NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07643-00
JLP: ddj Docket No: 7643-00 8 June 2001 DEPI\RTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOFI CORRECTION OF 2 NAVY ANNEX NAL AL RECORD S W/,SHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus (EB) entitlement. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07644-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC dated 15 December 2000, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting removal of the remaining contested document, the Drug Disposition Recommendation dated 31 January 1981 (document 9-9). Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07650-00
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTEIRS UNITED STATES :3280 RUSSELL ROA QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 MA!PlNE CORP S D 134-!i 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB 6 IIOV ?flflo MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07657-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Subsequently, on 17 June 1982 you were separated with an honorable discharge by reason of "homosexuality or she was a homosexual or bisexual". Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07658-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 31 May 1996 the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with a general discharge by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07662-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. for a member who executes a no-cost move from a duty station with a higher BAH rate to a duty station with a lower BAH rate, when the member did not move dependents.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07666-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2001. unauthorized absence of about seven days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07671-01
The Performance Evaluation Review uested an advisory opinion in the case of Capta Captain requesting a date of rank adjustment to 990101 and a special selection board. The following facts are germane to the case: a. Captain as selected for Captain by the FY99 USMC Captain Promotion Selection Board. )c+~ & d. Reference (a) states the SECNAV is authorized to convene a special selection board to consider cases of "officers who were in or above the promotion zone before a promotion selection...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07675-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that his name was not removed from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and that he was not discharged from the Navy. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Shy and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 27 September 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07678-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07685-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Several other conditions and ratings were added over the next eight your current VA rating is 1998. the VA awards disability ratings without regard to the issue of fitness for military duty, whereas the military departments may assign ratings only in those cases where the service member In...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07690-01
You requested that your lieutenant date of rank and effective date be changed from 1 October 2001 to 1 April 2001 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07691-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that if he were to be on active duty during a time of emotional strain, he may react in a similar way. has probably grown substantially since ility to reflect in a mature way on his Unfortunately, it is well known...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07693-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After your first NJP, you were formally counseled regarding your misconduct and warned that failure to take corrective action could result in administrative separation under other than honorable conditions. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07694-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 200 1. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07695-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board found the evidence and materials submitted were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the serious nature of your frequent and lengthy periods of UA, and your request for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07697-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, it noted that in view of the In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge for the good of the service was erroneous or unjust, and which establishes that you were unfit for duty at the time of your discharge, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07701-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that when placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), his disability was classified as combat related. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Carlsen, Pfeiffer and Tew, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07702-00
On 23 October 1990, a Navy psychologist determined that Petitioner suffered from a severe, longstanding personality disorder, not otherwise specified, and recommended that he be considered for On 2 November 1990, Petitioner was administrative separation because of that disorder. CONCLUSION: In this regard, it notes that diagnoses of major depression and personality Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the available evidence insufficient to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07702-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, and your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07707-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07708-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his leave ballance as of 1 Ocotber 2000 be corrected to reflect an additional 8 days of accrued leave to compensate member for leave erroneously lost when he transferred from the Air Force in 1999. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Neuschafer, Frankfurt, and Ms. Davis,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07708-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded your discharge, narrative reason for separation, and reenlistment code were proper and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07709-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07711-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. They had no grounds to remove your failure by the FY 2002 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, since they found insufficient basis to remove your failure by the FY 2001 selection board, and the fitness report in question was in your record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07711-99
The hearing panel found him unfit for continued naval service, and recommended that he be separated with a 10% rating under VA code 5295. It concludes that the PEB hearing panel gave too much weight to the statement of Dr. , which reflects substantially different In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting corrective action; however, as Petitioner ’s condition was subject to improvement at the time of his separation from the Navy, permanent retirement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07712-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 September 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07713-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his state of legal residence was Pennsylvania until he transferred to the Fleet Reserve. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07713-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07717-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the characterization of his separation from under honorable conditions to fully honorable. The minimum i. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to an individual who completes his enlistment but is not recommended for reenlistment due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07719-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 7719-00 27 February 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: Encl: FORMER REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he was retired by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07726-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 15 November 1998. aware that HQMC has routinely recommended corrective action in similar cases when an individual is qualified for reserve retirement and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07730-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was assigned a reenlistment code more favorable than the code of RE-4 she was assigned on 30 July 1998. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hogue, Kastner and allegations of error and injustice on 1 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07731-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TJR Docket No: 7731-01 8 November 2001 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF' ,l. Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pfeiffer reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07732-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. However, the Board found the evidence and materials submitted were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the lengthy periods of UA and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07739-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code since you were given the most favorable code The Board noted your contention that authorized by regulation. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07741-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 7741-00 24 July 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone Military...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07745-99
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF I RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in the reason for his discharge to show that his illness was service connected and/or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07746-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval corrected to show entitlement to Continuous Submarine Pay to 15 May 2000. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, .~ allegations of error and injustice on 27 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07751-01
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments Series of Documents Subject’s naval record 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show that she elected to participate Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 October 2001 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07756-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 7756-01 23 October 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07764-01
The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Goldsmith, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on IO October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board concluded CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an following corrective action. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07768-00
ability to serve was impaired by personal, financial and family problems; You have submitted evidence showing that you were diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia in December 1978. factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated and lengthy Concerning the mental illness, periods of unauthorized absence. the advisory opinion concluded that there is no evidence that you were suffering from paranoid schizophrenia during the period...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07770-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2002. Docu~iientary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all niaterial subniitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted early on 29 September 2001 for four years at the request of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07771-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was reduced in grade from LCPL (E-3) to PFC (E-2), vice to W T (E-1) . Since Petitioner has been treated no differently than others discharged by reason of drug abuse, the Board concludes that there was no error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4B reenlistment code. The Board further...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07782-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 8 May 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. You then served in a satisfactory manner until your The record shows that you satisfactorily Subsequently, you were issued an Regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07785-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs Dunn, Neuschafer, and M S Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07791-00
He obtained the fitness report on 5 November 2000. states he was honorably discharged at the expiration of enlistment, as extended, on 6 November 2000. If The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the circumstances which led to his further service and crediting of drills. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that a. he was not discharged became...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07792-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07800-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your application on 14 June 2001. As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty because of diabetes mellitus on 21 September 1991, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.