naval record a memorandum in 2. Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) to record and e FY02 USMC remove the To He successfully...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04822-99

    Original file (04822-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The adverse letter qualifies as "other reports, or correspondence of a military nature" per paragraph b . d. The adverse letter was the result of a report to CMC Sergean Sergean (MMPR-2) by known by this Divis rebutted by 4. provide advisory opinion and recommendations. the adverse fitness report precipitated the adverse letter.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05749-01

    Original file (05749-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Roartl. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of to the proceedings of this willt your application, together naval record and applicable the advisory opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04755-01

    Original file (04755-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that CMC has corrected your reenlistment code to RE-3C. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04368-01

    Original file (04368-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    request for the By enclosure 3. a copy of the Advisory Opinion contained at (3), this Headquarters provide encl ith Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ,._iDQUARTERS UNITLD STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB 2 1 MAY 2001 From: To: Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) MC0 1610.11C Per the reference, 1. has reviewed allegations of error and...