Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01464-01
Original file (01464-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

BJG
Docket No: 1464-01
8 August 2001

Dear

;‘.

This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the
record be corrected to show that you were advanced to ETR2, pay grade E-5.

application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
United States Code, section 1552. You requested that your

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 August 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated
30 May 2001, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the’advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
n,ew
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of 
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

NAVY 

PERSONNEL COMMAN
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

Y

D

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)

Subj: C

F

Ref:

Encl:

(a) BUPERSINST 

1430.16D

(1) BCNR file  

#01464-01

Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a),

1.
enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

2.
Fe
which was after his release from active

as selected for advancement from the cycle 69,
am.
His advancement date was 16 October 1975,

duty date of

By direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03719-01

    Original file (03719-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. A requirement for advancement under the Accelerated As of when she was issued an advancement certificate, 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04747-01

    Original file (04747-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01398-01

    Original file (01398-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04327-01

    Original file (04327-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Office relief is recommended in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03064-01

    Original file (03064-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the by the Board consisted of your proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04838-01

    Original file (04838-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 85 of 8 August 2001, a copy of which is,attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03362-01

    Original file (03362-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 16 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02263-01

    Original file (02263-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend the petitioner's advancement to Petty recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05153-01

    Original file (05153-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested, in effect, that the date of rank and effective date of your promotion to lieutenant be adjusted from 1 October, 2001 to 28 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01153-01

    Original file (01153-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...