DEPARTMENT OF
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
THE NAVY
NIiVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHiNGrON DC
20370-5100
HD: hd
Docket No: 01524-01
4 June 2001
Dear- Lieutena
This is in reference to your application for correction of
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested that your
Clctober 2000 to 1 February 2000, to reflect
lieutenant date of rank be changed from 1
selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 00 Line Lieutenant Selection Board, vice the FY 01 Line
Lieutenant Selection Board. You also impliedly
selection by the FY 00 Line Lieutenant Selection Board.
reques:ed removal of your failure of
your naval record pursuant to the
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session? considered your application on 3 1 May 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
the
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material, submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 April
attached. The Board also considered your
ktter dated 17 May 2001 with enclosure.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
2001, a copy of which is
consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
After careful and conscientious
evidence submitted was ‘insufficient to
exi:#tence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion.
estab:iish the
You
The Board noted that you acknowledge you did not send the awards in question by certified
(PERS-
mail, return receipt requested.
85) to verify that the awards had been received, and that unnamed personnel told you that
your record was “complete”; however, you do not
alle;;e that you were specifically told the
re:gard, the Board noted that the Chief of Naval Personnel
awards had been received. In this
letter of 21 March 2000 to you stated
completeness before a promotion selection board.
*assert that in early June 1999, you called NPC
“awards are not required to establish record
”
In view of the above, your application has been denied.
furnish,ed upon request.
members of the panel will be
The. names and votes of the
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the
material evidence or other matter not previously consic.ered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
of’icial naval record, the burden is on the
c.orrection of an
IBoard reconsider
is decision upon submission of new and
injustice.
Sincerely,
XEAN PFEIFFER
W.
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF
THE NAV Y
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
380Es5-0000
5420
PERS-85
23 Apr 01
MEMORANDUM FOR BCNR
Via:
BUPERS/BCNR Coordinator
Subj:
L
,
USN ,
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
1.
Enclosure (1) is returned,
recommending disapproval of
request to backdate his date of rank.
esents no supporting documentation that he
2.
submitted the two awards to the FY-00 Active Duty Lieutenant
Line Promotion Selection Board.
to support his request,
a backdate is not warranted.
As he provides no new evidence
3.
Recommend that
date of rank remain unchanged.
_ ’
Llalson,
Officer Promotions
BCW
and Enlisted Advancements Division
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04613-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 HD: hd Docket No: 04613-01 16 October 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: C D u s REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06189-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command, dated 22 November 2000, 15 February and 11 June 2001, and the Medical Corps Officer Community Manager dated 26 April 2001, copies of which are attached.The Board also considered your counsel’s letters dated 17 April and 18 September 2001. evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, this evidence, by itself, did not establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05081-00
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Active Duty Commander Line Promotion Selection Board acted that material error of fact or material contrary to law, administrative error occurred or that material information was not considered by the promotion selection board. Line Promotion Selection Board specifically directs the board to select officers that are...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00427-01
df an official naval record, the burden is on the Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y NAVY Ml,LLlNGTON TN PERSONNEL.~OMMAND 38OSSOOOO 5720 INTEGRITY brilVE 5420 PERS-85 18 Apr 01 . ?WDUM FOR BCNR Via: Subj: Ref: BUPERS/BCNR Coordinator USNR , (a) USC (b) USC 10 Sec. Lieutenanptoonce placed on the promoted to Lieutenant with'a date of rank of 16 Apr 01 in accorddnce with ref the member is entitled to the grade of TDRL.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05855-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of commander he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 01 Active Duty Line Commander Selection Board, vice the FY 02 Active Duty Line Commander Selection Board. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06208-00
” This report reflects that both the “5.0” (highest), two of “4.0” (second best) “5.0, ” two of “4.0” and two of “3.0”; and it f. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), PERS-311, the Navy Personnel (NPC) office having cognizance over officer fitness reports, stated that the report Command for 1 February 1998 to 3 1 January 1999 was received and placed in Petitioner record on 5 August 1999; that the FY 00 selection board convened on 24 May 1999 and adjourned 4 June 1999; and that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00666-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD:hd Docket No: 00666-01 15 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: LCDR Sq iiaiiiiiinibee ssc, US REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Feb 16 10_49_51 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant he would have been assigned had he been promoted in due course. His current date of rank, 24 November 1999, is the date given to him as though he was selected by the FY-99 Active-Duty Lieutenant Line...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07431-00
In addition, the Board considered the Navy Personnel Command the memorandum for the record dated 5 March 2001, and the NPC opinion dated 6 March 2001 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the PERS-85 advisory opinion dated 6 March 2001 in finding that your date of rank should not be adjusted because you would not have rated an adjustment when you came on active duty, had you requested one. r October 1996 of rank adjustment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08398-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Our records indicate that the member’s BCNR directed corrections were completed prior to the FY-98 board. A review of the member’s master officer file and the record of proceedings for the FY-98 Active Duty Lieutenant Commander Chaplain Corps Promotion Selection Board, convened on 5 May...