Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01502-01
Original file (01502-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TJR
Docket No: 1502-01
24 August 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

OF RECORD

10 U.S.C. 1552

(a)
(1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
characterization of his discharge be changed.

The Board, consisting of Messrs. Neuschafer, Pfeiffer, and

2.
Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 22 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed in a

timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
statute of limitations and review the application on its merits.

Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 29 December

196z*at age 19.
66, which placed him in mental group IV.

His general classification test (GCT) score was

1

d.

Petitioner served on active duty for a period of one

During this period Petitioner was not the

month and 20 days.
subject of any disciplinary actions.

e.

On 3 February 1970, after undergoing a medical

examination, Petitioner was recommended for an administrative
separation by reason of unsuitability due to enuresis and
defective attitude.
On 11 February 1970 an aptitude board
recommended a general discharge by reason of unsuitability.

f.

On 18 February 1970, prior to the completion of recruit
training, and in pursuant to the recommendation of an aptitude
board, Petitioner was discharge by reason of unsuitability. In
accordance with directives which were then in effect, Petitioner
was issued a general discharge.

g-

On 29 December 1976 the Secretary of Defense announced a
change in policy and authorized honorable discharges for service
members administratively separated during recruit training
because of marginal performance or minor disciplinary
infractions.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all'the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.

The Board's finding is based on Petitioner's overall record of
military service and particularly the remedial changes in policy
which became effective after his discharge.
Board concludes that relief in the form of recharacterization is
appropriate.

Accordingly, the

In view of the foregoing,
injustice warranting the following corrective action.

the Board finds the existence of an

RECOMMENDATION:

a.

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that

Petitioner was honorably discharged on 18 February 1970 vice
issued a general discharge on the same day.

b.

That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in

Petitioner's naval record.

C .

That, upon request, the Veterans Administration be

informed that Petitioner's application was received by the Board
on 27 February 2001.

2

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

4.
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
5.
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Wb.$.tL
rm 

w, DEAN 
Exelutjve Director

PFEIFFGR



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07498-01

    Original file (07498-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed. The Board's finding is based on Petitioner's overall record of military service and particularly the remedial changes in policy which became effective after his discharge. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was honorably discharged on 25 March 1963 vice...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04808-01

    Original file (04808-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The psychologist also noted that Petitioner suffered from the symptoms of PTSD during his active duty service in Vietnam. is warranted based on Petitioner's length of service, especially his unblemished combat service in Vietnam, PTSD. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, maintained for such purpose, part of Petitioner's naval record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06761-01

    Original file (06761-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 CRS Docket No: 6761-01 10 December 2001 From: To: Subj: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary-of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: Encl: (a) 10 U.S.C. The board recommended discharge. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05402-02

    Original file (05402-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests that the filed enclosure (1) with this that his naval record be corrected 2. CONCLUSION: The Board's finding is based on Petitioner's overall Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial relief. Accordingly, the Board concludes that relief in the form of recharacterization to honorable is appropriate but that the reason for discharge remain unchanged.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03468-01

    Original file (03468-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    3468-01 31 January 2002 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (b) Navy-Marine Corps Awards Manual (1) DD Form (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record 149‘w/attachments I From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, requesting, in effect, show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 19 May 1972 and that he be awarded the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00337-06

    Original file (00337-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed an application with this Board requesting a better characterization of service then the undesirable discharge issued on 30 July 1974.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Mr.and reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice 2 August 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08354-00

    Original file (08354-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 8354-00 3 October 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Shy and allegations of error and injustice on 27 September determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01710-05

    Original file (01710-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 19 July 1963 he was separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of unsuitability.h. However, regulations authorized no less than a general discharge for service members who are separated for this reason.j.The Board is also aware that characterization of service by reason of unsuitability is determined by the member’s military record, proficiency and conduct averages, and information pertaining to the military record.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03161-09

    Original file (03161-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member°of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the general characterization of his discharge on 24, March 1972 be changed. On 21 March 1972 the discharge authority directed separation with a characterization of service warranted by the service record. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2947 13

    Original file (NR2947 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. In the alternative, that his general characterization of service be upgraded to honorable, RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed to RE-1, and receive full involuntary separation pay. Although Petitioner was medically diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, the DD Form 214 erroneously states that he was discharged by reason of a “PERSONALITY DISORDER”.