Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01396-00
Original file (01396-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 203704100

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 1396-00
27 June2000

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 June 2000.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 SER  
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice

N130D/OU0329  of 14 June 2000, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration  
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
the advisory opinion. Accordingly,  your application has been denied.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in

of,the entire record, the Board found that the

  The names and votes of

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

;

Enclosure

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

t-

DEPARTMENT OF THE
OFFICE  OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION
N

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-200

  NAV Y

S

0

IN REPLY REFER TO
5420
Ser 
14 June 2000

N130D/ 

OuO329

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (Pers-OOZCB)

Ref:

(a) DODINST 1304.22

Encl:

(1) BCNR File  

#01396-00  with microfiche service record

The following 

p.rovides comment and recommendation on former

1.
Petty Officer
that the 24-month extension of enlistment signed to guarantee
entry into the Advance Electronics Field (AEF) and early
advancement to pay grade E-4 be removed from her record on the
grounds the extension became superfluous when she later
reenlisted.

Petty Officer

petition.

requests

2.

N130 recommends deny MS.

request.

Petty Officer

initial enlistment into the Navy was
ay she signed an agreement and

3.
on 1 June 1987.
statement of understanding that by electing training in the
Advance Electronics Field  
accelerated advancement to pay grade E-4 she was obligating
service for four years plus twenty four months (a six year
obligation).
execution (signing of the agreement
it could not be canceled.
was 31 May 1993.

Further, the 24-month extension became binding upon
- 1 June 1987) and thereafter

(AEF)/Technical  Field (ATF) program and

Her end of obligated service (EAOS)

re-enlisted for six

On 30 May 1991, Petty Officer

4.
$14,007.60.
years with a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) of  
Petty
This bonus was for four of her six-year re-enlistment.
Officer Francis received the bonus in a standard payment scheme
of half 
on the re-enlistment date with five equal amount annual
Her SRB was not for the full six-year
installments thereafter.
re-enlistment term because of the 24-months remaining to her
initial enlistment.
contractual service agreement'
from using the period of any existing contractual service

That 24-months is classified as 'existing

and reference (a) prevents members

Subj:

COMMENT  AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER ET3

.USN,

agreement for SRB comput
about) 29 May 1997. MS.
this information.

Her new EAOS was then (on or
petition correctly confirms

m

Because SRB

On 18 October 1996,

Petty Officer-was separated fro

5.
the Navy based on weight control failure; member failed to meet
the Navy's established weight (body fat) standards.
is paid to members for being available and working in a critical
military skill, members who do not complete the term of service
return the unearned
for which a bonus is paid are required to
When Petty Officer
portion of the bonus.
the Navy she was a little over seven months short of completing
d
her obligated term of service.
1,218 days of the expected 1,440 days service, and for which the
$11,848.10  and owes
bonus of 
-$2,159.51,  minus an adjustment for final pay earned at
separation plus any charges for interest, penalty and
administrative fees based on the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and
the Deficit Reduction Acts of 1984.

$14,007.60 was paid.

Petty Officer-arne

She earned  

separated from

Based on my review,

6.
Accounting Service, Denver Center,

the letter by Defense Finance and

of 6 October 1999 to MS.

Based on my reading of the
ects correct.
incorrectly assumed her SRB was based on a

six-year term of service rather than the correct four years.
Incorrectly assuming six-years
approximate seven months remaining to EAOS, one could estimate
the debt to about $700.

and then subtracting the

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

7.
herewith as enclosure (1).

Head, Enlisted Bonus

Programs Policy Section



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08723-00

    Original file (08723-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    20350-2000 Y S N IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 22 Jun 01 01ul112 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #08723-00 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and.recommendation Petty 1. requests favorable action that will allow payment of an EB in the amount of $4,000. enters the DEP determines the amount of EB a member is eligible According to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07322-98

    Original file (07322-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:mh Docket No: 7322-98 25 May 1999 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. equests repayment of tive Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) recouped...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05290-02

    Original file (05290-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. comment and recommendation on former requests the recoupment petition. case was ed portion of N130 recommends denial is not entitled to keep the SRB is a retention incentive paid to enlisted members serving 2 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00593-01

    Original file (00593-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N of which is attached. N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) . In his Id requests favorable action as disenrolled from he Electronics EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the Members who fail to complete basic including failure to graduate from and who do not continue in the skill for which The Navy offers an 4. discretion of recruiters and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03955-01

    Original file (03955-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. D.C. 20350.2000 Y S N IN REPLY REFER 542 0 N130Dl/ 6 Aug 01 TO OlU1198 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03955-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. does not have an EB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04844-01

    Original file (04844-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. 01~1355 2DIDl MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #04844-01 with microfiche service record 1. 01 albeit he does not have requests favorable action Petty Officer -claims / Electronics \\ EB is not an entitlement, but a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08500-01

    Original file (08500-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Enlistment Bonus (EB). Fireman, and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04530-00

    Original file (04530-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (AECF/AEF) On 26 January 2000 Seamen In his petition, Seamen - Carlson requests payment of EB Program and He shipped to active EB is paid upon successful completion EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 4. discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. member has started training in the skill for which they are to receive an EB, and receive an EB. EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06895-02

    Original file (06895-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO591 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN w Encl: (1) BCNR case file #06895-02 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07068-01

    Original file (07068-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N130Dl/ 7 May 2002 02UO198 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07068-01 with microfiche service record 1. entered the Delayed Entry Program , volunteered for the Advanced Command (RTC) on 22 September 2000. requests favorable action that'would allow payment of an Petty Officer EB College Kicker in addition to the EB that is...