Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01398-01
Original file (01398-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                2 NAVY ANNEX

                         WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100




                         LCC:ddj
                         Docket No: 1398-01
                         22 May 2001




           This is in reference to your application for correction of your
           naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
           United States Code, section 1552.

           A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
           Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
           application on 22 May 2001. Your allegations of error and
           injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
           regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
           Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
           your application, together with all material submitted in
           support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
           regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
           advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER 85/342
           of 25 April 2001, a copy of which is attached.

           After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
           record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
           insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
           error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
           concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
           Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
           votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
           request.

           It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
           that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
           the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
           material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
           the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
           a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
           Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
           naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
           existence of probable material error or injustice.

                                                   Sincerely,



                                                                    W. DEAN
                                                                    PFEIFFER



              Executive Director

           Enclosure



                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                           NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
                            5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

             MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000


                                                        1430
                                                         Ser 85/342 25 Apr
01



     MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
                         RECORDS (BCNR)

     Via:   Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)

     Subj:  COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF


     Ref:   (a) BUPERSINST 1430.16D

     End:   (1) BCNR file #01398—01

     1.     Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a),
     enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

     2. Petty Officer  was selected for advancement to DC2 with an
     effective da e of 16 November 1995. He was released from active duty
     on 3 August 1995, prior to his advancement date. His DD-214 is
     correct. No relief is recommended regarding his petition.




                                by airection

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01153-01

    Original file (01153-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03719-01

    Original file (03719-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. A requirement for advancement under the Accelerated As of when she was issued an advancement certificate, 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02186-01

    Original file (02186-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 85/461 of 12 June 2001, a copy of opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02021-01

    Original file (02021-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00071-01

    Original file (00071-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08388-00

    Original file (08388-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and session, considered your application on 2 1 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04747-01

    Original file (04747-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01893-01

    Original file (01893-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02107-01

    Original file (02107-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 7 July 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer was denied the opportunity to compete 3 for advancement in examination cycle 168, September 2000.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04327-01

    Original file (04327-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Office relief is recommended in this case.